Users Online Now:
2,125
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,891,682
Pageviews Today:
2,620,760
Threads Today:
640
Posts Today:
12,206
08:07 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
NYT : Obama trying to make sure South Korea doesn't retaliate in kind against NKorea if there's a provocation
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Citizenperth:MV8yMTk1MTM2XzM3MTUwMDc1XzRGOUNEMzlE] [quote:calx:MV8yMTk1MTM2XzM3MTUwMDU2X0U0QTNFMEE1] If South Korea strikes first doesn't that give China the green light to kick arse and defend NK? [/quote] we just signed up to the chinese dollar.... http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2195139/pg1 :hiding::hiding::hiding::hiding::hiding::hiding: [/quote]
Original Message
[
link to twitter.com
]
NYT: Some of the public language from #ROK gov't suggests Seoul & Washington may not agree on how far any retaliation should go.
NYT quotes unnamed senior U.S. official: "Overreaction by South Korea is a real risk — and we’re working on that problem.”
Overreaction = striking back.
I'm sure Obama only want new BS sanctions on North Korea or some other meaningless shit.
SHUT THE FUCK UP OBAMA. South Korea is gonna retaliate the way the fuck they want.
America fucking invaded 2 countries over 3000 dead... so shut the fuck up about ``overreacting``...
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>