Users Online Now:
2,072
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
810,738
Pageviews Today:
1,063,674
Threads Today:
266
Posts Today:
3,862
09:01 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
GLP Contest! With all that is going on this week, find what important thing that is happening that is not covered by msm!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Foolfooter:MV8yMjA3NzQ0XzM3NDYyNDQxX0M0MzU4RjVG] [quote:Waterbug:MV8yMjA3NzQ0XzM3Mzk4MzY4XzdBNzgwNEYx] I'm surprised, but not really.. that more people aren't commenting.. http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2206967/pg1 [quote:Waterbug:MV8yMjA2OTY3XzM3MzYzNDAxXzgyMUMxNURG] http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-approves-raising-permissible-levels-of-nuclear-radiation-in-drinking-water-civilian-cancer-deaths-expected-to-skyrocket/5331224 [snip] [b]The White House has given final approval[/b] for dramatically raising permissible radioactive levels in drinking water and soil following “radiological incidents,” such as nuclear power-plant accidents and dirty bombs. The final version, slated for Federal Register publication as soon as today, is [b]a win for the nuclear industry which seeks what its proponents call a “new normal” for radiation exposure[/b] among the U.S population, according Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). In soil, the PAGs allow long-term public exposure to radiation in amounts as high as 2,000 millirems. This would, in effect, increase a longstanding 1 in 10,000 person cancer rate to a rate of 1 in 23 persons exposed over a 30-year period. [/quote] [/quote] Indeed wierd that not more GLP-ers take on the challenge of finding what we are missing. [/quote]
Original Message
Okay, so this week a lot is going on. Bomb threat here and there, gun legislation debate here and there. N Korea playing with nukes and such.
NOW, what is the really important thing we are being distracted from?
Your opinions here please.
I opt for a huge financial crisis that will invoke martial law before it really happen with the terror threat as excuse.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>