Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,900 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 531,560
Pageviews Today: 871,603	Threads Today: 253	Posts Today: 4,769
09:07 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject Prince Charles can NEVER be king while married to Camilla - it is against the monarchy constitution.

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 32281494:MV8yMzAxNTU0XzM5MjAwNjk3X0NGODYwNDg=]
[quote:Flight 815:MV8yMzAxNTU0X0E2QzRENjE3]
For those of you who don't know this - Prince Charles can never inherit the throne while he is married to Camilla because Camilla is a divorcee. This is considered adultery by monarch rules.

A monarchy constitutional crisis occurred in 1936 concerning King Edward VIII and Mrs. Simpson. Edward had to decide between the throne or divorcee Mrs. Simpson. This was big news at the time and is now part of history - in fact TV series have been made around it. He ended up forsaking the monarchy to marry her.

After the Queen dies, the proverbial will hit the fan, many will be shocked to find this out as he is pulled up on this "technicality". I believe there may have been a conspiracy to lull Charles into a false sense of security on the matter though perhaps he is still aware of it, but the public at large don't know - yet. But they will.

The only way Charles can take the throne upon the death of his mother, is either to dump Camilla (which he won't) or that Camilla's first husband dies.

I believe instead that Princess Anne will ascend the throne. She is nice but naive, unprepared for the job and will be out of her depth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_VIII
[/quote]

I wondered about this.  I doesn't seem right that Edward abdicated because he married a divorced woman and Charles would be allowed to be King.  I didn't even think that the crown should pass to his sibling instead of his offspring!
Since the offspring was "legitimate" from his first marriage, and was the 2nd in line at his birth, does that make a difference?
[/quote]

Original Message For those of you who don't know this - Prince Charles can never inherit the throne while he is married to Camilla because Camilla is a divorcee. This is considered adultery by monarch rules.

A monarchy constitutional crisis occurred in 1936 concerning King Edward VIII and Mrs. Simpson. Edward had to decide between the throne or divorcee Mrs. Simpson. This was big news at the time and is now part of history - in fact TV series have been made around it. He ended up forsaking the monarchy to marry her.

After the Queen dies, the proverbial will hit the fan, many will be shocked to find this out as he is pulled up on this "technicality". I believe there may have been a conspiracy to lull Charles into a false sense of security on the matter though perhaps he is still aware of it, but the public at large don't know - yet. But they will.

The only way Charles can take the throne upon the death of his mother, is either to dump Camilla (which he won't) or that Camilla's first husband dies.

I believe instead that Princess Anne will ascend the throne. She is nice but naive, unprepared for the job and will be out of her depth.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>