Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
USAF and Obama shutting down Space Fence Oct 1
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:war eagle 41997809:MV8yMzIwMDczXzM5NTY5MDgyXzkwQTI5QjI2] http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2320073/pg1 Already posted. great find for me. All the surveillance systems rely on the fence. there are only so many ways to track objects in space, a fence is the best way unless there an array of lunar satellites. When I was in the military i was posted at a site that tracked objects, not like you would think. The fence was the source for everything. 14 million, they spent more on body bags and ammunition in one month. Pulling the plug on 33 means something as a symbol to someone. Incoming. The ISS must, must, have the fence to detect objects and divert. They must abandon the ISS. [/quote]
This is mind boggling stupid, to save 14 million they are shutting down the space surveillance system that tracks objects in space.
"The U.S. Air Force will shut down its space surveillance system that tracks satellites and other orbiting objects by October 1 due to budget constraints"
Obviously they don't feel the need to track objects past October 1st.
I'd say something is up, they getting ready to bug out, and they don't want anyone to know about the incomings.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)