Users Online Now:
2,256
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,495,949
Pageviews Today:
2,488,235
Threads Today:
997
Posts Today:
17,756
11:14 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
ISON COVER UP/May not be a Comet
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMzI1MjM3XzM5NzA0NzM3XzdFQjdEMkU1] [quote:Anonymous Coward 44535027:MV8yMzI1MjM3XzM5NzA0MTQ1X0RCNzU1OUJD] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMzI1MjM3XzM5Njk5NTQ0XzlGNURBOEZG] [quote:Ford Prefect:MV8yMzI1MjM3XzM5Njk4NTcwX0JBMTU4NDA=] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yMzI1MjM3XzM5Njk4NDU1XzQ4M0ZBNDdB] [quote:Ford Prefect:MV8yMzI1MjM3XzM5Njk4NDM3X0YwNkI2MkQw] Does anyone know what to make of it?? http://f55i.img-up.net/ISON_prota26b4.jpg For what's worth I measured the angles of the two glowing lines of the "wing" formation with a protractor, and they make an arch of 121.5 degrees. I'm just assuming that it makes harder to be random "streaks of light". [/quote] [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MuA_bgWzpVY[/youtube] [/quote] Parallax or not parallax, still doesn't explain why NASA airbrushed the coma to hide that V shape structure, if it's nothing but an optical effect. I'm assuming you won't make their same mistake and take us for granted, because the Hubble image viewer works with multiple-layer images of the same quadrant, what explains why the winged formation only appears after the image is darkened. How come the coma totally fades away and all the noise and stars in the background dim, but your "parallax" doesn't fade and still glowing???? [/quote] Learn what dynamic range is and the difference between a 32 bit image and an 8 bit display monitor. The web tool there is automatically guessing where to put the histogram levels and given that most targets are dim, it errs on the side of making things too bright. Get a real fits editor like pixinsight and download the raw data for yourself. The comet's nucleus was naturally one of the brightest parts of the image. It's not a conspiracy. They didn't actually over expose the individual shots, it's all there, but YouTube tards like the one in the op's video are not amateur astronomers equipped with proper software to handle high bit depth Hubble images, so they draw erroneous conclusions from web viewers. [/quote] Do you seriously believe that your junk is convincing lol [/quote] It's the truth, not junk, I really don't care if you personally find it "convincing" or not. How many years have you been doing astrophotography involving high bit depth imaging (anything >8 bit)? [/quote]
Original Message
We are not being shown the correct images. Until Now. [
link to hla.stsci.edu
]
Comet with Planets, Hercolobus [
link to www.youtube.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>