|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
Gun Ownership Drops, Threat of Racial Conflict Rises: The Government's Us vs Them
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
While the commonly held belief is that the government's advocacy of anti-arms laws has inspired a dramatic increase in firearm purchases, statists show that gun ownership is actually falling in America. Gallup shows that at the height of the anti-arms advocacy fears, gun ownership fell three percent between the years 2010 and 2011 alone. The average gun owner now owns more firearms than previously, but there are fewer gun owners themselves. As the American people quietly disarm, the threat of internal conflict can however be seen to increase. In the news for the past several months has been story after story of hate crimes being perpetrated against whites by members of the black community. The racial devide appears to be widening, as is animosity.
In the past, it was rare that I would see or hear comments by black individuals declaring their hatred for whites, but such has now become relatively frequent, even on this very website. Among these increasingly more common slurs and cries of injustice, are often calls for violence and declarations of a coming "race war." Even government officials are now doing it, as can be seen by today's thread referencing a DHS employee. While the situation hardly appears dire at this very moment, I can't help but to wonder if the circumstances may be intentionally contrived by an entity which stands to benefit from what may be to come.
It's long been commonly accepted, particularly in communities such as this one, that the government permits and in fact orchestrates lethally disasterous situations for the purpose of achieving its goals through the problem-reaction-solution method. Just a few years ago we saw increased killings within Mexico and in the southern states of America, which the government related to soft gun laws allowing the Mexican cartells to easily acquire arms to use for their crimes. This culminated when an Arizona congresswoman was shot, however it wasn't long later that the ATF's Fast and Furious operation became exposed, and we learned that the government had been the ones supplying the cartels with arms, primarily in the AK varient.
Despite fears that firearms reform would lead to limiting access to weapons, and despite the Fast and Furious scandle being exposed, the number of citizens owning weapons began to drop. Next came the gunman at the Aurora movie theater, and soon after, the most lethal school shooting since Virginia Tech took place at Sandy Hook and gained widespread publicity. Again calls for disarmament could be heard from government officials and now grieving parents alike, and again gun ownership dropped. Not long after that, the American people became inundated with news reports about the Zimmerman case. It was the topic of discussion at every watercooler across America. With the help of its widespread publicity it became a landmark case inciting interest, anger, and further division along the lines or race. Once the verdict was handed down, even government officials began stepping forward to further inflame the situation, suggesting an injustice has occured, and calling for and working toward a retrial, in an official capacity.
As the black community continues to simmer, the government's back to stockpiling AK weaponry and munitions as it must have done prior to the Fast and Furious operation. Kalashnikov (AK) weaponry isn't in use by the US government, US military, nor our NATO allies. It's of Russian design, and America wouldn't be stockpiling it for it's own usage. Meanwhile, other supplies are also suddenly being stockpiled in large quantity by the government. Conclusion of the stockpiling is slated for October 1st. As these supplies are being gathered, the United States is to be conducting myriad drills with it's military and law enforcement organizations, as well as with the soldiers of other nations, including the UN. These drills demonstrate themselves to be simulating the execution of combat operations and martial law within America.
As racial division continues to widen, and gun ownership continues to decline, an effort toward disarmament of the American public and a strategy of "divide and conquer" falls into view. If disarmament of the American people is a priority as it indeed appears to be, might a limited violent conflict among America's streets as a result of aggravated racial tension be exactly what our political leaders want? During Katrina, the US military swept in and successfully confiscated the firearms of New Orleans residents without challenge, and yet there wasn't even any violence to justify such action. Should another incident occur in the near future, being race related and involving firearms, isn't it possible that we could see sufficient animosity to inspire sufficient violence as to create a state of emergency severe enough for our communities to be "locked down" by authorities, as we're beginning to see happen across the country, leading to an intensification of our totalitarian state and simultaneous confiscation of arms? And if so, what's the big picture - where are we going from there?
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
