Users Online Now:
1,670
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
769,504
Pageviews Today:
1,314,591
Threads Today:
503
Posts Today:
9,318
02:43 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
What If The Point Of Getting U.S. To Attack Syria Is To Start WWIII---And Take The U.S. Down?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 46302849:MV8yMzQ0NjI4XzQwMDM2MjAyXzVBMUQ1NDZB] you do not get 250 million armed civilians down. [/quote]
Original Message
Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad.
Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter.
Just a speculation....what do you think?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>