Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,320 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 462,493
Pageviews Today: 595,319	Threads Today: 180	Posts Today: 2,092
05:14 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject The Walking Dead should not of killed off Scott Wilson character Hershel

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

Original Message The writers of the Walking Dead, made a huge mistake killing off Hershel's character. Trust me I felt a deep bad feeling, when they slaughtered him like cattle. The writers wanted Hershel's {a major character} death to be the most cruel and viciously violent of them all, by the hands of living person {not the undead}. They killed a senior citizen and young child all in the same episode. Focusing on killing the young and old. I got a very bad feeling about the possible hidden truth behind it all. Why was it so important to kill off Hershel's character the way of decapitation? Scott Wilson brought reason, compassion, and care playing the major role of Hershel. The Walking Dead needs new writers. Also they have a supernatural event occurring, the dead rising and they are staying away from explaing or understanding the reasons why. No talk about revelations end of times, no talk about possible Alien presence on earth. The Walking Dead writers have not gone there yet, in visually showing the tv viewers where the virus originated. Why after 4 seasons they have not shown the origin of the outbreak of the virus plague?. Why do they continue to have the show's characters based in Atlanta?

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>