Users Online Now:
1,210
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
235,615
Pageviews Today:
301,517
Threads Today:
61
Posts Today:
980
02:33 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
NASA Admits Original Moon Landing Tapes Got Erased
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQzMzQ4XzdDNjQ0QTAz] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQzMTcyX0I0MTgyNEIw] [quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQyOTQ0X0MwRjlFNDlC] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQyODQwX0M2NTY0QUI1] [quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQyNTM3XzFGQUJEQTgy] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQyMTE3XzJBOTQxMERD] [quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQxNzYxXzlBOEVGMDcy] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQxMzU5X0I4NzE4MzVG] [quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQwOTM3X0JDQjhFQjZE] [quote:Anonymous Coward 65695781:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQwODA5XzcxRUZGRjlF] [quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQwNjQ5XzFGMUQxNzkw] [quote:Dr. Astro:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDQwMjQ3X0ZGQUM5MjRC] [quote:Anonymous Coward 68636372:MV8yOTE2Mzk5XzUxNDM5OTQ2XzRCRDZERUE2] It's readily admitted that all those stage show props only had the computing power of a pocket calculator. Just enough to make lights blink and screens turn to give the appearance of doing something. [/quote] So the shuttle is fake too? Interesting. Also interesting, you can build a copy of the original Apollo guidance computer for yourself... http://klabs.org/history/build_agc/ You can also run the original Apollo guidance computer software in an emulator of the original hardware and even put it into a physically accurate flight simulator and make it think it's flying to the moon all over again. http://nassp.sourceforge.net/wiki/Main_Page It works. Sure, the computer's not particularly fast, and there's no graphical interface at all, it's all just numbers, but the instructions are publicly available and it really does work for getting you to the moon. It didn't need all the bells and whistles of modern computers. All the heavy number crunching was done on the ground to determine the trajectory needed to get to the moon, all the on board computer had to do was follow the flight plan. Its main job was to determine where it was in space using the star and horizon sightings fed to it by the astronauts (no, the command module was not capable of navigating itself to the moon and back accurately; it needed human visual input) and determine the orientation of the spacecraft based on those sightings so that it could hold itself in specified attitudes and perform burns to reach velocities (measured by accelerometers) specified by the astronauts who were following the flight plan. [/quote] The Rockets were just like missiles. They launched and either blew up somewhere over the ocean or landed in the sea. Nobody was actually inside them. Later the apollo Command Modules were dumped into the ocean by plane to simulate the astronauts return. The later developed "space shuttles " are just glorified glider plans used in a similar manner. Speaking of simulations, the guidance computer software is just that, a simulation. A cheap video game that runs algorithms and crunches numbers but has no bearing on reality. [/quote] Except they were observed in orbit and observed leaving orbit and tracked on the way to and from the Moon. [/quote] Observed by who? NASA, or observatories that require the existence of the space hoax to justify funding. [/quote] Yes, that's it, thousands of astronomers all over the world knew it wasn't really there but lied to say it was in order to "justify funding" and not a single one of them leaked a word about their lies before they died. Oh, and amateurs too. Sky & Telescope, February 1970, pg 127-130. Look it up. [/quote] Yeah if over 100,000 can keep shut on the Manhattan project, [/quote] Except that they didn't. The Soviets knew about it before we even detonated the first bomb. http://io9.com/secrets-of-the-manhattan-project-were-leaked-a-staggeri-1626524763 1500 leaks, no biggie. And that's with a more or less sequestered work force. Now try doing that in 29 countries with astronomers all over the world who saw Apollo. Including amateurs. Yeah, good luck. [quote:AC] So they see a blurb in the sky. It could have been space junk or some other celestial phenomena, but they are told by the propagandists at NASA and the U.S. government that this blurb is the "Apollo 11 rocket" . Then they parrot what they are told non-the-wiser. [/quote] How much experience do you have with satellite tracking? I'm guessing none. No, that's not how it works. [/quote] The Russians may have known about it...because they planted spys. But even with an alleged 1,500 leaks it still somehow NEVER REACHED PUBLIC CONSCIOUSNESS! [/quote] 1500 leaks. 1500 leaks. 1500 leaks. 1500 leaks. 1500 leaks.1500 leaks. 1500 leaks.1500 leaks.1500 leaks.1500 leaks. And yes, it reached public consciousness, that's why you know about it today. Get it yet? If you were trying to find out about it back then it would not have been hard to find leaked info. Fortunately for them the internet didn't exist yet. 1500 leaks. Apollo? None. Because it wasn't a conspiracy. [/quote] We know about it today because the U.S. dropped a bomb Hiroshima causing an atomic explosion. That's when it became public knowledge that government had engaged in a massive conspiracy to create the weapon. It was not public knowledge before that. [/quote] Why do you know about the project to develop said bomb? I thought the government could pull off a perfect massive leakless conspiracy according to you? How is it that we know about the project to develop it? Why weren't they able to keep the methods used to develop said bomb a perfect secret, why weren't they able to keep the very nature of the weapon used a complete and total secret? Sure, we'd know something had blown up an entire city, but why do we even know about the basics of what it was if such a conspiracy were possible? Why do our enemies know? Because they can't keep a conspiracy that large a secret indefinitely or even for very long! [/quote] No kidding. The conspiracy ended when they dropped the bomb and they made not attempt continue the conspiracy because the fruits of the conspiracy were so obviously out in the open. [/quote]
Original Message
NASA admitted in 2006 that they could not locate the authentic video copy of the July 20, 1969, Moon landing.
Since then, Richard Nafzger, an engineer at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center has figured out what happened to the original recordings of the moon landing...
[
link to therundownlive.com
]
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>