Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,956 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 998,473
Pageviews Today: 1,786,060Threads Today: 771Posts Today: 13,634
08:15 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject Analysis of black box data of Flight 77 proves it could not have knocked down five light poles at the Pentagon
User Name
 
 
Font color:  Font:








In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
Original Message Monday, March 26th, 2007

Calum Douglas is an engineering student at Oxford Brookes University. An active 911 Truth researcher and lecturer, he is working with pilotsfor911truth.org. In a recent breakthrough using the ‘Freedom of Information’ act he has gained access to raw Black Box data from the flight recorder of Flight 77, that allegedly struck the Pentagon. It has subsequently been decoded and analysed. Here Calum presents his findings.
[link to rinf.com]
(1 hr 28 min video)

Calum Douglas has proved:
1. If the Pentagon gas station video footage is genuine, the plane that crashed into the Pentagon is about 40 feet shorter than a Boeing 757 - more like a 737.
2. Either the two Pentagon officers who claimed to see a large plane fly past them to the north of the Citgo gas station are wrong or the black box data officially claimed to be that of Flight 77 has been changed before its release. This is because, although the flight data indicate the flight path was to the south of the gas station, it was 273 feet above ground at the the point the data ends, making it impossible to knock down the light poles. In other words, either the poles were planted or else the data has been changed to create a too high an altitude. Why would this be done when it would be immediately exposed whenever the data was released to the public? Why would the conspirators want to incriminate themselves by releasing data that contradicts the official story? This is not pointless fabrication but proof that the light poles were not knocked down by Flight 77 - therefore smoking gun evidence of conspiracy. Someone forgot to check that the data was consistent with the official scenario before releasing it!

My view is that the data mysteriously finishes about one second before impact because it hides what actually happened. The black box data did NOT come from the plane the Pentagon officers saw, unless the data was altered to create the official flight path to the south of the Citgo gas station, with the error of omission being made that the altitude of the plane they saw was too high to knock down the light poles, whichever direction it had come. Either all the data was totally fabricated (proving conspiracy) or else it came from the ACTUAL plane (not Flight 77) that crashed into the Pentagon. This means that the plane the officers saw must have flown OVER the Pentagon, assuming they are not lying. The choice of which is the most likely possibility is yours.
Pictures (click to insert)
5ahidingiamwithranttomatowtf
bsflagIdol1hfbumpyodayeahsure
banana2burnitafros226rockonredface
pigchefabductwhateverpeacecool2tounge
 | Next Page >>





GLP