Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 2,820 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 1,183,746
Pageviews Today: 1,977,828	Threads Today: 811	Posts Today: 11,662
05:41 PM

Back to Thread

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject FEMA scientists study sulfur presence from steel of WTC

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Anonymous Coward 240823:MV8zODk5NThfQzZDRDgwOEM=]
Why has this not been a smoking gun issue?:

Official FEMA scientists Jonathan Barnett, Ronald R. Biederman, and R. D. Sisson, Jr. study sulfur found from the steel of wtc:

In Appendix C of FEMA's May 1, 2002 "investigative" report on why the towers collapsed, reference was made to a corrosive substance found on WTC steel: "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of samples 1 and 2 constitute an unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified."

Source: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

This called for further study, to determine what the source of this sulfur was, and what caused the steel to severely erode and corrode. But was this done? NIST, whose job it was to conduct such an investigation in order to silence skeptics, admits that it did no such thing:

"NIST did not test for the residue of...[explosive] compounds in the steel....NIST concluded that there were no explosives or controlled demolition involved in the collapses of the WTC towers."

Source: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

Well, there you have it! NIST assures us, with all its scientific credibility, that there was no sign of explosives being used to take the towers down. Yet they admit that they never tested for the presence of such explosives!!! Science indeed!
[/quote]

Original Message Why has this not been a smoking gun issue?:

Official FEMA scientists Jonathan Barnett, Ronald R. Biederman, and R. D. Sisson, Jr. study sulfur found from the steel of wtc:

In Appendix C of FEMA's May 1, 2002 "investigative" report on why the towers collapsed, reference was made to a corrosive substance found on WTC steel: "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of samples 1 and 2 constitute an unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified."

Source: [link to www.fema.gov]

This called for further study, to determine what the source of this sulfur was, and what caused the steel to severely erode and corrode. But was this done? NIST, whose job it was to conduct such an investigation in order to silence skeptics, admits that it did no such thing:

"NIST did not test for the residue of...[explosive] compounds in the steel....NIST concluded that there were no explosives or controlled demolition involved in the collapses of the WTC towers."

Source: [link to wtc.nist.gov]

Well, there you have it! NIST assures us, with all its scientific credibility, that there was no sign of explosives being used to take the towers down. Yet they admit that they never tested for the presence of such explosives!!! Science indeed!

Pictures (click to insert)

News