Users Online Now:
2,250
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
2,092,737
Pageviews Today:
2,907,533
Threads Today:
695
Posts Today:
13,781
10:00 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Shouldn't there already have been some serious geological events happening?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 110292:MV80NzY2MjdfNzMzOTA0MF9EMjEyOUY2] [quote:MJ 333056] You have shown yourself not worthy of response. I put your number in the advance search engine and all of your remarks suck. Your one of the GLP nasties and not worth my time or energy. [/quote] I use a rotating proxy - sound familiar [/quote]
Original Message
In astronomy terms 7 days to wait till the 23rd is like a 1000th of a millisecond. If the planet and galactic alignments are going to cause geological disturbances, shouldn't there already have been some serious geological events happening? why will these predicted/suspected events only happen at precise 12:00 22/12 or 12:00 23/12? Also doesn't 12/12/12 rather refer to day/month/year than TIME/month/year? i.e 12/12/2012 rather than 12:00 23 Dec 2007?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>