|
REPLY TO THREAD
|
|
Subject
|
VIDEO: Toben Extradition Trial
|
|
User Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Font color:
Font:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original Message
|
Dr. Fredrick Töben, an Australian citizen, seized while in transit on board at Heathrow, faces extradition to Germany under a European Arrest Warrant for an opinion crime.
Töben Extradition Trial
Lady Renouf
"we must stand firm !"
David Irving
" you cannnot be extradited for a political offence !"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ai9BYrbhJ9Q&eurl= [link to www.tellingfilms.co.uk]
Tags:
Jailing Opinions Fredrick Töben Michèle Lady Renouf David Irving European Arrest Warrant Revisionism Human Rights
...............................................
VIDEO: CENSORSHIP: A xxxxx Necessity
From: kps75
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt5PCXn2gqM&feature=related
VIDEO BY SCOTT ROBERTS
Comments by Video owner:
From: kps75
xxxs don't actually burn books. That's too 20th century. Now they order political deviants to to shut down their websites and put forth a concerted effort to censor ANYONE who dare speak the simple truth.
Censorship SCREAMS: "I can't convince you, I can't present any facts in opposition, or I am fearful of the truth being heard by the masses, so I'll silence you by force."
The greatest threat to our freedom to think, write, and speak freely is the Jewish power structure. Jewish censorship activities are necessitated by Jewish leaders' fear of exposure of their criminal and genocidal activities.
A government which censors the information available to its people, is a government which seeks to keep the people in a state of ignorance, and should not complain if the people have no loyalty to it.
In various countries across the globe, many Jewish supremacists have sought to impose their own special brand of censorship across the land. This is even true in America today, as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, an exclusively Jewish-organization, works to foist laws that suppress Free Speech if it is critical of them.
It is no exaggeration to suggest that many Jewish supremacists would like to see anyone who is critical of them in jail. Likewise, there are many Jews who would also like to see anyone who exposes the massive terror campaign going on in Palestine, committed by Jews for the most part, in jail.
This is probably the point where I'm expected to chime in
with the obligatory, "but not all Jews . . ." banter. However, I've grown so weary of Jewish excesses recently that I don't even feel that they deserve that; for, if there are some Jews who oppose this, they are so few in number as to hardly even be relevant to what is occurring on a worldwide scale. They certainly are doing nothing tangible to stop this censorship, caused mostly by Jews.
People Imprisoned around the Globe for Criticizing Jews Just ask Dr. Fredrick Toben of Australia. He questioned certain aspects of the Holocaust, suggesting that some of what Jews say are exaggerations. What Dr. Toben said was true, but Jews didn't like it. They didn't like it because it exposed them for the liars that they are. The Holocaust has always been useful for Jews as a money-making scheme, which it is, and as a device for inculcating a guilt-complex on unsuspecting Gentiles, making them more subservient to the Jews' needs through sympathy. As a result of Dr. Toben daring to question the Jewish-version of history, they worked to see him put in jail for a year. And they succeeded. Dr. Toben claims not to be anti-Semitic, and maybe he's telling the truth. But I certainly would be if I had to spend a year in jail for what he did. That appears to be the Jewish supremacist answer to all debates: If you can't beat them with facts and figures, put them in jail for daring to expose Jewish lies.
True or false, the holocaust story has had, and continues to have, big political ramifications. After the war, it was used to marshal popular support for establishing the state of Israel, and today the holocaust story continues to lend moral legitimacy to Israel.
Upon that legitimacy, hundreds of billions of US dollars have been transferred to Israel. The horror of the holocaust story has another important effect: It shields the political activity of Jews from public scrutiny. No need to belabor this point: one cannot critically comment upon the political activities of Jews or Israel as one might comment upon the activities of Catholics or the Vatican.
Those who are courageous enough to comment will certainly endure public branding: "Nazi!" "Jew-baiter!" "Anti semite!" But, perhaps most importantly, the holocaust story shows that the Jews are a special people, essentially different from the rest of humanity. Their suffering is unique in human history. No race, nowhere, at any time, as been subject to such persecution.
Theologically, one might say that the Jews have been sanctified by their suffering, as the Christian saints were sanctified by their suffering.
In the holocaust story, Hitler and the Jews are positioned as countervailing forces in a perfect polarity: At one pole, Hitler, the unique embodiment of Human Evil. At the other pole, those he tried to destroy, the Jews, the unique embodiment of Human Good.
But What If . . .
But what if the holocaust story is not true? Suppose the German National Socialists were not different in kind from others who have appeared in history throughout the millennia, and suppose that Hitler was not the Embodiment of Human Evil? What effect would that have on the polarity established by the holocaust story? Why, it might that mean the Jews are not the Embodiment of Human Good.
If the Holocaust story were shown to be hoax of the twentieth century, what of Israel, and what of the Manifest Destiny of the Jews?
Category: Nonprofits & Activism
Tags:
censorship jews israel jewish boss zionist zionism scottroberts
a comment under video:
In 1920-1921, the history of the concepts found in the Protocols was traced back to the works of Goedsche and Jacques Crétineau-Joly by Lucien Wolf (an English Jewish journalist), and published in London in August 1921. But a dramatic expose occurred in the series of articles in The Times by its Constantinople reporter, Philip Graves, who discovered the plagiarism from the work of Maurice Joly.
`
|
|
Pictures (click to insert)
|
 |  |  | |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | | Next Page >> |
|
