Users Online Now:
1,733
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,159,508
Pageviews Today:
2,032,616
Threads Today:
782
Posts Today:
15,514
09:56 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:KeepingItReal:MV84MTQ3MzlfMTQyMzE2ODVfQjgyRTZDQTU=] LOL. Nancy just posted this: [quote:Nancy (nli) 810978] Physics 101 Newtonian Mechanics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_mechanics In grade 10, when you are in a basic physics class you go through the demonstration that when you acceleration a block to rate a in metres per second [m/s], times the mass m in kilograms [kg], you receive a force F measured in 1 Newtons [N]. ie: F[N] = ma [kg*m/s] (1) This is verified in basic high school physics classes. This phenomenon is used to develop more complex explanations of reality. *****Why then do you state this is incorrect, when we see that the relationship used in (1) does in fact relate the quantities of mass and acceleration to Force? What is the Zetas view on this? [b]Did you miss the part where mankind is so far off, so wrong, in their math, that a conversation with them using human math as the language would be babble. YOU cannot understand. Thus, you request for a conversation in your babble with the Zetas is declined. [/b]http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s54.htm [/quote] Which translated means that Nancy doesn't know shit about math or physics, so we can't discuss anything that involves even the most basic principles of mathematics and physics, because all Nancy can do is babble incoherently about these topics and look stupid. To avoid having to answer questions involving math and making herself look incompetent, the cover story is that human math is wrong, and beneath the intelligence of the Zetas, and we are too stupid to understand Zeta math, which among other things does not use the number or the concept of zero, this number being a primitive number in human math. (Go ahead, try it. Withdraw all your money from the bank and see if the result is anything but 0 dollars). Forget that the person asking the question gave a very simple and basic example of how human math and physics can be verified, applied, tested and replicated. Nancy doesn't understand this shit, so it is bogus. End of story. ROFLMAO. [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>