Users Online Now:
2,327
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
691,037
Pageviews Today:
1,211,902
Threads Today:
516
Posts Today:
8,680
02:25 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Prof_Rabbit:MV84MTQ3MzlfMTQ3MTI0NTNfREZERjBFOEU=] [quote:Circuit Breaker] At one time, someone presented the mathematical calculations showing how much energy would be released and what it was equivalent to....something like detonating nuclear devices all over the world every minute. I don't remember exactly what it was. Anyway, none of the bunkers have presented anything that disputes that...nothing that shows it would be survivable. [/quote] Yes, here is my take on some of the observations; According to Nancy the Earth stops first then turns 90 degrees in one hour, the Earth currently spins at 1,100mph, one quarter of a turn requires 6 hours, ergo a turn speed of 6,600mph. Part A - where we stop the Earth rotation. Now 70 percent of the Earth's surface is water, if you stop the Earth's crust from rotating the water will attempt to keep going, not sure? pour a glass of water over a basketball. Easy to see. So all that water will roll over everything, Mt. Everest included, all this at faster than the speed of sound. Part B - where we flip the Earth 90 degrees. Now all that previous water is beginning to settle back into the basins from where it came, now you tilt the Earth 90 degrees at 6,600,mph, for a very brief time the water will try to stay in place due to inertia however once it's moving the water is now moving at 9 times the speed of sound. That amount of water at that speed will scour the Earth's surface right down to bedrock. Now throw in the mega upheavals claimed to the Earth's crust, the massive movements to the Earth's tectonic plates and you now have an Earth's crust that is molten rock, yes the entire planet, the seas turn to super heated steam. You are dead! And now the energy figures. [quote:Anonymous Coward 88145] of course animals and plants did and will survive. humans always DID survive. they are likely to survive the shift itself, but NOT likely to last long after it There has never been a pole shift as Nancy describes it. There isn't the first shred of evidence for one. Now, about the survival of such a calamity. Fist of all, I have seen no one describe what the mechanism by which a pole shift is supposed to happen. Nancy's "magnetic" arguments are laughable in light of the fact that the earth's iron core is spherical and the earth's magnetic field is extremely weak...only strong enough to barely move the needle in a toy compass. By what does Planet X "grab" the earth in order to stop it's rotation and flip it on its side? Second, even if the earth could be "grabbed" by something to stop its rotation, the energy that would have to be dissipated is HUGE. But it's easily calculated. The rotational energy of the earth (of mass 6x10^24 kg) is 2.58 x 10^29 Joules. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotational_energy This rotational enegy HAS to be dissipated in order to stop the earth's rotation. In other words, a non-rotating earth has ZERO rotational energy...to get from rotating to non-rotating, 2.58 x 10^29 Joules MUST be dissipated as heat. The energy of the atomic bomb that decimated Hiroshima was 6.3 x 10^13 Joules. http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2000/MuhammadKaleem.shtml Thus, the rotational energy that MUST be dissipated to stop the earth's rotation is 2.58 x 10^29 J / 6.3 x 10^13 J, or the equivalent of 4.1 x 10^15 Hiroshima bombs. In longhand, that is 4,100,000,000,000,000 Hiroshima bombs. Nancy has claimed that this would occur in one hour or less. Do you think that anyone would survive over 4 million- billion Hiroshima atomic bombs going off over the course of one hour? [/quote] Ps. (Thanks to 88145) If this were evenly distributed over the 197 million square miles of the earth's surface, http://pages.prodigy.net/jhonig/bignum/qland2.html this would be the equivalent of 4.1 x 10^15 / 1.97 x 10^8, or almost [b]21 MILLION Hiroshima atomic bombs per SQAURE MILE![/b] If distributed evenly through the volume of the earth (260000000000 cubic miles) http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLR_enUS222US222&q=volume+of+earth+square+miles this would be the equivalent of 4.1 x 10^15 / 2.6 x 10^11, or just under 16,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs per cubic mile of rock. Now, who thinks that any living organism would survive such a disaster? [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>