Users Online Now:
1,668
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
662,937
Pageviews Today:
853,347
Threads Today:
222
Posts Today:
2,890
07:27 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:mclarek 986233:MV84MTQ3MzlfMTc0MTI3NDdfNzQ5MzJEQkM=] [quote:Menow 995685] code writing. Let's say (I'm making this one up as an example): MARC CoLLIns LYNN M. ARCher ARroio LIMA [LI-MA} and so on. :meds: [/quote] Nope. They've figured out how it was done. It's how they're bunched in name-groups in the coding to this day. Maybe now they'll scatter it. Here you go -- ignore the work-in-progress beginning part. Try to get a sense of the overview point before locking in on mistakes. The work here starts about how they found names at ALL in the mess of the pages, how hard it is to get photos for some which are removed identities ("page not found" but it was, once, a name), etc. And from the split-up info an the coding level -- the spooks named these photos [b]DEAdheads[/b] (yup, that's their coding for them) ... some researchers have put together roughly how they do it. When YOU read though since so many of you are HIGHLY PREJUDICED not merely against the idea but also the people who would do the work to figure out the hypothesis and face the evidence ... when you read then, EXTRACT the info, the gist: how many problems there are and what kinds. Don't get hung up on some mistake or individual inconclusive aspect, as I mentioned. http://septemberclues.info/vicsims/9-11-9%20the%20Vicsim%20Report.pdf pp. 4-7, pp. 9-47 (this is where the name problem is discussed AND the "commenter" names, too, for memorial log books). The gist, the repeatable problems with exact similar types of problems are what you will notice. The rest of the paper isn't that good -- as I said -- because though she shows the method for the photos, her examples are poorer than at http://septemberclues.info/vicsims_photo-analyses.htm And here is the list of names, which they foun very hard to extract (it is sub-divided and incomplete, and pages are missing, and the databank boots you out so you can't do the full searching -- it only searches part at a time). http://septemberclues.info/vicsims/Vicsim%20List.pdf The list has been changing slightly, though, it seems. So they ask anyone doing comparative research to keep track of when they got their results. [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>