Users Online Now:
2,153
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
891,287
Pageviews Today:
1,588,610
Threads Today:
676
Posts Today:
11,986
06:09 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 705842:MV84MTQ3MzlfMTMyMTM0ODhfRDA3NTYxMTM=] [quote:Reality420 725815] Good day. Here's a couple charts I threw together to address claims of 'Exponential Earthchanges'. The two charts are plots of Mag7+ EQs and Atlantic Hurricanes. I've made them small enough that maybe they could be used as smilies by the paid members should they wish to display them in a post. Links: Mag7+ EQs : http://img198.imageshack.us/i/mag74xsm.gif/ Hurricanes : http://img196.imageshack.us/i/hurricanes4xsm.gif/ Explanation - EQ data source: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/epic/epic_global.html Hurricane data source: http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/ The EQ data contain the number of EQs per year for the 36 years 1973-2008. The Hurricane data contain the number of *Atlantic* Hurricanes for the 14 years 1995-2008. The Dark Blue Line is the trace of the yearly data. The Light Blue Line is the Mean Value (Average) of the data set. The Medium Blue Lines are the +/- 3 sigma values for the data set. The Yellow Line is the exponential curve taking the initial value as the year 2000, and the final value as year 2012. The 2012 final value is equal to four times the year 2000 value. The reasoning for these values is as follows: - Nancy began claiming "exponential" EQs and 'earthchanges' around year 2000. I am not sure of this, but to apply to the 'Great Non-Appearance' in May 2003 the date is probably pretty close. - She never stated at what level they would rise to from "normal", merely stating that the "common man" would be walking around "stunned". I figured minor increases wouldn't qualify. 2x increase? Doesn't seem "doomy" enough for a killer planet. 4x increase? That would certainly garner some serious attention. It still isn't end-of-the-world doomy, but I figured it would be a good, arguable minimum. If she's going to claim that the Orange Orb of Oblivion is only going to double major EQs that's a pretty sorry excuse for a doomsday planet. (Even at 4x it could be considered a doomsday slacker) - Mag 7+ - Pretty much anything lower doesn't cause doomy destruction. What is she going to claim - PX is gonna' get you with a swarm of Mag 5s that nobody feels much anyway? - I've taken the date out to 2012 for the "Galactic Alignment" worriers so the exponential curve will be even steeper to have it happen before 2012. - I've only included Atlantic Hurricanes since Nancy and her delusions seem fixated on the USA. I wonder why that is? Maybe the PXers & earthchangers can look at the yellow lines and understand what "exponential increase" means. BTW- That old devil PX sure has been roiling up the sun in the last few years hasn't it?<sarcasm> In 2003, coming off solar max., all sun activity was evidence of PX. I would guess solar inactivity is also evidence of PX. The sun is active? --> PX. The sun is inactive? --> PX. The weather is cold? --> PX. The weather is hot? --> PX. The weather is moderate? --> PX. Have fun. R. [/quote] Great info. Thanks! The bunkers just don't get it. And Nancy certainly doesn't. She's been claiming increases (not only increases, but "exponential" increases for years) but the data simply is not there to support her claims. [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>