Users Online Now:
2,097
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
1,089,150
Pageviews Today:
1,515,125
Threads Today:
410
Posts Today:
7,357
12:29 PM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:**ZetaMax**:MV84MTQ3MzlfMjM1NDU1MDhfNjc2RjY2REI=] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444] [quote:**ZetaMax**] [quote:Anonymous Coward 74444] [quote:**ZetaMax**] Do you really think I'm going to "downgrade" the importance of my vision after listening to Ed Dames' latest pronouncements????? [/quote] No. What I wonder is why you believe Ed Dames pronouncements mean anything to the veracity of *your* vision when *he* has been so consistently wrong. Same with Nancy. Why do you keep looking for validation of your visions with external sources and authorities with such awful track records? How are you "picking" said authorities? [/quote] I think the question is why YOU "believe" there is no chance of his being right "this time"? Some people really do "eventually" learn from their mistakes. Why are so quick to beleive that 25 years of remote viewing has taught Dames NOTHING????? [/quote] Because he continues to be wrong -- and all evidence shows that he hasn't learned from past errors (to the point where he doesn't ADMIT past errors, same as Nancy). Some people DON'T learn from their mistakes. From all appearances (and no offense meant), you seem to be one of them. Certainly Dames and Lieder don't. How many times must Dames fool you before you *finally* dismiss his core ideas as 'in error?' And, again: How are you "picking" said authorities? If not by their past performance (since Nancy and Dames continue to wallow in the 'ridiculously wrong' category) then how? [/quote] >> [i]How are you "picking" said authorities? If not by their past performance[/i] They pick "me". In other words, I simply come across their work at a time where their message resonates with whatever train of thought I am entertaining at the time. [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>