Users Online Now:
1,363
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
233,632
Pageviews Today:
312,615
Threads Today:
94
Posts Today:
1,393
02:39 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Setheory 869850:MV84MTQ3MzlfMjU0OTk3NDNfOEQ5RjMzQUY=] [quote:Menow 1417891] [quote:Setheory 869850] [quote:Menow 1417891] Sad truth is, Nancy Lieder was able to take the outraged reaction to her crazy claims and characterize it as an organized attempt to cover up her "truth". Without that, I think she wouldn't have ever gotten as far as she did. I have no doubt that was the plan from the beginning. [/quote] Are you saying that the successful debunking of her claims and predictions actually served to bolster her following? [/quote] It was not "sucessful" in the eyes of those who tend to believe her story. She took the debunking and ran with it on her site, cherry-picking and recharacterized it as "shrill" and "fearfull" and "angry" and "paid" and the like. Nancy packaged her story and all the lies it entails in one place which became linked-to over an over and over again. There are some debunking sites, but nothing which has been maintained with the ferver and passion and dedication which Nancy has shown for hers. The people who have bought into Nancy's story don't look at the details, they go by "feelings" and the like. They accept what Nancy says on emotional basis, for the most part. Her story appeals on an emotional level. The level of detail which is needed to debunk Nancy's claim are simply lost on most of those who prefer to think they are "awakened" and "noticing" things that the government has hidden from them. The most important aspect of Nancy's story is that of evil conspiritors controlling our lives. Without that, her story has no backbone, so yes, I think debunking has served a planned purpose in Nancy's(and/or those who put her where she is) agenda. [/quote] That is an interesting take and I actually agree with some of what you are saying. I believe that debunking of the Zetas/Nancy has actually helped limit the number of her followers. That being said, it may have actually strengthened the resolve of her hardened core of believers. I’m talking about the truly devout that shuns all reason and has emotional investment in the idea. The ”us vs. the world” mentality can certainly cement the cohesiveness of such a group. [/quote]
Original Message
Debunker Talk Live Chat May 15
Feel free to quote
ANY
poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.
Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last
Six
years to provide
ANY
truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd
Failed
predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".
Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on
Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!
PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.
Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>