Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQzMjg2NDlfN0U5QUE0REE=] [quote:Jesse Sovoda:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQzMjc5ODFfOEZDQjM0OEY=] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQzMjY1NDBfRTVERkQ1MTQ=] [quote:Jesse Sovoda:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQzMjYzNzlfQjNBMzQyQzE=] I suppose I incorrectly determined value to be equivalent to relevancy. [/quote] Here's an illustration of how it's difficult for us to guess the relevancy of something... Whatever is prevalent in your perspective now is highly relative to it and, thus, to you. If an old, rotting ham sandwich is nearby it is [u]more relevant to your current perspective[/u] than your mother whom is not. Take a look around you. Each in your perspective has a high degree of relevancy. This may be obvious to you if you are at home. But it does not stop there. Walk outside. The people you pass, the strange things you see, the smells, the experiences, etc. All more relevant than that which you think is more relevant to your perspective. Just an example of how it's difficult for our "conscious mind" to know the value of something, and easier for the Genius (the "sub-conscious") to know it because it is the one doing the calculations, so to speak. [/quote] Thank you. I feel like you used relevancy and value as equivalent terms in this post too. I may be missing something. [/quote] Apologies for the lack of clarity. Imagine that everything in your reality is assigned a number (a value) from the dust to the photons to the television. When we add all of these values up we get an other number, a sum that represents your perspective. For this example let's say that sum is 72 Further, let's say that "36" is more relevant to "72" than "73" is (for 36x2). Many other values surrounding "72" are not as relevant to it than "18" or "9", for example. Putting 72 next to 74 is not as energy-efficient as putting it next to 36 or 144. So in your "72" perspective, there are values everywhere but not all similar values are equally relative. We can determine the value of something by observing, in a way, that which surrounds it. hope this helps to clarify. [/quote]
I have been living in this world for some time now.
I came from a place also named Earth, much like this planet. There are a number of differences between my home and yours.
I thought it would be interesting to share a few things with you that are relatively common knowledge where I am from. My reasons for doing so will probably be more apparent in the future.
* Consciousness does not exist (but relationships do)
* Matter is gravity that has been structured
* We are not human (we are perspectives)
* When the totality of something cannot be grasped, it appears infinite.
* Space is not physical
* There is no "now" or "here", but relationships.
We use a kind of language like you use numbers here. Numbers, representations of abstract concepts, were 'invented' to work more easily with the world around us. Our language is no different.
If it were invented today it would probably be thought of as existing in parallel with science. A new kind of science.
This language also enables the shifting of perspective like a kind of mental technology. Some of you may find it quite interesting.
If anyone is interested in learning more please let me know.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.023s (3 queries)