Users Online Now:
GLP Poker Rooms
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:* * *:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQ1NDA1MjZfMjY5NDlFQzY=] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQ1Mzk3NTNfRDUxM0JCN0E=] [quote:* * *:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQ1Mzg0MzZfNDlEOTMxNEY=] [quote:dodec 20177375:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQ1MzE5MzdfNEIwRUREMDA=] [quote:* * *:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQ1MzEyMDlfOEJDRTRDMjU=] Hi guys, I have an Ecsys question, which I didn't ask almost a year ago now, because I thought I must just not be understanding it. (I may have asked back then, but never got an answer. Mind is blurry.) Any way, now that I've studied and learned more, there is still something that's confusing me. Can someone please explain to me how -S+I = [u]N[/u]O ? [b]1. Isn't the neuronicon for [u]N[/u]O = -S+P[/b] I keep reading -S+I as [u]K[/u]ILO from the pronunciation chart http://ecsys.org/_files2/ec-language-chart.jpg But on this page http://ecsys.org/EC-language.php , under Using "EC: 1 - English-to-EC" it says the word for "constitution" is pronounced oo-n-ing. In the side paragraph, it says "Let's then say the next icon is ([i]neutral)Symbol[/i] and +Interaction." [b] 2. I read this as [u]G[/u]O = S+I ; Is this correct?[/b] But then above the second neuronicon in the graphic for constitution, neutral Symbol and high Interaction is noted as -S+I [b]3. Wouldn't [i]neutral symbol[/i] be S (no "-")?[/b] Any help greatly appreciated. This is what stopped me from moving forward confidently before. Thank you!! [/quote] -S / I = Do -s / P = [u]H[/u]ello kilo = -S / +I no = -S / +P [/quote] Okay, thanks. So there are some typos on that page (which I found very hard to believe, hence my mad confusion!): Word "constitution": (From the text) [i]The first icon of the word has an input of [color=darkred]+Symbol and an output of (neutral)Logic[/color]... the next icon is [color=green](neutral)Symbol and +Interaction[/color]... the last icon is [color=blue]-Interaction and +Logic[/color].[/i] [b]Proper definition:[/b] [color=darkred]+SL[/color][color=green] S+I[/color] [color=blue]-I+L[/color] [b]Proper pronunciation:[/b] th-g-ing [color=darkred][u]TH[/u]INK[/color] [color=green][u]G[/u]O[/color] [color=blue]S[u]ING[/u][/color] On that page, it says the pronunciation for constitution is "oo-n-ing", which is way different than "th-g-ing". Please let me know if I'm still off, but if not, it clears up a lot for me. Thanks! [/quote] Good catch, and my apologies for the confusion with the example graphic. It has been corrected. [/quote] Ahhhhh, [b]THANK YOU <3[/b] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzQ1Mzk3NTNfRDUxM0JCN0E=] See you in a ~month, everyone! (And see some of you in your dreams) X [/quote] Yes. x EDIT: There is still a typo in the example graphic: The second icon ([u]G[/u]O) should [i]not[/i] have the box on the input. I'm just adding this here so those who are new to it don't get confused and give up. It is quite easy, now that I know the sample matches my understanding of the language. Woohoo! [/quote]
I have been living in this world for some time now.
I came from a place also named Earth, much like this planet. There are a number of differences between my home and yours.
I thought it would be interesting to share a few things with you that are relatively common knowledge where I am from. My reasons for doing so will probably be more apparent in the future.
* Consciousness does not exist (but relationships do)
* Matter is gravity that has been structured
* We are not human (we are perspectives)
* When the totality of something cannot be grasped, it appears infinite.
* Space is not physical
* There is no "now" or "here", but relationships.
We use a kind of language like you use numbers here. Numbers, representations of abstract concepts, were 'invented' to work more easily with the world around us. Our language is no different.
If it were invented today it would probably be thought of as existing in parallel with science. A new kind of science.
This language also enables the shifting of perspective like a kind of mental technology. Some of you may find it quite interesting.
If anyone is interested in learning more please let me know.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)