Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyNDA0NTFfNEQwMUNDOTk=] [quote:panoukos:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjU3MjdfNTFGQjQ0QTA=] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjMyMTFfQjAxNTJGNjE=] Death, to the few who really subscribe to X in my world, is more of a myth [/quote] what this myth is about? and what purpose does it serve? [/quote] There are stories about death and physical change. Like any myth, I suppose the purpose is to tell a story using the most basic of concepts. [quote:panoukos:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjU3MjdfNTFGQjQ0QTA=] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjMyMTFfQjAxNTJGNjE=] Externalizing the desire or want provides us with new perspective. So "wishing" could actually make what we want (or think) more clear. [/quote] Sure, but as you said: [b]It may be difficult to define what it is you actually want.[/b] So, if defining a wish precedes the perspective, and if somebody who doesn't (know how to) wish, stays on his "default" perspective, then it makes me wonder, not only how and by whom the First wish was produced, but also what is the actual wish (which has produced my current perspective) that I am seeking to experience? It couldn't be from "me" (because if I don't know how now, i couldn't know "back then") Would that be right? [/quote] Nothing precedes the perspective. One does not come before the other. Think of the new perspective as having an effect on all directions (past/present/future). There is no default perspective. We experience what is most relative to us, all things considered. The knowledge of knowing how (to wish, or whatever we want to call it) does not dictate the experience. It is experienced regardless of whether or not we think we know what we are doing. [quote:panoukos:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjU3MjdfNTFGQjQ0QTA=] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjMyMTFfQjAxNTJGNjE=] Why would one want to reach a singular perspective? Then the experience would be nothing. [/quote] I don't know. My post was simply following you on this: [b]"It's all your perception. If some of your perceptions are good while others are bad, then it is difficult to see your reality as a single perspective."[/b] Not that my following on you was not false (you didn't reply to it anyway) [/quote] If the intention is to reach a singular perspective (as a state of being) then the experience would be nothing, as there would be no conflict or drama. There would be nothing to perceive. However, if the intention is to consider your reality as varying aspects of what you are then it would be difficult to do so if you wanted to attract some values while resisting or rejecting others. We can consider ourselves as being all things in our perspective without the emptiness of actually being a single perspective. Apologies for not being more clear about this. [quote:panoukos:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjU3MjdfNTFGQjQ0QTA=] [quote:Chaol:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyMjMyMTFfQjAxNTJGNjE=] You are as much a [b]singular perspective[/b] now as you will ever be. An "expanded perspective" would entail knowing/understanding/experiencing going from bottle to bottle (rather than not knowing) and doing it consciously. As this is simultaneous [b]you may experience what seems like multiple perspectives at once.[/b] However this is still one bottle-perspective in the same way you are experiencing that now with all of the perspectives of your physical body. [/quote] Do you identify "singular perspective", "expanded perspective", "experiencing what seems like multiple perspectives at once" with "the experience would be nothing"? Or have I misread you here? Please clarify Thank you very much for taking the time to reply to my posts. [/quote] By "You are as much a [b]singular perspective[/b] now as you will ever be," I mean that the illusion of perspective is an illusion. A singular perspective dictates that nothing is there with which to compare, and thus to know. So we are all ready what we seek, if we are seeking a singular perspective. We are all ready "nothing" and this "something" is an illusion. [/quote]
I have been living in this world for some time now.
I came from a place also named Earth, much like this planet. There are a number of differences between my home and yours.
I thought it would be interesting to share a few things with you that are relatively common knowledge where I am from. My reasons for doing so will probably be more apparent in the future.
* Consciousness does not exist (but relationships do)
* Matter is gravity that has been structured
* We are not human (we are perspectives)
* When the totality of something cannot be grasped, it appears infinite.
* Space is not physical
* There is no "now" or "here", but relationships.
We use a kind of language like you use numbers here. Numbers, representations of abstract concepts, were 'invented' to work more easily with the world around us. Our language is no different.
If it were invented today it would probably be thought of as existing in parallel with science. A new kind of science.
This language also enables the shifting of perspective like a kind of mental technology. Some of you may find it quite interesting.
If anyone is interested in learning more please let me know.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.004s (3 queries)