Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:panoukos:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyNzEyNTlfQjg0QjI1QUM=] [quote:Unit3:MV84NzI1OTBfMzUyNTkwODhfQzYxMkM0OTY=] I think acceptance is huge. When we execute a Genius, there is no way we can know all the variables that need to take place to make what we want to happen. [b]And probably,[/b] if we did, we would never want to use one. That's why I think it's better to make Point B as simple as possible and also make it the side issue...such as the [b]keys[/b] to my house on the Riviera rather than a house on the Riviera. [/quote] Unit3, forgive me but you remind me of an old joke, where somebody is having a flat tyre in the middle of nowhere, in the middle of the night and doesn't have a jack. He looks around him and sees light on the top of a nearby hill. On his way there (to ask for a jack), he imagined potential dialogues with the housekeeper, based on his idea that he will annoy them. So after a lot of "I will tell him that and he will reply this, and then I will counter reply that and he will re-reply this", he reaches the door, he knocks it, a woman opens it and with an angry tone, points his finger at her and says: "Fuck you and your jack!" and turns around and go. What you say, is that if you choose to make more relative to your experience something that you already have in mind and represents what you truly want, will include a lot of variables that maybe some, or all of them will be "bad" and not make the experience "worth" it. If, on the other hand you pick a wish that will possibly have less variables, that you can easily imagine them, will make your experience "worth it". Therefore, it is the "controlability" of the variables that you imagine will stand between you and what you want to experience, that asks what you want to experience. If that is the case, then you dont have to ask what you want to experience and why, ask what variables you want to experience before you experience the whatever "thing". But it won't take you anywhere, will it? Nevertheless, we go back to the same. If what you want to experience is already "in you" and have only to reveal it (make it relative), then the whatever "variables" that will pop up will also come from you. With this way it is making it impossible to wish for something that you really want to experience and be of "lower value" to any of the potential variables that you meet. If it is, then it wasn't what you "really" wanted to experience. You haven't "define it" properly. Can't blame the Genius or Ec for it, or whoever suggested it to you. What you've asked is what you get. If you are not "happy", know what you ask. However i can see the "problem" you, Jesse, me and other face. We think that point B is in the realm of our imagination. But this realm is blurry to us. But since we live in our imagination/dreams (our subjective world, as we call it), the realm of reality also looks blurry (because we always see reality from the perspective of our dream). So, it seems that defining point A is the hard bit. If you know where you are, you can know where you want to go. If you dont, any point B can be equally "right" or "wrong". But ask about A is asking what you see, whereas asking about B, is asking what you believe. It seems to me that we have been shown the most powerful tool ever been invented by a human being and dont know what to do about it (yet). [/quote]
I have been living in this world for some time now.
I came from a place also named Earth, much like this planet. There are a number of differences between my home and yours.
I thought it would be interesting to share a few things with you that are relatively common knowledge where I am from. My reasons for doing so will probably be more apparent in the future.
* Consciousness does not exist (but relationships do)
* Matter is gravity that has been structured
* We are not human (we are perspectives)
* When the totality of something cannot be grasped, it appears infinite.
* Space is not physical
* There is no "now" or "here", but relationships.
We use a kind of language like you use numbers here. Numbers, representations of abstract concepts, were 'invented' to work more easily with the world around us. Our language is no different.
If it were invented today it would probably be thought of as existing in parallel with science. A new kind of science.
This language also enables the shifting of perspective like a kind of mental technology. Some of you may find it quite interesting.
If anyone is interested in learning more please let me know.
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (3 queries)