Users Online Now:
1,970
(
Who's On?
)
Visitors Today:
81,843
Pageviews Today:
107,310
Threads Today:
27
Posts Today:
426
12:49 AM
Directory
Adv. Search
Topics
Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
Subject
Theoretical WW3.......what would the sides be?
User Name
Font color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
Black
Font:
Default
Verdana
Tahoma
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:MrCash:MV85NTY1ODdfMzE0NTEwMDBfNUNDQzk4Mjc=] There will be no WWIII since everyone is one of our "closest and strongest allies" and "punches above their weight"....except Denmark. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erYpXzE9Pxs[/youtube] [/quote]
Original Message
So hypothetically speaking, if something in the middle east sparked a world wide conflict, what would the sides be for the big world powers?
It seems like China, Russia, Germany (maybe), Iran, North Korea area on one side.
US, UK, other European countries, who else?
Not only are we outnumbered but our side is run by bankers who could give less of a shit about us or our countries. So what would be the outcome?
Pictures (click to insert)
General
Politics
Bananas
People
Potentially Offensive
Emotions
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Textual
Doom
Misc Small Smilies
Religion
Love
Random
View All Categories
|
Next Page >>