Users Online Now:
Donate To GLP
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
REPLY TO THREAD
HISTORY CHANNEL****FOR SHAME***AMERICAN PICKERS
Ms Sans Serif
In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.
[quote:Anonymous Coward 3924471:MV85Njg4MzVfMjc5NDk3MThfOUE4RjZGMDg=] [quote:Anonymous Coward 4545177:MV85Njg4MzVfMjc5NDY4MzNfNkM1NDgzNjk=] LOL. I support the show, I actually found this googling for thier website because I have some neat shit to unload from cleaning out a garage. This country is built on buying or building cheap and selling high. If you ho's knew what the ps3 or new flat screen you have cost to build vs what you paid, you'd kill yourself. How about that american made automobile? 10 - 20,000$ profit each. Don't be mad because you slave minimum wage at your dead end job, and aren't smart enough or creative enough to do what they are doing. History channel is winning hard with thier new programs over the last 5 years. Nobody wants to watch shit about the evolution of cotton and all the wars america didn't win are tired and played out, nobody cares anymore. Keep up the good work history, some welfare moms, and house husbands just like to complain to complain. [/quote] The History Channel and other niche channels have no integrity. Mr. Marshall sums up the integrity issue quite well. .... "Here is the problem: if a project, enterprise, or mission has to turn into something else entirely to achieve what its management considers success, then it has already failed. If the original objective was worth pursuing, then integrity and honesty requires that either new leadership dedicated to the core mission be recruited, or the project should end." .... "Having the Cartoon Channel run by people who don’t like cartoons, or the Soap Opera Channel run by people who think soap operas are stupid, or the History Channel operated by suits who think history is boring, is unfair to the vision, the mission, and the audience of those channels." "Yet the Sci Fi Channel was placed in the hands of executives who looked upon science fiction and its fans as obstacles to profitability. As a result, even if their business model “succeeds”, the mission of having a science fiction cable channel will have failed. The absence of integrity is fatal." ~ Jack Marshall http://ethicsalarms.com/2010/12/28/syfy-and-the-absence-of-integrity-a-case-study/ [/quote]
I can NOT believe that the HISTORY channel would show such a disgrace to our older generation. TO think for one minute this would somehow be cleared to air is appalling. To brag or somehow boast about an unsolicited visit to Leland's farm and the price paid versus the actual value should be illegal. If this would have been my granddad I would have felt robbed of my family heirloom and treasures. The History Channel should immediately cancel this show!!!!!!!!!!!!! We were so looking forward to a new show that was really about hidden treasures in American not thievery we couldn't even finish the show.
These guys are scum bags !!!!! Nice job History Channel way to promote thieves . I would love to meet these guys face to face , and work a deal out with them. If you know what I mean ! And my parents always told me crime doesn't pay, unless you make a show for the History Channel .Way to teach kids its ok to steal from the older generation. History Channel you should make things right pay these people fair price for their stuff, and fire these dirt bags
Pictures (click to insert)
Big Round Smilies
Aliens and Space
Friendship & Love
Misc Small Smilies
View All Categories
Next Page >>
Disclaimer / Copyright Info
with questions or comments about this site.
"Godlike Productions" & "GLP" are registered trademarks of Zero Point Ltd. Godlike™
Website Design Copyright © 1999 - 2017 Godlikeproductions.com
Page generated in 0.005s (5 queries)