Godlike Productions - Reply to Thread

Users Online Now: 1,272 (Who's On?)	Visitors Today: 231,615
Pageviews Today: 296,527	Threads Today: 59	Posts Today: 969
02:29 AM

REPLY TO THREAD

Subject **** the LARGEST RESEARCH FRAUD in medical history !! ****

User Name

Font color: Font:

In accordance with industry accepted best practices we ask that users limit their copy / paste of copyrighted material to the relevant portions of the article you wish to discuss and no more than 50% of the source material, provide a link back to the original article and provide your original comments / criticism in your post with the article.

[quote:Catseye 896024:MV85OTI4MTdfMTU2MTA3NzdfMzE5NjBBRDY=]
I'll admit there are some good drugs out there.  But you have to know what kind of problem to let a medical doctor treat.  I agree that if I was a 21 year old male, I would certainly consider any problem involving sex to be a crisis situation and I would do whatever I had to do to fix it, within reason.

Hydergine does sound interesting.  But the site I just brought up to check out spoke about tests on cats.  Apparently, it increases oxygen flow to the brain by dilating blood vessels.  This does sound very helpful.  But they tested it by reducing blood flow to some cats' brains.  The cats without treatment showed brain damage within five minutes.  The ones that were treated lasted 45 minutes before they died.  Which brings up another bad point for drug usage:  the horrible torture of innocent animals who wanted no part of this.  I think they should do the tests on the stockholders and the doctors since they obviously already have brain damage.  They want the money, then they take the risks.  Again, I am talking about drugs for chronic disease conditions.  Virtually all chronic diseases are easily treated by diet and supplements, which can manipulate the body quite effectively, and since they aren't "new" to the body, they don't have dramatic side effects.  But the "cost benefit" analysis has obviously already been done and they have put an "acceptable" number on human death and suffering.

I've emailed the American Cancer Society, which is home of the biggest lie about cancer (that they are searching for a cure) and I never get an answer.  Gee, imagine that!  Nobody there wants to tell me  how they are taking public money that we are giving them to search for a "cure" but they insist on only searching for a "patentable cure".  Oh yeah, I forgot to add, in the articles where they say the only give grants for patentable cures, they also say they want a piece of the patent.  How's that for a public soliciting charity that is showing us pictures of bald children and telling us that there's hope?  Just a bunch of greedy bastards like in the drug industry.

How can you trust an industry that profits more when we are ill?  And how was this monumental conflict of interest allowed to happen in the first place?  I think the Rockefeller post is a big hint.  Do your homework people, know when to get treatment from a medical doctor and when to get it from a doctor that has studied actual health care and not drug sales - one qualified in recommending proper diet and supplements.  That doesn't mean every naturopath out there, only ones who have been to good schools.  Anyone can make an educated guess, but you want doctors who are using lab tests to make their recommendations.  They are just doing different tests than the regular medical doctors who are following their protocols and looking for drugs to give you.  Some medical doctors refer to these other health care doctors as "quacks".  But any medical doctor treating a chronic disease is the real quack.  But how else are they going to afford their country clubs, nice cars and fancy homes?  With repeat customers, of course.  The real doctor is the one who doesn't have these repeat customers.  They are few and far between, but they are out there.  I found one.
[/quote]

Original Message It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history.

[link to www.naturalnews.com]

Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.

His research study, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex is a safe and effective drug.

There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study!

And it wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.

The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted. And an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years.

What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry.

Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.

Pictures (click to insert)





\| Next Page >>