Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,794 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 798,457
Pageviews Today: 1,034,457Threads Today: 222Posts Today: 4,281
09:46 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Bigfoot rape

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908113
United States
03/06/2010 03:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Bigfoot rape
There is a thread about a man from hong kong claiming to be huge with his 6 inch penis.

Another guy is mad because he got banned from GLP because he said he liked bondage porn.

These guys should meet up and get busy. Maybe tie each other up to a tree like that women in the park and let a bigfoot rape them. I'll film it and admit I like it and then get banned and the hung kong fella will see bigfoot's foot long and feel like crap.
dance dance dance
][nfeRnaL
User ID: 763295
United States
03/06/2010 03:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
putin clappa LOL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 902888
United Kingdom
03/06/2010 03:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
wthread
SOARINGHAWK (OP)
User ID: 908113
United States
03/06/2010 03:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
wthread
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 902888



I don't know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908010
Canada
03/06/2010 05:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
hmmm, I recall seeing a youtube vid that claims to have captured a bigfoot with a boner on film!

no shit!

I'll look.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908010
Canada
03/06/2010 05:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
This is the bigfoot boner film.

I first saw it in the context of a documentary.

Supposedly a film crew were making a movie in the woods (California?) and some were in an RV at night going back into town when they saw this:



wtf

your guess is as good as mine
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 908113
United States
03/06/2010 05:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
This is the bigfoot boner film.

I first saw it in the context of a documentary.

Supposedly a film crew were making a movie in the woods (California?) and some were in an RV at night going back into town when they saw this:



wtf

your guess is as good as mine
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908010



LOL you went and found the video. I couldn't see the boner.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908010
Canada
03/06/2010 05:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
more boner stuff:

[link to home.clara.net]

"The Redwoods Video
In 1995, a film crew in California claimed they had caught another Bigfoot on camera. Jeff Meldrum, Associate Professor of Anatomy and Anthropology, and Richard Greenwell of the International Society of Cryptozoology took a look at their evidence.
Watch the video (requires RealPlayer)

Enhanced version of the video (requires RealPlayer)

Misty clouds shroud the northern California coastline as twilight settles on the towering trees of the Jedediah Smith Redwoods State Park. The date is 28 August, 1995. The driver of the 11m-long recreational vehicle (RV) pulls onto a small side road so that his passengers — a tv film crew from Waterland Productions — can take a closer look at the majestic scenery. Music plays, beers froth and the ever-present video camera is running as the crew members relax after a long week's work.


A fleeting glimpse of a dimly lit figure, caught on video, but the film crew who saw it were convinced it was no ordinary man.Suddenly, the driver glimpses a shadowy movement at the periphery of the headlights. "Look! It's a f---ing bear!" he shouts to his companions. Eager to catch it on video, the cameraman zooms in on the retreating figure. Through the rain, the crew see what they take to be a massive, shaggy bear. It walks upright, arms swinging at its sides, around a slight bend in the road some 30m or so ahead. "Let's go get it!" someone shouts.

The driver accelerates forward as the hirsute figure glances warily back. But instead of the protruding snout of a bear, there is a flat, human-like face. "That's not a bear," one of them realises. "What is that?" asks another. The driver brakes to an abrupt halt as, without warning, the apparition steps in front of the oncoming vehicle and crosses the road in the direction of the nearby Smith River. The headlights reveal a hair-covered giant, towering nearly 2.5m (8ft) tall. "Switch to full beam," someone urges. Taken aback by the bright beams, the figure raises its arms defensively, then moves with unhurried deliberate strides, pausing momentarily to glare back with a "what-the-hell-are-you-doing-here?" expression. "Oh my God ... it's Sasquatch!" someone exclaims. The astonished crew take in the sloping brow, broad flat nose, high flaring cheekbones and broad well-muscled neck and shoulders.

And then the giant vanishes behind a massive redwood tree. In all, fewer than 30 seconds have elapsed. Attempts to follow it are futile in the rainy darkness. The witnesses huddle in the RV to examine their video and assess their surreal experience. Driving back to Los Angeles, they wonder whether they should go public with their video — and risk the reactions of a sceptical audience, When challenged by an interviewer some months later, one of the witnesses resolutely replied: "I saw what I saw. That's all I can say."

What did they see? The Sasquatch, or Bigfoot, is a supposed giant primate from western North America. Its status is highly controversial. Footprints, eyewitness reports and a previous film shot in 1967 by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin — have failed to convince a sceptical scientific community, though some scientists retain an open mind on the subject. We approached the new footage in that spirit.

The video depicts a fleeting, dimly lit image of a bulky, striding, bipedal figure initially seen at some distance (about 32 metres) in the periphery of the headlights, then at close proximity (about 4.5m). One of our first objectives was to establish some scale by which we could determine the size of the subject. Starting from the factory specifications of the RV, we were quickly able to corroborate the witnesses' impression that the subject stood nearly 2.5m tall, After a site visit — and some careful measurement of trees visible in the video — we arrived at a height of about 2.3m. The subject in the video clearly wasn't just an ordinary man.

The next step was to compare the new video to the Patterson-Gimlin film shot in 1967. Several similarities were apparent — not only in facial features but also in body form and proportion. On the other hand, we were also impressed by some obvious differences. The Redwoods' video subject is apparently a male and has particularly long and shaggy hair, especially on the extremities, whereas Patterson and Gimlin filmed what appears to be a smaller female, with a sleeker coat and obvious breasts. Sex differences in hairiness are found in other primates, such as the orang-utan.

After careful study of the Redwoods video, we were able to discern numerous additional details. One series of frames, for instance, shows the action of the gluteal muscle of the buttock during walking. The insertion of the gluteal muscle is marked by a shadowed furrow. Above and forward of this region there is a reflective spot that could be shin with the hair rubbed off. This spot corresponds to a bony protuberance on the thigh bone just below the skin surface known as the greater trochanter. This subtle detail appears in precisely the appropriate anatomical position, suggesting a worn spot acquired from sleeping side down or from rubbing a hip against a tree.


"an anatomical detail not reported previously in Sasquatch encounters"The Redwoods film may also reveal an anatomical detail not reported previously in Sasquatch encounters — the male genitalia. As the subject passes in front of the RV, a reflective object can be seen at the front of the body, just below waist level. The object in question has a thick hair-covered base and a reflective, tapering portion that curves upwards in a sickle shape. One interpretation is that the subject is displaying an erect penis, perhaps as a form of threat — as has been observed in some other apes.

As the subject vanishes into the darkness behind the redwood tree, we are afforded a last informative glimpse of the leg and foot. The heel is very broad, the ankle thick, and the calf lacks the characteristic taper and straight line of the human Achilles' tendon. Significantly, the heel of the visible trailing foot comes off the ground while the midfoot appears to remain in contact with the ground until it pushes off and the entire foot swings forward. This is quite different from the action of the human foot, in which heel and mid-foot lift together, but characteristic of an ape's foot with its more flexible joints. All the signs are that the bipedal Sasquatch walks with a gait distinct from that of humans.


Unlike the action of the human foot the video shows the creature's heel rising while its midfoot stays in contact with the ground.These are just the highlights of our analysis, which has encompassed on-site inspection, interviews with witnesses, consultation with video enhancement specialists and careful scrutiny of the subject in the film. In all this, we have detected nothing to falsify the testimony of the witnesses. In fact, we have noted numerous anatomical features on the video that are highly suggestive of and consistent with the image of a large, bipedal, non-human primate. Nevertheless, we always keep one overriding thought in mind when evaluating cryptozoological evidence: the witnesses were there and we weren't. It is certainly possible that the witnesses in this case — given their Hollywood connections — could have pulled off a spectacular hoax. It is even possible that all of the thousands of Sasquatch reports, including the hundreds of cases of tracks found, have been due to hoaxing (and perhaps some misidentifications).

In our view, there are only two hypotheses about the Sasquatch, both of which seem improbable. 0ne is that the Sasquatch doesn't exist and the thousands of reports are spurious. The other is that a giant, non-human, bipedal primate inhabits the forests of the US Pacific North-west and western Canada and has so far eluded conventional scientific observation. One must decide for oneself which is the least improbable of the two.

Meanwhile, the search for decisive proof continues. As this goes to press, we are embarking on our second month-long Bigfoot expedition, when we will be using infra-red light, invisible to primates' eyes, combined with special night-vision cameras. Perhaps, this time, we may bring back conclusive evidence that will settle the Bigfoot debate once and for all.


Footnotes
Reports of a supposed giant primate from North America first came to prominence in the late 1950s. Giant human-like footprints were found at road-construction sites as the wilderness of northern California was opened up to logging. The reports, documented by photographs and plaster casts, resulted in the name 'Bigfoot', but the creature was also known as 'Sasquatch', an Anglicised Indian name for 'wild people', first popularised in western Canada. Eyewitnesses related startling encounters with giant upright apes, but their stories were ignored by both the authorities and the scientific community.

The study of these and many subsequent track casts and the two films has revealed quite a bit about the possible anatomy of this supposed giant ape but much less about its possible behaviour and ecology. Eyewitness reports — now numbering more than 2,000 and involving more than 3,000 witnesses — suggest that the Sasquatch could be a largely nocturnal, solitary, shy omnivore.

The fossil record affords a tantalising clue to the biological identity of the Sasquatch. There once existed an ape that stood 2.5 - 2.75m tall and was possibly bipedal. This giant ape, known as Gigantopithecus, lived in Indochina, where three of its enormous fossilised jawbones and more than 1,000 isolated teeth have been found.

Gigantopithecus is thought to have become extinct as recently as 500,000 years ago (300,000 years ago according to some experts). Conceivably, it may have hung on until now, and today's Sasquatch could be descended from forms that crossed from Asia to North America via the Bering Land Bridge that connected the continents during the Ice Age.

Article from BBC Wildlife magazine, September 1998."

The original film I saw had sound and a voice over describing the incident. It was longer than the 40 seconds shown on youtube.
speedonezero

User ID: 908376
United Kingdom
03/06/2010 09:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
oh dear, what a load of shite wtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 880683
United States
03/06/2010 09:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
thread of the week here folks... classic GLP at it's finest. 5 stars
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 908113
United States
03/06/2010 10:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
thread of the week here folks... classic GLP at it's finest. 5 stars
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 880683


5a
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 880683
United States
03/06/2010 01:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908348
United States
03/06/2010 02:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
That's a big WTF, Buddy.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 908113
United States
03/06/2010 05:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
bump
Frigg Stuyvesant

User ID: 621289
United States
03/06/2010 05:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
thread of the week here folks... classic GLP at it's finest. 5 stars


5a
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908113

Make that a double!
Cui Bono?
Frigg Stuyvesant

User ID: 621289
United States
03/06/2010 05:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
I met one of the BFRI investigators when I was bartending some years back.


He was surprisingly non woo woo.
Cui Bono?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 906238
United States
03/06/2010 05:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
[link to www.i-am-bored.com]
Epic Beer Man

User ID: 297515
United States
03/06/2010 06:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
Possible Pin Material here mods.
:minimoran:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 897971
Slovenia
03/06/2010 06:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
There is a thread about a man from hong kong claiming to be huge with his 6 inch penis.


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908113


could you gie me a link to this thread please?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908743
Canada
03/06/2010 06:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
There is a thread about a man from hong kong claiming to be huge with his 6 inch penis.




could you gie me a link to this thread please?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 897971


Thread: I am well HUNG, how do I make it more comfortable for women?

I am well HUNG, how do I make it more comfortable for women?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 908113
United States
03/07/2010 02:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
There is a thread about a man from hong kong claiming to be huge with his 6 inch penis.




could you gie me a link to this thread please?


Thread: I am well HUNG, how do I make it more comfortable for women?

I am well HUNG, how do I make it more comfortable for women?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908743


He's William Hung
Mister ObviousModerator
Forum Administrator

03/07/2010 02:05 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
2facepalm2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 880683
United States
03/07/2010 03:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 872174
United States
03/07/2010 04:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
This post needs the big foot.
wtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 560401
United States
03/07/2010 04:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
That wasn't a Boner; that is what we call a Schlong..
deanoZXT

User ID: 873874
United States
03/07/2010 04:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
Link to the woman tied to a tree in Tacoma thread.
Thread: Naked Woman Found Tied To Tree
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 908113
United States
03/07/2010 04:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
I met one of the BFRI investigators when I was bartending some years back.


He was surprisingly non woo woo.
 Quoting: Frigg Stuyvesant



Did he tell you any interesting stories?
deanoZXT

User ID: 873874
United States
03/07/2010 04:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 906238

You all have to watch that vid. Made me laugh a lot then I thought about and cried. But I stared to laugh again.
crazyjak
Frigg Stuyvesant

User ID: 621289
United States
03/07/2010 06:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
I raped Bigfoot.


It got weird..
Cui Bono?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 909509
United States
03/07/2010 06:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
There is a thread about a man from hong kong claiming to be huge with his 6 inch penis.

Another guy is mad because he got banned from GLP because he said he liked bondage porn.

These guys should meet up and get busy. Maybe tie each other up to a tree like that women in the park and let a bigfoot rape them. I'll film it and admit I like it and then get banned and the hung kong fella will see bigfoot's foot long and feel like crap.
dance dance dance
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908113

do drugs much??
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 907296
United States
03/07/2010 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Bigfoot rape
A well hung bigfoot.
Related Threads

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob