purported highjackers still alive and 2 airplanes that purportedly hit WTC still flying | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
SICK MAGGOT 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THAT BECAUSE THE 2 PLANES THAT HIT THE WTC WHERE NOT AIRLINER AT ALL THEY WHERE REMOTE CONTROLLED PLANES WITH NO CREW. THE ONLY REAL AIRLINER IS THE ONE THAT AS BEEN DOWNED BY THE AIRFORCE SUPPOSEDLY DIRECTED OVET THE WITHE HOUSE STRANGELY AND COINCIDENTLY THE ONLY UNSUCCESFULL TARGET. I DOUBT THEY WILL BOMB THEMSELF.AHAHA |
Chosen1 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You guys are crazy..we all saw the one plane hitting the world trade center after the first one hit...it was right before your very eyes.. at least those that were watching on tv that day. How could you deny that what happened didnt occur? It makes no sense. I personally think that this kind of talk is an affront to the people who lost loved ones in that disaster and enough is enough..drop it.. There was no friggin conspiracy ..it was an act of terrorism. Or ..are you the type that just has to hang on stirring up crap to make people even more distrustful of our government and each other? Our country doesnt need this .. Be realistic.. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | TCTO parts are replaced because they DO wear and are subject to failure after their specified life. Certain parts MAY be reinstalled after refurbishing and inspection by the mfg. Rarely will an aircraft leave with the same parts it came in with. If it ainīt flyinī it ainīt producing revenue. |
Circuit Breaker 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
??????????????? 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i agree that the world saw the towers hit--but i also agree that the serial#s of parts would prove it conclusively and that has not been forthcoming--even when one of the engines was found blocks away from the towers. BUT ATTAīS barely singed? passport was laying on top of a pile of smoldering trash blocks away--and was found???????????? |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | serial#s of parts would prove it conclusively --- that is the ID of the planes that were used--my bad---to many open loose ends for such diasters and the resulting carnage that is still going on. Asimple part serial # could put an end to a lot of the speculation. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Iīve often wondered if the reason Flight 93 was shot down - if it was Flight 93 - was not because the "hijackers" had control of the plane, but because the passengers had successfully regained control. No way they could allow that plane to land and have the truth, whatever it is, exposed. Note that seismographic and other evidence prove conclusively that flight 93 crashed at 10:06am yet the cockpit tape released by the government ends abrubtly at 10:03am as the passengers allegedly begin to charge the cockpit. The FBI and FAA have refused to even discuss this discrepancy, much less the contents of the missing three minutes. |
captain obvious 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The official release of the FAA numbers of the airplanes that were supposedly involved in the WTC collision are available for all to read. If they are bonafide, why are 767īs with the SAME numbers still flying? If you are trying to debunk a post, at least read what it says and make your observations on point. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "If they are bonafide, why are 767īs with the SAME numbers still flying?" Is there some law or regulation that states tail numbers canīt be reassigned? And where are these planes? Just because someone said theyīre still flying doesnīt make it so. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
captain obvious 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Emperor Kenton 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | These threads then are all bush*t by someone wanting people to think that their government did this. They said, even showed an RB-66eīs engine part, on the ground at the Pentagon. Hereīs the problem; by using volumetric fuel to air rrate ratios mixtures, ignited, you get volumetric capacity of the explosion itself. In otherwords, you take x amount of fuels, then plot an action ratio coordiance, over what the dilution of that fuel will do, when held in suspended mass, within set coordinates. Both of the said passenger planes, were carrying a tremendous amount of internally held fuels stores. When those planes slammed into the WTC building, their plotted airspeed, was about five hundred miles per hour. When the planes went into the building, that very fist micro to nanosecond, you start to have mass to energy conversion. On the film that was offered here, a while back which states that the one side of the aircraft did not have a port wing, did you notice how clear the port side photo of the WTC building was? Okay, could have been J-peg, m-peg compression, or a new splice of film transposed over an existing one? The side moving series officered by curious, shows in detail, all the affects from a massive amount of fuel, being diluted into an air fuel mixture, as both the mass of the airplane and the jet engine parts, start their mass energy conversion. Right on schedule, mixtures of fuel air effects are started to be shown, coming out the camera facing side of the building, however only about a quarter of the way through on the building. You can do a volumetric capacity in air suspension ignition by including an overhead graph, blocked, of what the useful fuleload was, against the all seen ignited fuel, shown throughout the entire sequence. As a matter of fact, this would be easy to do. Even the plane hitting the Pentagon. I donīt trust a certain sect which is an offset of a certain religious party, concerning their involvement in the new data, that has been released, as these people have also been harassing aerospace posting boards, as well as other places. The new proposal that our government did this, look very closely at, before you pile on this band wagon? |
Chosen1 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
INTERESTING ARTICLE 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | .....The defenders of the official version of 9/11 inevitably ask how so many people could keep a secret. "Wouldnīt someone have blown the whistle by now?" is the constant challenge by the champions of denial. How naïve they are. At the higher levels of government the issue is NO longer about SECRECY, but about SURVIVAL. The extent of the 9/11 CRIMES are so great that a very real scenario of self preservation has arisen. Exposing the TRUTH about 9/11 would virtually mean the END of the United States of America as a viable power. If the good people in our government and in our intelligence community EXPOSED the truth, America would NEVER ever regain its credibility in the world. We would never again be respected or trusted. We would immediately relinquish our leadership position in the world and sink to the position of a rogue nation that had COMMITTED an unforgivable atrocity against its OWN people for political purposes. We would expose the huge betrayal of trust that has been developed and nurtured over our 230 year history as a nation...... MUCH MORE will post the link if some one wants |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is better to be humble and honest than to be filled with pride and dishonest. True healing and true survival for you, your children, and your childrenīs children is founded on TRUTH. Festering cancer and death for you, your children, and the end of all generations in a global nuclear holocaust is founded on LIES and DECEPTION. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circle squarer 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The tail number of Flight UA 93, which was supposed to have crashed in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001, is 591UA. (reference: see the beginning of the second paragraph under the header "Background" at: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Frequent United Airlines user Mr Friedman kept a log of all the flights he flew on during 2003, including details about their crews and the tail number (N-number) of the planes. He recorded that on April 10, 2003, he flew on a United Airline Boeing 757 with tail/N-number N591UA. See his flight log at: [link to friedmanfamily.org] and look under the date column 04/10/03 for the row named "Tail" (the tail number). Moreover, he correctly lists the type of plane he flew on that day with the same tail number as Flight 93 as a Boeing 757. Given that, according to his log, he flew on nine different types of planes between 01/02/03 and 04/10/03, the chance of him flying on a Boeing 757 on April 10 is about 10%. Either: 1. his log is a subtle joke to fool 9/11 conspiracy investigators for whom he has no time. If that is the case subtle is the word, for not even many such investigators would recognise the tail number of Flight 93 if they read it, whilst the log is a single, obscure webpage and not part of a personal website, so he is not trying very hard to advertise his misinformation; 2. Friedman accidently made a false entry that coincided with BOTH the type of plane that was supposed to have crashed on 9/11 AND with its 3-figure tail number (what are the chances of that?!); 3. Flight 93 did not crash into a field in Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001 and United Airlines was still using this plane in April, 2003. You decide. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bullshit! 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh BULLSHIT!!! Pres. Clinton canīt get a blowjob in the oval office without the whole world knowing, yet you want us to believe that EVERYONE who KNOWS THE TRUTH about 911 is too scared to say anything AT ALL about it. You are BULLSHIT!!! BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think this type of conspiracy theory could be started deliberately by the intelligence agencies to deflect our attention away from why they totally failed in their mission to protect our country from this type of attack. They blew it totally, our tax dollars were wasted, we suffered as if those agencies didnīt even exist, and they donīt want to lose their jobs over it. |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you believe that, you will believe anything. A ridiculous, vacuous explanation for something you cannot bring yourself to believe actually happened, even when startling evidence is presented in front of your nose only two or three replies ago! |
GREY LENSMAN 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | PERPLEXING TO SAY THE LEAST. PARTS, CRITICAL, YES THEY GET REPLACED. THEN THE NEW PARTS ID ARE INCLUDED IN THE MAINTENACE LOG. THIS IS VITAL TO TRACE PARTS IN FAILURE ANALYSIS. MYSTERY. I SAW THE PLANE FLY INTO THE SOUTH TOWER, LIVE ON CNN, IT WAS A 767. SO HOW COME THE ENGINE FOUND ON MURRAY WAS THAT FROM A 757. THAT HAS ME REALLY BUGGED. CAN WE GET THIS STRAIGHT. SINCE WHEN HAS DEMANDING TO KNOW THE TRUTH, POINTING OUT OBVIOUS ERRORS AND OMMISSIONS AND FALSEHOODS, SINCE WHEN HAS THAT BEEN DISRESPECTFUL OF THE DEAD. I MUST ADMIT, SEEING THE SLOW MOTION VERSIONS, SPPOKS ME. IT FEELS AND LOOKS VERY WRONG. YES A PLANE FLYING AT "FULL SPEED" INTO A BUILDING IS WRONG BUT LOOKING AT IT, IT JUST DISAPPEARS, JUST INSTANTLY FADES AWAY. I REALLY FIND THAT HARD TO EXPLAIN. THE ONLY THING YOU SEE FLY OFF IS THE ENGINE, THE 757 ENGINE. TAIL NUMBERS ARE VITAL EVIDENCE OF TITLE, THE DEEDS TO THE PLANE, THEY ARE NOT READILY CHANGED EXCEPT FOR EXAMPLE CHANGED OF FLAG, WHEN THEY ARE DEREGISTERED. NEITHER ARE THEY DUPLICATED OR RE-USED. GL |
Anonymous Coward 12/08/2005 10:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ""BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT BULLSHIT"" Once again a most eloquent post adding some much needed information to the topic.THANKA YOU MUCH The black boxes would solve it.Fireman were supposed to have found them.What is on them? |