South Korea/North Korea confrontation could signal WWIII, Act 3 has begun . . .

FROM FEBRUARY 21st:

[link to www.webonomix.com]

North and South Korea May Start World War IIIby Webonomix Reporter




Cited: AP


In January, South Korea was thinking about a preemptive strike against North Korea. They believe they must act immediately if North Korea gets ready for nuclear attack. In fact, South Korea’s defense chief called for a pre-emptive strike on January 20 against North Korea if there is a clear indication the country is preparing a nuclear attack.


Meanwhile, a state-run think tank predicted a military coup, popular uprising, a massacre or mass defections after North Korean leader Kim Jong Il dies. Kim, who turns 68 next month, is believed to have suffered a stroke in 2008.


The comments and speculation — made even as officials from the two Koreas discussed further developing a joint industrial complex in the North — are likely to anger Pyongyang, which recently threatened to break off dialogue and to attack Seoul.


North and South Korea have remained locked in a state of war and divided by a heavily fortified border since their three-year conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953.


The United States, which backed South Korea during the war, has 28,500 troops stationed in the South to protect the ally against any threat from the communist North.


After a decade of warming ties, relations between the two Koreas turned frosty in 2008 with the inauguration of conservative South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, who has called on North Korea to stick to its disarmament commitments.


Recent reports of a South Korean contingency plan to handle any unrest in the isolate North raised Pyongyang’s ire, with the North threatening to launch a “sacred nationwide retaliatory battle” and to cease all communication with the South.


‘Immediately launch a strike’

If there is confirmation of North Korean intention to wage a nuclear attack, South Korea should “immediately launch a strike” on the North, Defense Minister Kim Tae-young said Wednesday in Seoul.

For those who would like to think of something other than World War III . . . Why not purchase sports tickets to the Super Bowl! Or maybe you could go to a concert or to the theater. If we do just make sure you get the best concert tickets available.


Kim, who was speaking at a seminar, made similar remarks in 2008 when he was chairman of South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, comments that prompted North Korea to threaten to destroy the South.


Unrest in North Korea is a distinct possibility in coming years, the Korea Institute for National Unification said in a report posted on its Web site late Tuesday.


The think tanks said Kim Jong Il probably won’t survive past 2012, though it cited no evidence for its speculation. His death could touch off a military coup or power struggle unless he manages to stabilize succession plans soon, the report said.


Kim is believed to be grooming his youngest son to take over as leader of the nation of 24 million.


The think tank also speculated that Kim could delegate much of his authority to brother-in-law Jang Song Thaek, a member of the all-powerful National Defense Commission, until the son — now in his 20s — is able to take over power.


The North Korean leader himself succeeded his father, Kim Il Sung, in 1994 in communism’s first hereditary transfer of power. The institute also said a collective leadership, or another figure, could emerge to rule the country after Kim’s demise.


Disarmament negotiations

The speculation about the future of the impoverished, isolated country comes as envoys from neighboring nations seek to convince the regime to return to nuclear disarmament negotiations.


Pyongyang quit the six-nation disarmament talks also involving China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States in anger over international condemnation of a long-range rocket launch last April. The regime carried out an underground nuclear test the following month in defiance.


North Korea has shown some willingness to return to the talks, but recently demanded that sanctions be lifted first. The North also called for a peace treaty to formally end the Korean War, saying the agreement would help end hostile relations with the U.S. and promote the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula.


The U.S. has rejected the demands for a peace treaty or a lifting of sanctions.


“It would be inappropriate at this juncture to lift sanctions,” Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell told reporters January 19 in Washington.


South Korea’s top nuclear negotiator, Wi Sung-lac, left for the U.S. on January 20 for talks with Stephen Bosworth, Washington’s special envoy to North Korea, and other officials.


Meanwhile, South and North Korean officials continued to discuss their joint industrial complex in the North Korean border city of Kaesong, Unification Ministry spokesman Chun Hae-sung said. They also met January 19. Kaesong is the most prominent symbol of inter-Korean cooperation. About 110 South Korean factories employ some 42,000 North Korean workers.


In late January . . .


On the western sea border of North Korea, to no sail zones were issued. Then, an official stated that escalating tensions on the divided peninsula caused North and South Korea to exchanged artillery fire along that western sea border on January 20.


North Korea fired about 30 rounds of land-based artillery from its coast, an officer at the Joint Chiefs of Staff in Seoul said.


South Korea, in response, immediately fired about 100 warning shots from a marine base on an island near the sea border, the officer said on condition of anonymity because of department policy.


He said no casualties or damage were immediately reported, and that the North’s artillery fire landed in its waters while the South fired into the air.


Top presidential secretary Chung Chung-kil convened an emergency meeting of security-related officials on behalf of President Lee Myung-bak, who was making a state visit to India, according to South Korea’s Yonhap news agency. It said Lee was informed of the incident.


No-sail zones

The exchange of fire came two days after the North designated two no-sail zones in the area through March 29 in a possible indication it may be preparing to conduct missile tests or other military exercises there. The zones include some South Korean-held waters.


In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley told reporters that it was trying to determine precisely what might be behind the North’s no-sail zone designation.


“In any kind of declaration like that we would encourage restraint on both sides,” Crowley said before the exchange of fire.


The western sea border — drawn by the American-led U.N. Command at the end of the 1950-53 Korean War — is a constant source of tension between the two Koreas, with the North insisting the line be moved further south.


Navy ships of the two Koreas fought a brief gun battle in November 2009 that left one North Korean sailor dead and three others wounded. They engaged in similar bloody skirmishes in 1999 and 2002.


The North has sent a series of mixed signals to the South recently. It offered talks on restarting stalled joint-tour programs and a military dialogue on a joint industrial complex in the North earlier this month. The rival countries are scheduled to hold separate nonmilitary talks on the industrial park in the North Korean border town of Kaesong next week.


But the communist country also has escalated its rhetoric, with leader Kim Jong Il’s all-powerful National Defense Commission threatening to attack the South and break off all dialogue over a reported South Korean contingency plan to handle turmoil in the North.


South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-young said last week that his military should launch a pre-emptive strike on North Korea if there was a clear indication that the country was preparing a nuclear attack. The North responded by threatening war.


The two Koreas are still technically at war because the 1950-53 Korean War ended with an armistice, not a formal peace treaty.



FROM: [link to www.threeworldwars.com]

World War 3 TimelineThese are, I believe, the stages of the planned Third World War:

Prelude - The events leading up to the start of World War Three, including Sept 11, 2001.
Act 1 - The Middle East. Widespread conflict to bring the entire region into the flames of war, possibly triggered by Iran or militants in Pakistan using North Korean supplied nuclear arms. The first Scene in this Act is the US Invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003.
Act 2 - Israel at War -- Against her Arab neighbors, possibly Palestine. A Palestinian State will be established, so that all Israelis will be fully separated from Palestinians (listen out for mention of a 7-year treaty to be confirmed by a World Leader - probably Bush), only for Israel to viciously attack Palestine shortly thereafter.
Act 3 - Far East -- "Hair-raising nuclear confrontation that threatens mankind's existence" - Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script, p. 223, written in 1981. Includes China invading Taiwan and a nuclear eruption on the Korean Peninsula. Act 4 - Erosion of Confidence in 'The System' so severe citizens will be panicked into giving up liberties and Constitutional form of government. The plan calls for the dissolution of the US Constitution, triggered by a significant enough 'terrorist' attack. The ultimate intent is to introduce a global government and one-world religion.
Act 5 - The collapse of the US, and other Western economies and morals.

Act 6 - Significant population reduction using natural and man-made disasters.
Curtain. Who can tell how this war will end?
Both Biblical prophecy and the Illuminati plan state that Israel is the key. The Third World War is planned to begin when Israel goes to war against her Arab enemies. Then, and only then, will all the other elements begin to occur and they will do so in rapid succession. The plan is to have one disaster following another in such rapid succession that, before people can mentally and emotionally handle one disastrous news event, they will be hit with another. It is also accurate to say that until ALL of the elements for WW3 are in place, the plan will not commence.