Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,447 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,550,993
Pageviews Today: 2,158,565Threads Today: 596Posts Today: 11,645
06:30 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

 
SunDawnn

User ID: 835300
United States
04/04/2010 07:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
WOW! Very interesting videos I just spent 2hrs plus listening to all 26 video's.


One point I may have missed is which world ,power had the ability to launch a stolen Russian Nuke from the Atlantic ocean?

You would need the technical know how, plus you would need a sea based platform to launch the Nuke. Most likely a submarine or a modified tanker. Either way Sat photos taken at the time in the Atlantic would have given a later visual I.D. of the sea platform.

Dimitri never says who might be the culprit in such an attack. AND why would they steal a Russian Nuke, Launch a Russian Nuke, and then not ARM a Russian Nuke?

As always the question is WHO benefited most from 9/11 happening.
 Quoting: Prophet 850811



Yes. I am not clear about that either.




Shock?
Missile/plane confusion?
Plane bouncing off opposed to being absorbed.

I just can't imagine why he thinks he saw a plane.


The FACT is, the "planes" we saw on TV were fake.. that has been established. Now, what happened in the real world is a different story, and there are a few possibilities;

1) There was nothing except pre-planted explosives at the impact floors

2) Some kind of missile impacted the towers, large enough to be seen by observers, and in the confusion/brainwashing afterwards convinced people it was a plane

3) There were plane/s flying in the area, a "fly-by" was done to imprint the real image of a plane into peoples minds. Most would see the plane but not the actual moment of impact. TV fills in the rest.

4) Combination of 2 + 3


Personally, i go for number 1. Why? Because it has less risk (no physical evidence), and because i know just how easily people can be manipulated, programmed and brainwashed, ESPECIALLY with a highly charged emotional event, and ESPECIALLY when the media is involved. TV is THE most powerful psychological weapon EVER devised. Period. And of course peer pressure.. if everyone "saw" an impact and you didn't, would you stand up and say "hey, i didn't see that?". 99% of people wouldn't.. fear of ridicule, and lack of confidence in your own mental ability (especially when everyone else is telling you otherwise!).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 499484




Yeah....shock can evoke a lot of controversial behavior.

My brother is/was sane.
However, I was/am from the cheering team of 'no planes but missiles hit the WTC and Pentagon' so it's hard for me to understand why my brother of 50 years is saying that.

Having never been witness to such an event (I was upstate NY at the time), it's hard to say why people reacted the way they did (and concluded to what they saw). I have a feeling....TV (plus shock) was much of the culprit that day!
Facilitating The Flow
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 548111
United Kingdom
04/04/2010 07:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
WOW! Very interesting videos I just spent 2hrs plus listening to all 26 video's.


One point I may have missed is which world ,power had the ability to launch a stolen Russian Nuke from the Atlantic ocean?

You would need the technical know how, plus you would need a sea based platform to launch the Nuke. Most likely a submarine or a modified tanker. Either way Sat photos taken at the time in the Atlantic would have given a later visual I.D. of the sea platform.

Dimitri never says who might be the culprit in such an attack. AND why would they steal a Russian Nuke, Launch a Russian Nuke, and then not ARM a Russian Nuke?

As always the question is WHO benefited most from 9/11 happening.
 Quoting: Prophet 850811


He says the following in comments section of the final video:

"Thanks. I don't want to name here the one who did it, for even though I didn't name anyone yet, by now I am already marked on some chauvinistic web site as 'potentially harmful to Jews and/or Israel'."

That seems like a fairly strong hint to me.
SunDawnn

User ID: 835300
United States
04/04/2010 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
4 hours watching these videos!

Thanks!


Looks like you'll have to buy the book to find out whose behind 9-11


Not sure what I think now..................
Facilitating The Flow
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 914422
United States
04/04/2010 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
There are some interesting points here EVERYONE seems to be missing:

1) The point about the site being called "ground zero" is something I never considered before. "Ground zero" really does refer to a nuclear blast site.

2) The fact NOTHING has been built there after all of these years. It seems so weird.

3) If there was an underground nuclear blast, I would expect some radiation, but not enough to cloak the whole city in it. So I'm not surprised some people came down with sickness but it was explained as asbestos, etc. This could be covered up, in other words, it is not inconceivable. So people will say, "Oh, there would be radiation everywhere!" Would there be? I'm not so sure. It also explains why the materials were quickly carted off.

4) The siesmic readings, the ground shaking ten seconds or so before the collapses, this lends some credibility to the theory of an underground nuke going off.

5) However, he says there was no "thermite", which then erases the evidence OF thermite and even the video evidence of squibs. I'm baffled as to where he is coming from on that point. Use of a nuclear device, to me, would not preclure the use of further explosives to ensure the buildings fell. Of course, the use of demolitions indicates to me some kind of pre-planning, because I don't think for 30 years the buildings sat there pre-fitted with explosives. That would have to at least be maintained, as wiring failures would occur over that span of years. However, a pre-fit nuclear option could have been in place. Again, even if this nuclear option was used, but USA was still somehow a "victim", I find it hard to believe there was no pre-knowledge.

6) His contradictions are many: says a Russian missile struck Pentagon, but it wasn't the Russians. It wasn't Bin Laden. Who the hell was it?

7) Says USA was a "victim", yet we managed to use video trickery to turn missiles into planes. Wouldn't that require an enormous amount of pre-planning? And doesn't pre-planning indicate complicity?

8) Says "white plane" over D.C. only used for nuclear attack -- interesting point.

In all, he offers some very interesting theories, but to say USA was a "victim" seems odd in light of the level of coordination and pre-planning required to erase missiles and turn them into digital planes, in addition to the bogus claim of 19 hijackers of which some are still alive, in addition to the planeloads of people who vanished, in addition to the bogus cell phone calls...

He seems to dispense of one wacky claim only to use another to support his theory. You sort of have to take them all in as one whole.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/04/2010 07:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
4 hours watching these videos!

Thanks!


Looks like you'll have to buy the book to find out whose behind 9-11


Not sure what I think now..................
 Quoting: SunDawnn

he is drawing from his past experience, his own research on the web, and information directly from the FBI.

one of these things just dont belong here, one of these things.....

i buy the nuke thing. its the closest to ever making sense. the thermite was necessary to breach the buildings like a plane had gone in. this wasnt done on the fly.

bush knew. he had the same look on his face as he did when he got caught with that sheep as a teenager.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 934427
United Kingdom
04/04/2010 07:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
You do realise that when the first building was hit fkg hundreds of people where looking at those towers from the street...im sure alot of them would have mentioned at some point that there was no plane involved....

The government silenced them all maybe, I don't think so...

bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/04/2010 07:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
1) The point about the site being called "ground zero" is something I never considered before. "Ground zero" really does refer to a nuclear blast site.
 Quoting: Plagued_Souls


oh my, isnt that the truth. the fact that they have gone through and changed the definition is a crime against humanity. they didnt add the second and third meanings that current events gave us as an understandably changing and living language. no. they expunged the ONLY meaning "ground zero" had before 9/11, which only referred to nukes. it was synonymous with NUKES.

that is not excusable. its an admission of guilt!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/04/2010 07:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
You do realise that when the first building was hit fkg hundreds of people where looking at those towers from the street...im sure alot of them would have mentioned at some point that there was no plane involved....

The government silenced them all maybe, I don't think so...

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 934427

lets try to keep the level of evidence above what you(or anyone else) think.
SunDawnn

User ID: 835300
United States
04/04/2010 07:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
You do realise that when the first building was hit fkg hundreds of people where looking at those towers from the street...im sure alot of them would have mentioned at some point that there was no plane involved....

The government silenced them all maybe, I don't think so...

bsflag
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 934427




I remain opened minded as far as "how this was pulled off" (I do NOT believe in the OS) so..............what you ask/say is interesting.
To that I ask: Where are the photos/videos of the hundred/thousands of people whose eyes where upon these towers?
Facilitating The Flow
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/04/2010 07:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
4) The siesmic readings, the ground shaking ten seconds or so before the collapses, this lends some credibility to the theory of an underground nuke going off.
 Quoting: Plagued_Souls



the discipline of reading these signatures and fully developed. but as usual, you only get the best science you can afford these days. this could be self taught and researched by a commited researcher.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/04/2010 07:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
To that I ask: Where are the photos/videos of the hundred/thousands of people whose eyes where upon these towers?
 Quoting: SunDawnn


very good question. you would think there would be hundreds of camcordings of this event. and cameras. its new york, for heavens sake! show me the youtubes.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/04/2010 08:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
He seems to dispense of one wacky claim only to use another to support his theory. You sort of have to take them all in as one whole.
 Quoting: Plagued_Souls


i agree. there are some things that work and some things that dont. the things that work, work like gangbusters. the nukes and the missiles. it seems to me that someone did use at least one missile on the pentagon. it looked more like our global predator in that pentagon guard shack video.
SunDawnn

User ID: 835300
United States
04/04/2010 08:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Wait! Dimitri was gonna name the 9-11 perpetrators (and they will get to that later.....) then the video ends?


Hey now!

If I paid, I'd want my money back.
Facilitating The Flow
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 934467
Puerto Rico
04/04/2010 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
spock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 788353
United States
04/04/2010 11:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 932587
United States
04/05/2010 01:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706857
United States
04/05/2010 01:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
no planes
not one
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 788353
United States
04/05/2010 06:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 687593
Sweden
04/05/2010 07:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 499484
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 07:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Wait! Dimitri was gonna name the 9-11 perpetrators (and they will get to that later.....) then the video ends?


Hey now!

If I paid, I'd want my money back.
 Quoting: SunDawnn


"So, you ask who was the chief organizer of 911?

Actually, I have already mentioned it on my web site that I don't want to reveal it online, otherwise, people will have less insentive to buy my book (and I don't have any income, except from the book, unfortunately, so it is just a matter of my survival). But it is OK to me - I will make an exception to this rule if you really want to know it, but don't want to buy the book...

His name was Mike Harari - a former Deputy Chief of the Mossad, a former friend of President Bush Senior, and a former deputy of General Noriega - the Dictator of Panama."

[link to www.clubconspiracy.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 788030
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 08:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
His name was Mike Harari - a former Deputy Chief of the Mossad, a former friend of President Bush Senior, and a former deputy of General Noriega - the Dictator of Panama.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 499484


-Caveat Lector-

why mention michael harari?

4,000 isrealis had day off on 9-11

instant messages to isreal warned of attack

by far the most intense censorship of conspiracy
'theories' online have involved what is deemed
anti-semitic, i.e. anti-israel [the equivalent of
saying it is unamerican to question US foreign policy]

the MEDIA was quite in place for coverage

public sentiment was beginning to turn pro-palestinian
and against israeli policy

since 9-11, the israelis have managed to pour into
palestine and wreak havoc...and pull out just in time
for the overcoming of kabul - with FAR less
international press coverage than they were getting
before the event, when the oppression was nought
compared to the last two months

the mossad saying 'by deception shalt thou make war'

harari is called the fixer

harari enjoys the protection of london as an employee
of the isreali embassy there even though norway wants
his ass for masterminding dozens of political killings
there

harari's connections to the bush enterprises are
thorough...he was in charge of operation watchtower -
the program of drugs to LA gangs for money for guns
for nicaragua - read more below

Prosecutors in Norway have issued an international
arrest warrant for a former Israeli intelligence
agent, suspected of involvement in the mistaken
killing of a Moroccan man nearly twenty-five years
ago.

Read more:
[link to www.mail-archive.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 499484
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 08:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
harari enjoys the protection of london as an employee
of the isreali embassy there even though norway wants
his ass for masterminding dozens of political killings
there
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 788030


I wonder if this "dipolat" was him!

"'Mossad boss' expelled from Britain over passport killers"

[link to www.mirror.co.uk]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 928875
Canada
04/05/2010 09:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
WHO HERE was actually in NEW YORK and SAW a plane hit the world trade center?



My brother, who worked in one of the adjoining buildings (not in the complex itself but near Verizon) said HE SAW the second plane coming in. He said he saw it from his office window.

I've questioned him time after time after time and he does not budge from his position.

I know the poor guy had to walk home that day, to New Jersey (a long ass hike) full of debris and dust and in total disbelief and it's there that I wonder if he just fell victim to what the media was saying and spinning that entire day/evening (about the second plane).

I don't want to think my own brother was delusional nor does it bode well with me to think he's a bi-product of mass media brainwashing but.....he DID vote for Bush in 04. So......I just don't know what to think anymore.

I've been on 9-11 TruthMovement ever since 2002!
 Quoting: SunDawnn



I agree with you, I think the no plane theory is bullshit.

But the fact that the buildings were pre-wired with micro nukes makes sense from the start. You don't build huge buildings like that without a plan of taking it down without harming other buildings. They had to have preplanned it all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 09:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Wait! Dimitri was gonna name the 9-11 perpetrators (and they will get to that later.....) then the video ends?


Hey now!

If I paid, I'd want my money back.


"So, you ask who was the chief organizer of 911?

Actually, I have already mentioned it on my web site that I don't want to reveal it online, otherwise, people will have less insentive to buy my book (and I don't have any income, except from the book, unfortunately, so it is just a matter of my survival). But it is OK to me - I will make an exception to this rule if you really want to know it, but don't want to buy the book...

His name was Mike Harari - a former Deputy Chief of the Mossad, a former friend of President Bush Senior, and a former deputy of General Noriega - the Dictator of Panama."

[link to www.clubconspiracy.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 499484


bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 09:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Can someone get me to a site that I can order the book?

It seems like it has been pulled already...!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 933520
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 09:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
I can't see any new york planning department allowing the use of nukes let alone three within a city the size of NY this just seems ludicrous.
He also claimed that the usa didn't know about the attacks but in the next breath claims they edited the live footage to cover it up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 09:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Another odd thing is the supposed placement of the nukes underground shows the Marriot hotel in the line of destruction...so that would have caused it to fall at the same time as one of the towers...did it fall then?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 09:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Another odd thing is the supposed placement of the nukes underground shows the Marriot hotel in the line of destruction...so that would have caused it to fall at the same time as one of the towers...did it fall then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 203360


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Actually, it was the WTC 4 to the right and Marriott to the left in most photos...AND
BOTH WERE DESTROYED when the tower fell, so this is consistent with Dimitri's story.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 788030
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Watch how the external column is polvarised @ 50 sec mark in this vid

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Another odd thing is the supposed placement of the nukes underground shows the Marriot hotel in the line of destruction...so that would have caused it to fall at the same time as one of the towers...did it fall then?


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Actually, it was the WTC 4 to the right and Marriott to the left in most photos...AND
BOTH WERE DESTROYED when the tower fell, so this is consistent with Dimitri's story.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 203360


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

This image of WTC 4 IS consistent with the radius of the nuke below WTC 2.

I would like to see video and watch only WTC-4 in action as WTC 2 falls.

News