Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,881 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,122,344
Pageviews Today: 3,000,964Threads Today: 702Posts Today: 12,722
07:35 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 10:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Another odd thing is the supposed placement of the nukes underground shows the Marriot hotel in the line of destruction...so that would have caused it to fall at the same time as one of the towers...did it fall then?


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Actually, it was the WTC 4 to the right and Marriott to the left in most photos...AND
BOTH WERE DESTROYED when the tower fell, so this is consistent with Dimitri's story.


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

This image of WTC 4 IS consistent with the radius of the nuke below WTC 2.

I would like to see video and watch only WTC-4 in action as WTC 2 falls.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 203360


Dimitri has one nuke in between WTC 2 and WTC 4 and I believe the image I linked of 4 shows the radius is consistent with the damage shown. In his video he also highlights the consistency of the damage caused by the nuke under WTC 7 with respect to the building near it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 928875
Canada
04/05/2010 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Michael Harari
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Michael "Mike" Harari (born 1927) was an Israeli intelligence officer in the Mossad. Harari was involved in several notable operations, including the failed Lillehammer affair and the rescue of hostages at Entebbe.

Harari began his intelligence work facilitating illegal Jewish immigration to Israel after World War II. He then spent time in the army and Shin Bet before being recruited by the Mossad in the 1960s. During his time in the Mossad he ran agents in Europe, eventually advancing to the head of the Operations Branch. It was during this time that he helped build and lead teams in Operation Wrath of God, the Israeli response to the Munich Massacre in 1972. In what became known as the Lillehammer affair, Harari led a team into Norway where they believed Ali Hassan Salameh, the chief of Black September operations was living. After identifying and assassinating the target, it was revealed that they had killed an innocent waiter, Ahmed Bouchiki, who only resembled Salameh. While authorities arrested many of Harari's team, he escaped back to Israel. A Norwegian case against him was dismissed in January 1999 because of a lack of evidence.[1]

Despite this setback, Harari later scored two major successes for the Mossad. Before Operation Thunderbolt was launched in July, 1976, to free Israeli hostages at Entebbe International Airport, Harari supposedly took the disguise of an Italian businessman to enter and reconnoiter the airport. He also helped facilitate the use of Kenyan air bases to refuel Israeli planes returning from the rescue mission.[2] In January, 1979, Harari led a team that killed Ali Hassan Salameh in Beirut with a car bomb, the same man he had tried to assassinate in Lillehammer years earlier.

At some later point in time Harari became the Mossad station chief in Latin America based out of Israel. Although he is said to have retired after this service, it is unclear if all his Israeli intelligence connections were severed when he left for Panama, He returned to Israel just before or during the 1989 United States invasion of Panama, which deposed Noriega and installed the legitimate presidential victor Guillermo Endara. Harari later appeared on Israeli television and denied that he was ever a close advisor of Noriega, and that he had escaped by his own means. [3]

Harari was played by actor Moshe Ivgy in Steven Spielberg's 2005 film Munich,[4] which depicts a controversial account of Operation Wrath of God.
[edit] Notes
anon 3759843
User ID: 47124
United States
04/05/2010 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
The metal tower turning to powder is called " dustification " or " dustify " on Dr. Judy Wood's site.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 499484
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 10:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
The metal tower turning to powder is called " dustification " or " dustify " on Dr. Judy Wood's site.
 Quoting: anon 3759843 47124


IMO J. Wood has been put out in order to discredit the nuke hypothesis.. as soon as anyone mentions it now, someone straight away mentions "lazer beams from space" in a comparison to ridicule it.

I wouldn't be suprised if some aspect of the technology exists, but she has ZERO evidence for it.. it is pure speculation. Where as the nuke hypothesis has alot more going for it, ALOT more.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 933520
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
All the things he said about kursk seems dodgy as well. I don't think the russians would just abandon it so someone could sail in and steal the missiles . It would have been well protected the whole time it was on the bottom.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
I also don't agree on the "US gov mostly innocent.." thing, but he may be trying to save his hide a bit on that...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 751533
United States
04/05/2010 10:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
So according to Dimitri, in order to build the WTC and Sears towers, nukes had to be placed under the buildings in order to bring them down if the case ever arose....

So how does that work? Does the general contractor go to Uncle Sam and say:

"Can we have a few 150 kiloton nukes?"
"Why?"
"Oh...we need to build these big towers and the city won't allow us unless we have nukes to bring them down buried underneath."
"Ok, that makes sense...sure. That'll be 4 million dollars."
"Do you take credit cards?"

This alone is bullshit. And then when he talks about the fear that nuclear devices were in the planes that crashed into the towers and neatly deposited atop the towers to be later set off as air bursts. And then saying that a nuclear tipped missile was used at the Pentagon but for some reason the nuke didn't go off....I'm sure there's more but I quit watching after about #20.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 499484
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 10:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
So according to Dimitri, in order to build the WTC and Sears towers, nukes had to be placed under the buildings in order to bring them down if the case ever arose....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 751533


No thats not what he said. The nukes were not pre-planted during construction, but planted on the day when they were called for. They were maintained under WTC 7, from where they were transported.

If you or anyone else has a better idea of how they intended to demolish these structures when the time arose, i'd like to hear it!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 934987
United States
04/05/2010 11:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
All the things he said about kursk seems dodgy as well. I don't think the russians would just abandon it so someone could sail in and steal the missiles . It would have been well protected the whole time it was on the bottom.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 933520



maybe the missiles are taken before the sinking of the kursk
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 933520
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 11:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
All the things he said about kursk seems dodgy as well. I don't think the russians would just abandon it so someone could sail in and steal the missiles . It would have been well protected the whole time it was on the bottom.


maybe the missiles are taken before the sinking of the kursk
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 934987



no terrorist group could have achieved this though, only a foreign government , and would you risk being caught stealing off the russians . don't think so.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 711379
United States
04/05/2010 11:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
More proof that the the nano-thermite/prewired explosives
no planes/holograms was all Bullshit!!

Thanks Dimitri!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 711379
United States
04/05/2010 11:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
More proof that the the nano-thermite/prewired explosives
no planes/holograms was all Bullshit!!

Thanks Dimitri!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 711379


Also Completely discredits the whole controled demolition
theory..

And shoots bldg 7 out of the water!!
WAS THE UNITED NATIONS BUILDIN
User ID: 935004
Thailand
04/05/2010 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Hello to everyone. I accidentally discovered a new thread dealing with the same issue. This time they are talking about the U.N. Building. Hope you find it interesting: [link to www.Gas_oven.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 933520
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 11:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
More proof that the the nano-thermite/prewired explosives
no planes/holograms was all Bullshit!!

Thanks Dimitri!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 711379



you don't think it would be fairly simple to check if 450 kilotons of nukes had gone off in downtown manhattan ?

wasn't nano thermite found in the dust ?

you figure it out !!
Was Tne UN Building built with
User ID: 935004
Thailand
04/05/2010 11:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Correction to the previous post. Here is the link:

Gas_oven.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=170354

[link to www.Gas_oven.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 711379
United States
04/05/2010 12:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
More proof that the the nano-thermite/prewired explosives
no planes/holograms was all Bullshit!!

Thanks Dimitri!!



you don't think it would be fairly simple to check if 450 kilotons of nukes had gone off in downtown manhattan ?

wasn't nano thermite found in the dust ?

you figure it out !!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 933520


Well which is it??..Nano thermite or a Nuke??

There's certainly no need for both..

One of these theories is Bullshit..
UN Building nuclear demolition
User ID: 935004
Thailand
04/05/2010 12:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
I really don't know why it is not possible to post the correct link here (it automatically changes to something else upon posting), so I post for you the entire reference material, instead (this is from Gas_oven - thread named cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=170354):

The Gas_oven Reading Room

WAS THE UNITED NATIONS BUILDING BUILT WITH A NUCLEAR BOMB IN ITS FOUNDATION?

Posted By: Rayelan <Send E-Mail>
Date: Saturday, 3-Apr-2010 21:02:51 The following arrived from a friend:

Rayelan, do you remember years ago you mentioned that Gunther told you that a nuclear device was planted underneath the United Nations for its eventual demolition. That it was built into the structure.

Listen to this Russian guy, because he corroborates what Gunther told you, but in a different way. He says large structures like the World Trade Center, that the builders knew how to build them, but not how to take them down. So it became standard policy agreed with a demolition company in the U.S. to construct into the foundation of these large buildings nuclear devices which would be triggered to demolition these large buildings at a future date. So you can bet the lavish buildings being built in Dubai have nuclear devices built into their foundation.

The youtube video is here:
[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 01:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
So according to Dimitri, in order to build the WTC and Sears towers, nukes had to be placed under the buildings in order to bring them down if the case ever arose....


No thats not what he said. The nukes were not pre-planted during construction, but planted on the day when they were called for. They were maintained under WTC 7, from where they were transported.

If you or anyone else has a better idea of how they intended to demolish these structures when the time arose, i'd like to hear it!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 499484



This is true....he said they had tunnels from 7, 1 and 2, to move these in when needed...so they need not be placed ahead of time, only the space had been left dedicated for the occassion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 01:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Correction to the previous post. Here is the link:

Gas_oven.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=170354

[link to www.Gas_oven.com]
 Quoting: Was Tne UN Building built with 935004



Doesn't work...how do you get there?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 711379
United States
04/05/2010 01:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Can you imagine if a Nuclear bomb went off UNDER the
world trade center??

Just imagine an m80 under a trash can lid x 1 million..

The whole theory is impossible!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 01:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Can you imagine if a Nuclear bomb went off UNDER the
world trade center??

Just imagine an m80 under a trash can lid x 1 million..

The whole theory is impossible!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 711379


You didn't watch the video, he explains the energy transfer that occurs with a deeply planted nuke, it's totally different from an above ground nuke.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 01:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
[link to cbs4denver.com]

Here's an example of what Dimitri was talking about. In the 60's nuking underground was considered a way to get things done efficiently.

In the article above they used a nuke to free up natural gas, but then later decided it was too radioactive to sell.

This was about the time people became aware of the dangers of exposure to rads and such alpha, beta, etc.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 01:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
"The DOE prohibits drilling within 40 acres of the area near Project Rulison, where a nuclear weapon was detonated 8,426 feet below the surface in 1969 to free up natural gas.

The gas was considered too radioactive to sell."
Nuclear demolition UN Building
User ID: 935004
Thailand
04/05/2010 01:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Correction to the previous post. Here is the link:

Gas_oven.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=170354

[link to www.Gas_oven.com]



Doesn't work...how do you get there?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 203360


I don't know why this site changes automatically links to something else upon posting. OK, now I post here the direct link to the info about nuclear demolition scheme of the UN Building, with spaces inserted after each usable character. You have to remove spaces to create the actual link. Hope it will work now. Here is the link:

w w w . Gas_oven . c o m / c g i - b i n / f o r u m . c g i ? r e a d = 1 7 0 3 5 4
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 933520
United Kingdom
04/05/2010 01:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
HE'S SELLING A BOOK WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED TO KNOW.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 01:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
You cannot deny also that when the FBI showed up at Ground Zero, they were in full hazmat gear in the midst of other workers who were appalled standing there with just basic dust masks....
correction to previous post
User ID: 935004
Thailand
04/05/2010 01:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
It does not work again - it automatically changes the words Gas_oven to "Gaz something". OK, now you can try this. The first part of this "prohibited" word is 'rumor', the second part (without space in between the two words) is 'mill', the third part (again without space in between the words) is 'news' after that it is as usual '.com' and then '/' and actual thread as mentioned above twice. But I repeat it here once again: / c g i - b i n / f o r u m . c g i ? r e a d = 1 7 0 3 5 4 (but you have to remove spaces here). Hope this time it will really work.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 935121
Canada
04/05/2010 02:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
The 9/11 truth movement is gaining too much traction.
Let's muddy the waters with as many alternate theories as possible.
Divide and conquer the truth seekers.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 935121
Canada
04/05/2010 02:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
Memo from Dick Cheney:

Okay, nobody believes it was a bunch of Arabs with box cutters, but can't we at least get in on this truth movement thing and propose a plausible theory that exhonerates us.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 203360
United States
04/05/2010 02:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****
FORMER SOVIET NUCLEAR INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ON 911: WTC 1,2&3 WERE POOLED BY NUCLEAR DEVICES EMBEDDED DURING CONSTRUCTION

Posted By: IZAKOVIC
Date: Sunday, 4-Apr-2010 07:07:07

In Response To: WAS THE UNITED NATIONS BUILDING BUILT WITH A NUCLEAR BOMB IN ITS FOUNDATION? (Rayelan) This is the most important explanation of technical aspects of the 911 attack on NY WTC towers, in which Dimitri Khalezov, former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, explains:

-that WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 had pre-installed nuclear demolition devices 50 meters beneath their fundaments



which were placed there during construction because US building code requires that all tall buildings must have a demolition procedure established to get construction permit.



-that the NORAD found that the PENTAGON was under attack by Soviet Granit cruise nuclear missile



before it struck and then it did not explode. This is why USAF Doomsday Plane was circling over White House and why PENTAGON was evacuated in panic.

-that attack on PENTAGON made possibility that airplanes that struck the WTC 1 and 2 had Russian Granit missile nuclear warheads on board real.

-that government made decision to activate nuclear demolition devices under the WTC 1 and 2 to minimise the damage in the case the airplanes that hit WTC 1 and 2 HAD Russian warheads onboard. This is because their explosion few hundred meters above ground would destroy entire New York, killing everybody, while activation of nuclear demolition devices embedded under WTC 1 and 2 would only kill those in their vicinity.

-that Building 7 was pooled down by it's nuclear demolition device to cover the existence of such devices in USA which made USA open to terrorist nuclear attack without the need that terrorist import their own nukes.

-that Chicago Sears Tower has the nuclear device installed beneath its fundaments for the same purpose, and that is why Sears Towers were evacuated during the 911 attack

-that over 90% of the content of his book was verified by the FBI after the first edition, and that, for second edition he made some changes in remaining 10 percent following their advice

Rayelan is right, UN has a similar pool-down device installed.

This is probably the most important book (and video series) one can read in this period, possibly remaining period, of it's life, and it should be used to start the legal procedure against perpetrators of 911 before they transfer elsewhere.

----

911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 01 of 26

March 11, 2010 — 9/11 WTC nuclear demolition & the Soviet missile in the Pentagon. Dimitri Khalezov, a former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence, explains true mechanics of pulverisations of the Twin Towers & the WTC-7, as well as existence of a secret nuclear demolition scheme of the World Trade Center in New York & of the Sears Tower in Chicago. Practically no question is left of the 9/11 mystery. For more details visit [link to www.nuclear-demolition.com]

News