9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE ***** | |
| really1 User ID: 1076086 04/27/2011 09:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | out of [link to de.wikipedia.org] "Gefahren Nanothermit ist ein Gefahrstoff, da seine Reaktion extrem hohe Temperaturen verursacht und zudem eine einmal eingeleitete Reaktion kaum zu stoppen ist. Zudem spielt bei Nanothermit die Zusammensetzung und Formgebung der Substanz eine entscheidende Rolle, da diese die Verbrennungseigenschaften maßgeblich beeinflussen.[5] Bei einer Thermitreaktion wird intensiv Licht im sichtbaren und unsichtbaren Spektrum (Ultraviolettstrahlung) emittiert, so dass ohne Schutzvorkehrungen Erblindungsgefahr und Verbrennungen der Haut drohen." It does mean, that if it explodes, there are two types of light:shiny white and ultraviolette, which is nonvisible! The consequence of it: you can get blind. So, how many survivors are blind? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1353783 04/28/2011 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1171703 04/30/2011 06:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1313900 05/02/2011 01:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Able Danger User ID: 1250846 05/02/2011 02:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At least they're bringing the Saudi royal's body to the U.S. to give him proper Christian burial, I guess. Unless Hussein Obamba wants to foist Osama's head on a pole as a trophy and display it on the side of the Washington Beltway? Strictly to build morale, of course. More likely Osama's been dead for a decade or longer... or he could be still alive and living under an assumed name in Texas? It's really hard to believe this multi-millionaire Saudi has been living in a cave in Pakistan, supposedly since before 9/11, especially since he needs regular kidney dialysis treatment...according to the U.S. media. This whole story stinks, I wouldn't believe a word of it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 750641 05/02/2011 07:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1188391 05/02/2011 08:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ‎10 year anniversary of September 11th coming up, the propaganda machine will move on to it's next scaremongering program? North Korea maybe!?! x Also your probably start hearing a lot of subliminal references which relate to September 11th(which we have been since the start of the year) like "plane problems" "Osama Bin-Laden drugged Libyan youths to revolt" <--- That one did make me laugh, "Muslim uprisings", "The Qu'ran burning red neck actors", "more plane problems", "new footage of September 11th(already happened a month back", "The so called Terror Meter" "More Al-Qaeda shizzle brizzle bla rat at tat tat" "plane crashes". Time for big finale!?! |
| 911thology User ID: 1368347 05/03/2011 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi to everyone! I am very sorry for being absent for such a long time here. Was very busy with some other stuff and had no time for the Internet. Using this opportunity, let me congratulate everyone with the convenient "killing" of our arch-enemy - the CIA agent Osama bin Laden (who was NOT officially wanted by the FBI for the perpetrating of 9/11, by the way), as well as with the convenient "burying" of "his" body in the nearest (only 2.000 km away from the land-locked Afghanistan as well as from Northern Pakistan) sea. A nice analysis of Osama bin Lande's picture could be found here: [link to DON'T_USE-THIS] ------------------------------------------------------- Another important notice. If anyone used a Cipher Wall Client program to communicate with me in an encrypted manner, be informed that the Cipher Wall central server has changed its IP address. Now it is: 91.200.234.174 If you have old version of the Cipher Wall Client program, please, go into Settings and change the former IP-address of the sever (in the Server Host field) to the new one - the digits shown above. Sincerely yours, Dimitri Khalezov. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1188391 05/03/2011 03:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1368604 05/03/2011 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi to everyone! I am very sorry for being absent for such a long time here. Was very busy with some other stuff and had no time for the Internet. Using this opportunity, let me congratulate everyone with the convenient "killing" of our arch-enemy - the CIA agent Osama bin Laden (who was NOT officially wanted by the FBI for the perpetrating of 9/11, by the way), as well as with the convenient "burying" of "his" body in the nearest (only 2.000 km away from the land-locked Afghanistan as well as from Northern Pakistan) sea. A nice analysis of Osama bin Lande's picture could be found here: [link to DON'T_USE-THIS] ------------------------------------------------------- Hello Dimitri: the link doesnt work |
| Danko User ID: 1369777 05/04/2011 12:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BIN LADEN DIED IN 2001 [link to www.globalresearch.ca] |
| really1 User ID: 1076086 05/04/2011 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Easy to find it, if you are not silly: you take the words "analysis of Osama bin Lande's picture" and go to google search. Then there open some links: for exemple this one: [link to www.oberonreview.com.au] To the picture there, you cannot see well: [link to www.fbi.gov] quotation: "Bin Laden is the leader of a terrorist organization known as Al-Qaeda, "The Base". He is left-handed and walks with a cane." especially this: "He is left-handed and walks with a cane." I am very amazed. I did never seen the cane?! Did you? And here is some interesting thread from Southern Pradise: [link to forums.appleinsider.com] And there are some mysterious video clips on youtube, about Obama/Osama - for example, about some commons between them. I took only one now: [link to wiki.answers.com] So, it is so strange and difficult, to realize, that the media can make fun to so many peoples, but as you can see, it is possible in every direction! It is up to you, how you decide! |
| really1 User ID: 1076086 05/04/2011 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last year, I did even compare the hands of Obama/ Osama, by photos, it was difficult, but I did find some, where you can see the inside of the same hand - it was the SAME HAND! But I am not stupid, am I, to believe, what I see!? Prove it by yourself, and bounce me and trounce me after this! Thank you! |
| really1 User ID: 1076086 05/04/2011 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1353783 05/04/2011 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Interceptor 1982 User ID: 1371636 05/05/2011 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Alan Reiss" Director of the World Trade Center is talking about the WTC bombing in 1993. quote: "I was about 150 feet from ground zero." Interview was taken on January 25th 2001 and was shown in the documentary "Modern Marvels: World Trade Center" The part about the bombing begins at 7:41. At 8:24 he is saying "ground zero". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1353783 05/05/2011 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1372853 05/06/2011 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| really1 User ID: 1140757 05/07/2011 05:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Alan Reiss" Director of the World Trade Center is talking about the WTC bombing in 1993. Quoting: Interceptor 1982quote: "I was about 150 feet from ground zero." Interview was taken on January 25th 2001 and was shown in the documentary "Modern Marvels: World Trade Center" The part about the bombing begins at 7:41. At 8:24 he is saying "ground zero". What do you want to say by this???? |
| Interceptor 1982 User ID: 1373751 05/07/2011 07:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @ really1: From Dimitris Book: The first mini-nuclear bombing of the WTC also known as the 1993 WTC “car-bombing”. First of all we have to establish whether the 1993 WTC bombing was yet another typical “mini-nuclear” bombing as the most of so-called “car-bombings” and “truck-bombings” were, or it was a conventional one? Of course, it was a nuclear bombing, and though it is difficult to prove it today, you will see a proof of this fact...... Last Edited by Interceptor 1982 on 05/07/2011 07:38 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 973795 05/07/2011 07:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So.....it wasn't enough to have so much supernamo thermate plastered all over the place that over 10 TONS of the stuff was left uncombusted in the rubble. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 933098It wasn't enough to have demolition charges wired to every girder on every floor so that the buildings fell at freefall speeds. It wasn't enough to have a disintegrator beam turn it into a pile of dust! No! - they needed to make quadrupley sure that the worlds media could film a demolition so blatantly obvious that every armchair whacko could spot it as soon as they saw a single grainy video - they had to blow the thing up with a nuclear fucking bomb! And you wonder why the world is laughing at you!? I agree... If they can't eliminate the truth, they need to bury it in a bunch of laughable theories that would make even the most nutty tin-foil-hat type laugh. I'll stick with the video, audio, pictures and chemical tests as my evidence... Pfffttt...Nuclear attack? This "burying the truth in B.S." Tactic OP and many other's like to use is so transparent I can't beileve this post has more than one star. |
| really1 User ID: 1140757 05/07/2011 08:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @ really1: Quoting: Interceptor 1982From Dimitris Book: The first mini-nuclear bombing of the WTC also known as the 1993 WTC “car-bombing”. First of all we have to establish whether the 1993 WTC bombing was yet another typical “mini-nuclear” bombing as the most of so-called “car-bombings” and “truck-bombings” were, or it was a conventional one? Of course, it was a nuclear bombing, and though it is difficult to prove it today, you will see a proof of this fact...... Would you please continue this sentence? I asked myself, while looking at that video, where are the people/victims with some indices of hanging skin or such things....?! And the radiation detectors, were they used? Something about that in Dimitris book?! Thank you! |
| Interceptor 1982 User ID: 1373751 05/07/2011 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Would you please continue this sentence? I asked myself, while looking at that video, where are the people/victims with some indices of hanging skin or such things....?! And the radiation detectors, were they used? Something about that in Dimitris book?! Thank you! Quoting: really1 The sentence was already finished. I can't put more in here from Dimitris book, because it would be unfair. Why should the officials show people with hanging skin or battered bodies which will disturb the viewer. You can't also find any terrible images from 9/11, except those jumpers flying through the air and some blood on survivors which you have seen on TV. That's all school TV for sissies. And I couldn't find anything about radiation detectors in his book. You must know that there is not enough information available to find hard evidence. People who are living in the US could maybe find some interesting information in old newspapers, but not in the internet. What can I do is to show you an old article from 1993: [link to www.nytimes.com] If you can read between the lines, you would understand that only a nuclear explosion could happen there. Here are some excerpts from this article: The effects of the blast radiated outward, disrupting most non-cable television transmissions throughout the metropolitan area, halting traffic in most of lower Manhattan and PATH train service under the Hudson River from the trade center to New Jersey, and transforming an ordinary Friday in the financial district into an afternoon of turmoil, death and destruction. …The blast, which erupted at 12:18 P.M on the second level of a four-story underground parking garage beneath the trade center's 110-story twin towers and the complex's Vista Hotel, sent cars hurtling like toys, blew out a 100-foot wall and sent the floor collapsing down several stories, creating a crater 60 feet wide that reached deep into the bowels of the parking complex… 'We crawled under pipes when we arrived and everything was on fire,' said Edward Bergen, a 38-year-old firefighter who was one of the first to reach the scene of the blast. 'Suddenly, a guy came walking out of the flames, like one of those zombies in the movie, 'The Night of the Living Dead.' His flesh was hanging off. He was a middle-aged man.' And why should Alan Reiss say that he was about 150 feet from "ground zero". It's the same as he is saying: "I was about 150 feet from a nuclear explosion." Last Edited by Interceptor 1982 on 05/07/2011 12:53 PM |
| really1 User ID: 1140757 05/07/2011 03:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1370312 05/07/2011 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Hacko User ID: 1376889 05/09/2011 06:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | what did Dimtiri specialize in while he was in Russia? does someone have his resume' or can you post it yourself Dimitri? im tryin to tell people about your theory but they want to know about you. Thanks in advance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1370312As I remember Dimitri was a petty officer that time at a special section of the soviet nuclear forces. Responsible for information coming in. You'll find out in the video, I would have to look it up to give you the exact title. So, Dimitri, don't you think we' ll have the next 9/11 within the next 12 month's after that pulling of the "Bin Laden" card? One week before "Bin Laden kill" CIA-wikileaks "leaked" there will be a nuclear terror attack if "Bin Laden gets cought or killed". We are back to the alleged up to 40 nuclear warheads missing after the downfall of the Soviet union, "now in the hands of terrorists". What's your take? The situatiuon in the middle east, the world economic situation, everything points to a next 9/11, this time atmospheric nuclear??? Maybe just a dirty bomb, who knows.... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1377096 05/09/2011 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | what did Dimtiri specialize in while he was in Russia? does someone have his resume' or can you post it yourself Dimitri? im tryin to tell people about your theory but they want to know about you. Thanks in advance Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1370312As I remember Dimitri was a petty officer that time at a special section of the soviet nuclear forces. Responsible for information coming in. You'll find out in the video, I would have to look it up to give you the exact title. So, Dimitri, don't you think we' ll have the next 9/11 within the next 12 month's after that pulling of the "Bin Laden" card? One week before "Bin Laden kill" CIA-wikileaks "leaked" there will be a nuclear terror attack if "Bin Laden gets cought or killed". We are back to the alleged up to 40 nuclear warheads missing after the downfall of the Soviet union, "now in the hands of terrorists". What's your take? The situatiuon in the middle east, the world economic situation, everything points to a next 9/11, this time atmospheric nuclear??? Maybe just a dirty bomb, who knows.... |
| really1 User ID: 1076086 05/10/2011 02:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi Hacko! As I think, because I did read it somewhere, all these nuclear weapons are unable to explode. Do not panic, I would say. If it is true, that these old arsenals are too old to work - though they told us all these years of the cold war,that it could work! - we can keep cool. |
| Hacko User ID: 1377343 05/10/2011 03:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi Hacko! Quoting: really1 1076086As I think, because I did read it somewhere, all these nuclear weapons are unable to explode. Do not panic, I would say. If it is true, that these old arsenals are too old to work - though they told us all these years of the cold war,that it could work! - we can keep cool. [youtube] dear really1, the problem is, if the PTB need something really dramatic they can pull it. Like 9/11. The old nukes stolen in past-Soviet Russia is just the story for the sheeple. They can place a completely newone under the Eifel tower, ignite it and say this was "al Quaida". They just do it, if they feel they need to. That's the problem. |
| really1 User ID: 1076086 05/10/2011 04:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I do not think, that they could tell such thing, after pulling the Eiffel tower. I think, that the French people and also the French government would not be happy about this action. So, and I even do not think, that it would be possible these days, that everybody would simply believe it, though told so, because there are many critical statements on everything nowerdays. I think, it would be nonsence to do these "acts"..... but what does the Illuminati card-games tell?! Is there something on a picture? A little Micky Mouse battle? |