9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

Khavilov has been set up to destroy no plane theory, and tv fakery.
His information is a turd in the informational super highway please go to this link for better understanding.

[link to z6.invisionfree.com]

I am finally open to the idea that 911 was not totally an inside job, at least not from the perspective that we planned it. Recently, I am of the opinion that Israel started these events in motion.

I think it goes beyond Israel.. there were evidently key players in MOSSAD, the CIA, maybe the FSB and others.. now who on Earth has the capability to co-ordinate an operation spanning several intelligence agencies? How about the people who created the CIA and MOSSAD, linked to MI6, and then onto Rome, the centre of intelligence, money and power..

Knights of Malta. Enough said.

Khavilov has been set up to destroy no plane theory, and tv fakery.
His information is a turd in the informational super highway please go to this link for better understanding.

[link to z6.invisionfree.com]


"It looks like DIMITRI is a digital creation - or something of that sort.
There are way too many glitches in his interview videos to make me believe otherwise." - Simon Shack


Wow.. talk about jumping to absolutely batshit paranoid conclusions! A digital creation.. are you fucking serious? A few frame glitches = a digital human creation?

I thought Simon Shack had some good stuff, but after reading that.. wow.

Yes I would imagine your are right. But back to my question. How can we win this game? My thought is that we stop playing it because no one will win.

I think natural events will take our focus away from this war game but it feels like a baseball game with the score tied in the bottom of the ninth.

Anyone.....video #12??????

i personally thought they were editing glitches, simon has called out quite a few instances of "Dipers" digital persons.
They were used to some extent on the 9/11 interviews from the streets on the day of the attack, you can see that they had rendering problems, arms missing, transparency problems, rendering glitches go to septemberclues.com to see more.

Fascinating! Simply fascinating. Makes perfect sense and I am only up to 12 of 26!
What happened to part 12? Can't find it anywhere. Did he reveal something that was deemed too controversial (not that his entire presentation isn't).

This gentleman certainly sounds like he knows what he is stating.


Anyone.....video #12??????

Fascinating! Simply fascinating. Makes perfect sense and I am only up to 12 of 26!
What happened to part 12? Can't find it anywhere. Did he reveal something that was deemed too controversial (not that his entire presentation isn't).

This gentleman certainly sounds like he knows what he is stating.


Anyone.....video #12??????

Here is part 12

Nothing more than misdirection. The question is why?

Is it this individual trying to earn a buck or is this yet another misdirection injection by the TPTB to muddy the water even more?

"Yes I would imagine your are right. But back to my question. How can we win this game? My thought is that we stop playing it because no one will win."

I think natural events will take our focus away from this war game but it feels like a baseball game with the score tied in the bottom of the ninth.


It's not about winning the game, because the game we're playing is not political, it is spiritual (stick with me on this.. im not christian btw).

There are 2 (im sure there are more) referrences to 9/11 before it happened embedded in the human mind. The first im sure everyone has seen, the Simpsons NY episode with Lisa holding the travel guide with $9 price and the twin towers making the 11. The second is a painting by Alex Gray done years before 9/11 showing 2 planes, the twin towers and Bush.

[link to www.cremationofcare.com]

[link to 4.bp.blogspot.com]

The 2nd plane is slightly hidden behind the red wireframe lines.

===


There is no need to "win" because we are already winning! 9/11 has resulted in thousands, if not millions of people accelerating their own level of awareness/consciousness.

Gotta take a break. Just spent 2 hours watching 15 videos.

Question: If the Pentagon missile was a Russian nuclear warhead missile (very plausible) then, who fired it from the Atlantic Ocean?
Is he suggesting it was Russia who fired it? or Al Qaeda/Osama bought it from Russia? or USA made a deal with Russia?
I am confused on this part.
I'll finish watching this later. Not sure if it'll be over a huge cup of coffee and larger glass of alcohol though (smile)

Thanks~

this should be pinned

Gotta take a break. Just spent 2 hours watching 15 videos.

Question: If the Pentagon missile was a Russian nuclear warhead missile (very plausible) then, who fired it from the Atlantic Ocean?
Is he suggesting it was Russia who fired it? or Al Qaeda/Osama bought it from Russia? or USA made a deal with Russia?
I am confused on this part.
I'll finish watching this later. Not sure if it'll be over a huge cup of coffee and larger glass of alcohol though (smile)

Thanks~

Thanks. I don't want to name here the one who did it, for even though I didn't name anyone yet, by now I am already marked on some chauvinistic web site as 'potentially harmful to Jews and/or Israel'. Regarding 'no-planes' argument - I know that this issue is very sensitive because it allegedly 'divides 9/11 truthers'. However I don't care about them.

You know exactly that his claims will seem even more unbelievable than the "normal" demolition theory. You know exactly that there will never be a new investigation with people running around screaming "nuke, no planes, spacebeam weapons" ... these claims are the perfect way piss off people who would have the power to support a new investigation (they will just think you're nuts and therefore they will think if one of them is nuts then all those 911 truth people are nuts, this is just the way 99.9% of the population think "if one of a group is nuts all must be").

The fact is that controlled demolition, no matter by what means is NOT the issue that will bring a new investigation ... it might come up during an investigation, but it will NEVER be the reason that there will be one. To the contrary.

To bring up a new investigation you need to follow stuff like the put option/wallstreet issue, norad standdown, connections of the alleged hijakers to three letter agencys, silversteins insurance racket etc, etc ... you know, stuff that is not from out of this world and which might be picked up by a decent attorney to file a lawsuit. No lawyer on this planet will make himself look like a conplete tard by bringing up a lawsuit that claims N's were used to bring down the towers, even if this were true. Lawyers like to file lawsuits that can be won, not something that will make them look like fools and destroy the rest of their career.

As long as you dig in the wrong hole (controlled demolition, no matter by what means) there will never be a new investigation ... and as long as there is no new investigation nothing will change.
Or do you retards HONESTLY think someone will listen to a loon running around "nuke, space beam, hologram planes" ?

The way the buildings were brought down is COMPLETELY irrelevant and discussion about it does hurt the now already long dead "truth movement". You have done a fine job retards, your stupid theorys about what brought down the towers already has destroyed the small flower of truth that rose after 911 ... good, job demolitards, good job.

Anyways, I'm not an even American, I couldn't care less about you hillbilly space-beam-no-plane-trufers.

When it comes to the destruction method of the WTC, this really settles it for me. I was already more or less convinced that nuclear devices must have been used, based only on how the steel structure is pulverized into micron size dust. But this presentation really puts all pieces together. Then about the missing warheads and all that, I can't really tell.

WHO HERE was actually in NEW YORK and SAW a plane hit the world trade center?

Fascinating! Simply fascinating. Makes perfect sense and I am only up to 12 of 26!
What happened to part 12? Can't find it anywhere. Did he reveal something that was deemed too controversial (not that his entire presentation isn't).

This gentleman certainly sounds like he knows what he is stating.


Anyone.....video #12??????