9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

i think he is allowed this for the purpose of giving TPTB an out. he takes the fedgov off the hook. thats the only part a definitely dont buy about his conclusions.

and this doesnt set off alrms in people? whats wrong with new yorkers????

when i was boy my first rock concert was alice cooper. later that night i signed the back of my ticket "alice cooper" and had plans to pass it off as real to my friends. it wasnt in me to do so. i have since met many people who have no interest in the truth, only their agenda. in this deluded country, you can find plenty of "eye witnesses", plane or no plane. doesnt mean a thing.

but yes, at the start, no eyewitnesses saw planes. only on video.

The problem is all US institutions are totally corrupted. Man can do many things but he can't change the laws of physics. That's why it is a good idea to adress the destruction of WTC because it is all about physics and mechanics. Hollow aluminium planes cannot fly through steel walls. Gravitation and fire cannot pulverize steel beams. It's very frustrating as I am an engineer to see how these lies have taken over the minds of most people and media, most of who don't have any knowledge or education in physics.

mo' bettah

AAAAARGH!!!

After video #26 he says his book NAMES the perpetrators of 911 and thats it!!

Who does he name?

I came across a forum post by him somewhere on my searches today where the mod was pestering him for a name and he gave one out. It was a chief or high level official from MOSSAD in Israel.

What was his name?

..More Stupid Bullshit


TruthTards...

[link to alethonews.wordpress.com]

Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co., part-owned by the Israeli government, moved their North American headquarters from the 16th floor of the WTC to Norfolk, Virginia one week before the 9/11 attacks, incurring a $50,000 fine for breaking its lease, according to the Jerusalem Post.

Despite being in the public domain, none of these relevant facts are mentioned in the 9/11 Commission’s 567-page report.

My brother, who worked in one of the adjoining buildings (not in the complex itself but near Verizon) said HE SAW the second plane coming in. He said he saw it from his office window.

I've questioned him time after time after time and he does not budge from his position.

I know the poor guy had to walk home that day, to New Jersey (a long ass hike) full of debris and dust and in total disbelief and it's there that I wonder if he just fell victim to what the media was saying and spinning that entire day/evening (about the second plane).

I don't want to think my own brother was delusional nor does it bode well with me to think he's a bi-product of mass media brainwashing but.....he DID vote for Bush in 04. So......I just don't know what to think anymore.

I've been on 9-11 TruthMovement ever since 2002!

Do people like you (who already have a predisposition in your belief) just frequent threads like this to spew your shit?

I mean....I don't believe in religion so the last thing that would interest me is to read a religious thread.

So I don't get it.

Your time would be better spent on topics you believe in and our mission (regarding 9-11 truth) wouldn't have to encounter useless speed bumps like yourself if you weren't here.

Again, I don't get it! Can it be you just like Putin?

They still could have been attached to the planes.

Inever got to thepart about Pa. because he said he had explain the towers first. anyone know?

Maybe it was headed to Sears. Donald slipped up and said we took it down, but what about pattern on the ground. It was the same so says google in 2004, the same little pattrn.
where that little puff of smoke was.

Another interesting bit of possible prescience from 1973:


The Curve of Binding Energy: A Journey into the Awesome and Alarming World of Theodore B. Taylor

John McPhee, staff writer for the "New Yorker" and Pulitzer-Prize-winning author of twenty-seven books on subjects as various as oranges and the merchant marine, has written a nuclear explosion of a book in "The Curve of Binding Energy." It's one of those books that is even more relevant now than when it was written. Essentially, it's a blueprint of how to build a nuclear device using materials at hand, along with a chunk of rather easily stolen U-235 or plutonium. Theodore B. Taylor, himself the creator of smaller, more efficient nuclear bombs, tells us where to steal the plutonium, how to assemble a bomb, even gives hints on where to plant it--one of the eeriest parts of this book has Taylor and McPhee exploring the now-vanished towers of the World Trade Center, trying to pick the spot where a nuclear device could do the most damage. [link to www.amazon.com]



Kinda makes this rather hmmm-worthy:


9/11 Commissioner States Attacks Were Part Of 30 Year Old Conspiracy [link to www.redicecreations.com]

Ok. i am back from a nice motorcycle ride and I see not much has happened in this thread. WTF is wrong with GLP today? Is this not a major new piece of info worth discussing?

I don't know who the mods are but I am starting to wonder based on the stuff that gets pinned around here and the stuff that gets ignored. (apologies if this is pinned by the time I post this)

It makes total sense that they needed a plan to bring the buildings down before they could build them and those two towers could not be taken down using conventional methods. It also explains why building 7 went down how and when it did.

It also explains why the fires lasted so long.

But I am a little confused how they were able to hide the radiation. If it is true that they don't allow Geiger counters around there, if so, then we need to do more research on that right away.

The more I think about this, the more I am hesitant to assume the US government was a victim just trying to minimize the loss. Although, I am open to the idea that the US might be blackmailed and could not do anything.

Let's face it. There are a lot of missing nukes out there according to this guy.

This man on coast to coast the other night said nothing could ever be built there because of something.
He also said it came from navy whose navy? Now Dimitri said it was 300 miles out from sea.

Which makes me think that Dimitri is unveiling some truth (WTC destruction with nukes) to sell another lie (terrorists have access to those "stolen" Granite missiles or the warheads). Another false flag on the way?

I sorta agree. The way Dimetri is saying it is.....USA is a victim, kinda.

I think as far as designing these massive buildings, they needed to keep in mind (and provide the technology of) how to bring them down later on should the time or event, arise.

Back in the 60's, when erecting this complex, they probably had visions of lower Manhattan being highly populated as it clearly, was.
So if you apply the mind-set of: "everything that goes up, must come down" then, they might've just been planning for a degenerative/old-age sort demise/ending of these buildings in years to come.

So I can see why, part of the 'deal' back then was, 'if you build it then, you must have a device to bring it down when the time comes'.


And I can further see why this 'plan' wouldn't go over too well with the citizens (Clients). I mean, who would want to rent an office on-top of a nuclear device that "may" accidently (or purposefully) go off?

It's sneaky on NY's part but understandable (in a real sinister sorta way!).


(I am on part 16 and still trying to figure out this Russian missile thing) Whose submarine was it?

The radiation was/is contained. It wasn't airborne. It was underground. That's the way I am understanding it.

Totally agree. We know 911 was caused by terrorists, it's just that we don't all agree 'who' the terrorists are. Yes, I am worried this info could be coming out to get the nuke concept into our mindset. Another false flag is certainly possible given how people are starting to wake up, and, well, we wouldn't want that to happen now would we?

I did a little web searching for 'Geiger counter 911' and found this interesting article from 2007:

[link to www.atlanticfreepress.com]

He has a web site over at Let's Roll forum.

Doghead I think is what they call him.

I saw only dates from 2009, though.

the book is a high 56.00 book.

The way i understand it is that most of the radiation would have been contained, as it was not an airburst explosion. Radioactive gases from vapourized material would have leaked out over time (and indeed we saw this), which would fuck anyone who inhaled it.. which has happened, lots of 1st responders dying of cancer.. the radioactive solids contained in the pit were trucked away under tight security (GPS) and never seen again..

Part 21

The "live" red banner turned to a "live" BLUE banner via CNN when second plane 'hit' after fading to black!
Whoa! Excellent detective eye!!!!

People saw a plane. So the beginning was a bit incredible.

Perhaps...

But the info about the actual demolition is mind blowing!

Most people probably couldn't differentiate a plane and a missile that looked like one, especially under the shock they endured that day.

a plane would have bounced off the building. there is no way around it.

I agree withcha all!

Shock?
Missile/plane confusion?
Plane bouncing off opposed to being absorbed.


But here's my brother. 9 years ago. College educated. At the age of 42 back then. Working at Wall Street.

I just can't imagine why he thinks he saw a plane.

It's all so mind-boggling.

This interview is also mind-boggling. I never considered nuclear explosives underground!

All I can say is.....WOW!

Last Edited by SunDawnn on 04/04/2010 07:01 PM

WOW! Very interesting videos I just spent 2hrs plus listening to all 26 video's.


One point I may have missed is which world ,power had the ability to launch a stolen Russian Nuke from the Atlantic ocean?

You would need the technical know how, plus you would need a sea based platform to launch the Nuke. Most likely a submarine or a modified tanker. Either way Sat photos taken at the time in the Atlantic would have given a later visual I.D. of the sea platform.

Dimitri never says who might be the culprit in such an attack. AND why would they steal a Russian Nuke, Launch a Russian Nuke, and then not ARM a Russian Nuke?

As always the question is WHO benefited most from 9/11 happening.

The FACT is, the "planes" we saw on TV were fake.. that has been established. Now, what happened in the real world is a different story, and there are a few possibilities;

1) There was nothing except pre-planted explosives at the impact floors

2) Some kind of missile impacted the towers, large enough to be seen by observers, and in the confusion/brainwashing afterwards convinced people it was a plane

3) There were plane/s flying in the area, a "fly-by" was done to imprint the real image of a plane into peoples minds. Most would see the plane but not the actual moment of impact. TV fills in the rest.

4) Combination of 2 + 3


Personally, i go for number 1. Why? Because it has less risk (no physical evidence), and because i know just how easily people can be manipulated, programmed and brainwashed, ESPECIALLY with a highly charged emotional event, and ESPECIALLY when the media is involved. TV is THE most powerful psychological weapon EVER devised. Period. And of course peer pressure.. if everyone "saw" an impact and you didn't, would you stand up and say "hey, i didn't see that?". 99% of people wouldn't.. fear of ridicule, and lack of confidence in your own mental ability (especially when everyone else is telling you otherwise!).

He thinks the flights that were hijacked were probably shot down. If this is true, then we were in on it from the beginning. Dondt understand.