9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

I was just going to say that if anyone has access to anyone in the demolition business, please ask them how they would propose to take down a structure like WTC 1 and 2.

I think the statement that you can't put it up until we know how you propose to take it down makes a hell of a lot of sense.

What are you suggesting? Radiation still? Yeah....does seem rather non-opportunist for prime real estate/location.

He claims everything was turned to dust.
How come the windows didn't turn to dust?

I'm a New Yorker.
And I can tell you the Steel beams were not dustified.

They were bent and cut.

Good Lord it happened! I knew someday I would cross a post so mind blowingly retarded I would get an aneurysm.

Conspiracy nuts? WTF are you doing here

Nobody cares anymore? 2 wars and the forever changed geopolitical landscape. 3000 dead Americans. Over a million dead Iraqis. No One cares? WTF

this is the dumbest post EVER in the history of the Internet.

I prefer to think of us as inquisitive beings of light. And you my friend, are a moron if you think nobody cares anymore.

it is interesting, may be it was somehow masked by the simultaneous downfall into the 'egg'?
also doesn't the idea of windows blowing out come from atmospheric (i.e. 'inroom granade') explosions?

that is exactly the kind of things i have been looking for. thats why that cloud of dust looked so strange. ONLY a nuke could do this. these bastards nuked manhattan. i am beyond words.

They still don't look effected at all.
No color change, no crystalization effect.

No nothing.

It still looks like a typical demolition explosion sequence starting right under the impact point and working it's way down.

his opinion isnt proof. and anything from the fbi can be counted on to be a total fabrication.

i thought you WERE the russian guy. hi dimitri. :5:

not sure but the argument is probably goes as this - lets imagine there is a heavy lead on the top of WTF7 - the opposing upward crushing wave (in the 'dust brick' falling underneath the top undamaged stories falling a even bit faster due to air resistance) will produce similar muchroom effect on the top as it happened in the WTC1 and 2 cases. That might or not explain the visual effect of the 'upper explosions'. And vice versa - WTC1& WTC2 were not detectably changed from the
"upward solid matter wave" at least at the presented video resolutions and qualities - pretty much the same way as it happened with WTC7 - it's of course well known there - judging by the videos - it started morphing somehow with its infamous arch on the top etc but still more or less managed to keep it's usual appearance during the whole pull down into the egg (according to Dimitri).

Could someone link the path to this video?

The top stories were not dustified according to Dimitri, so this could be the "intact" steel.

what do the guys at ae911 have to say about this?

[link to 911research.wtc7.net]

Sub-level 5 blueprint plan WTC North Tower

The bottom girders were "cut".
As far as the total mass of the steel girders that remained intact, it's just theory.

Because Nazi Guliani had it shipped out to China and melted with days.

So this still remains as a theory.

Again, evidence of thermate has been peer reviewed.
I suggest you stick to real evidence.

[link to 911research.wtc7.net]

"Miscellaneous Mechanical Plans" are missing from the list, but listed on the Schedule of Drawings.

you got that right!

i dont necessarily 'buy' his explanations for WHY everything was done .. but this guys KNOWS HIS SH*T about underground thermonuclear explosions.

yes, his expertise really shines. his opinions and the fbi info, not so much.

both thermate and a nuke were used. this was a sophisticated operation. we were attacked from within and without simultaneously.

if there were no planes how were the holes produced? since they existed only for half an hour each maybe total TV fakery is more plausible?
maybe the TV-holes and the whole plane redherring idea was implemented by perpetrators as a form of proposed defense mechanism and was a part of the nuclear destruction security protocol for situations exactly like this?

so in essence the perpetrators demonstrated to the army that such danger exists and advised them on how to minimize the consequences - and then 'stroked' themselves of course

so again - the situation essentially was - the bank security consultant suddenly gets his hands on black-market military grade wall-piercing tech and decides to rob the bank he himself consulted - or even consults the bank crisis PR department already with wall-piercing device in mind and means of obtaining it
(not without a small number corrupted insiders of course)

if there are nuclear charges moving on speed train wagons all around NYC should such premade crisis management script exist?

let's not forget about this footage: [link to www.youtube.com]


it's still not quite clear afaik who and what the scriptwriters really were ( imdb Chris Carter, Vince Gilligan, John Shiban, and Frank Spotnitz) and whether they had any traceable connections to what happened

Vince Gilligan is the 'Breaking Bad' Vince Gilligan , wow, somebody may well have used such brilliant writer's ideas

To be honest with you, I don't follow that affair closely enough to have any confirmed info or to form any opinion of my own (I am too apolitical, I don't even possess any TV set and I rarely read newspapers now, especially after the 9/11 - since it killed in me the last remnants of interest in mass public cheating). I could confirm to you that Mike Harari was indeed a diplomat at the Israeli Embassy in London until very recent, but I am not sure at all if it was him who was expelled in connection with the Dubai's affair.

Dimitri, could you give us the exact numbers to show how 150kt is not too much for this operation?

Also, can you explain the reason why TV stations knew they were to digitally produce the planes?

I am not going to argue about these claims above, since I can't afford to lose my precious time on this, but, I will place here my comments, once only. Don't expect that I will continue to argue over this. So, my comments are as follows:

How come the fragile windows aren't turned to dust and blow out? ------------------ lie. All 'fragile windows' of the WTC Twin Towers and those of the WTC-7 in areas affected by 'crushing wave' were completely pulverized, i.e. 'turned to complete microscopic dust'. Glass dust was available along with steel dust, furniture dust, carpet dust, human beings dust, concrete dust, and all other kinds of dust.

How come nothing in the area experienced the same nuclear shock wave? ---------------- because if you watched my movie attentively enough you will notice that the 'crushing wave was directly straightly upwards along the targeted Tower's body and to nowhere else, except this. Even some lower parts of the Twin Towers corners that came within a kind of 'dead space' were spared by pulverization. So, why should it affect anything else if it was not directed there? All you have to do it to watch the video material attentively and you will get answer to all your questions.

It just conviently went right up thru the core of 3 buildings without every touching it's surroundings? ----------- yes. Watch parts 10, 15 and 16 of the movie for more details.

Again, it didn't even affect the windows. ------------- lie. It did. All windows were pulverized along with steel, carpets, furniture, concrete floors and the rest of materials everywhere where such windows occurred on the way of propagation of the 'crushing wave'.

His theory falls apart.--------------- I think it is your poor attempt to assault on my theory 'falls apart', not the actual 'theory'.

Looks like a classic demolition to me with regular explosives. ----------------- I suggest you read my web site www.nuclear-demolition.com for detailed explanation on why it is not possible to demolish a modern steel-framed building with conventional explosives. It is explained very clearly. It will take not more than 20 minutes reading that explanation.

Not nukes.---------------- it is up to you. I am not going to insist, neither to argue any more over this subject.

Thanks for your attention.
Dimitri Khalezov.

Another question I have is why don't you mention the USGS report about Strontium and Barium being present in the dust samples they took from WTC area? This would seem to be very excellent supporting evidence of a nuclear event.

Dimitri, one last question and I thank you for your time:

The Mariott Hotel was also directly above one of the devices that went off. Why not did the compression waves take down the hotel at the exact same time in the exact same way? (or did it?)

It is difficult to answer. There are many considerations why it is difficult to build anything there. 1) Purely moral aspect - many consider this place as being a mass grave that should retain the status of a 'cemetery'. 2) It could be a technical problem because of former cavities left by underground nuclear explosions might not allow constructing any high-rise buildings even if we presume the cavities were somehow filled with concrete. 3) Fear of exposing the ‘awful secret’ if mass construction works would be allowed in the area. Many construction workers would wonder what happened with former bedrock in these areas; many others might bring Geiger counters with them and measure radiation (while now this is under strict control). Besides, it is possible that during drilling for a reason of making foundations of a new building some volcanic glass, or, worse, highly-radioactive materials would be discovered. 4) It could be also a combination of the above three.

To be honest with you, I do not sell the book yet. It has not yet been published, and not yet even finally edited. It is very difficult to find a publisher for such a thing. Many attempted to publish it, but all of them found some pretext to disappear at the last moment. So you comment is out of target. Unfortunately.

Hi. I am very sorry to hear that. But I suggest you don't be afraid to go to see doctors immediately. Sooner you do it sooner your treatment will start. It is very much possible you inhaled radioactive gases and have some sort of particles irradiating you from inside with alpha-radiation (typical chronic radiation sickness that shows cumulative effect and reveals itself in a couple of years time). The picture you described matches chronic radiation sickness. I suggest you don't go to general doctors, but try to find doctors who are specialists in radiation sickness and tell them straight away - you worked on ground zero and suspect you inhaled some radioactive materials with alpha-radiation. At least you will immediately get proper attention and appropriate treatment. I suggest you suing the US authorities too - as many ground zero responders do. At least, it will get you some quick compensation for your suffering.
Sincerely yours,
Dimitri.