9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE *****

I cannot find these videos on youtube !!!!!!!!!!!!!

why?

long story but they have been pulled. i spent hours watching them and its a fact - it took a lot of energy released all at once to pulverize those buildings. 150kt sounds about right to me.

Look here: [link to links.mail333.su]

Seek and ye shall find.

people are in the process of uploading video to DiscloseTv as we speak

(it is taking time because of the download restrictions )

But the video is live again ,as for now,on this website
the final chapters are being uploaded now

[link to scottishsovereignsontheland.ning.com]

To the asker above.
Regarding the newspapers - I would be pleased to provide you the exact date, but, unfortunately, it was more than 25 years ago. I really can't remember now exactly. Besides, you could presume that the 'good guys' are not so stupid either - if they went as far as re-printing ALL post-9/11 dictionaries (to modify meaning of 'ground zero'), don't you think that they also ransacked all libraries and all patent offices (I dare to claim that the Controlled Demolition Inc also held nothing less than a patent for their nuclear demolition know-how which is very unlikely to be found now, considering circumstances)? However, I have no obligation to provide such an evidence as you demand – be thankful for that I was able to recollect that I saw that thing in US newspapers. Imagine that it is not the main part of my evidence. First of all I might omit mentioning that I saw it in the US newspapers (since I can’t remember details exactly) and in this case I would not have any obligation to substantiate this. However, I preferred to mention it, because I really remember it – perhaps someone else in US would recollect it too (and at least two of my watchers recollected it, at least). But it does not mean at all that I have any obligation to provide you an actual newspaper. You demand is simply too much. Just try to use your common sense – if I preferred NOT to mention about the newspapers during the interview, it would definitely relieve me from obliging claims like yours, but it by no means would diminish any credibility of my explanation in general. I would, still, be able to prove that the WTC was demolished by the nukes – firstly, because I successfully explained the actual mechanics of the WTC pulverization and collapse (and it is pretty self-evident); secondly – because I pointed it out that only places of nuclear explosions were called ‘ground zero’ in pre-9/11 US tradition; and as a further proof I demonstrated that the US government has even attempted to re-define the ‘ground zero’ meaning in all post-9/11 dictionaries. Should be enough, I think. You demand to provide exact details in regard to 25 years old newspaper is nothing but redundant, to say the least.

Regarding your doubts that I allegedly want to ‘muddy waters’ and so to get the US authorities out of the hook (or so you implied). You have to understand first of all, that the rules of justice shall be applicable even to the worst of the worst criminals. If Bush and Co. were not manly enough to do ‘the right thing’ (meaning to commit suicide) after the demolished the WTC by mistake, and if the were cowardly enough not to admit it and even to send gullible ground zero responders to their certain death, this say a lot. I do admit that the Bush administration, as well as some officials in the military, CIA, FBI, and in some local administration are cowardly criminals who have to be punished for all they did. However, I still maintain that it was NOT the US officials who planned the 9/11 – they were simply tricked into it by a very clever set-up by the real 9/11 planners. Whether you like it or not, I do not care. I still believe this. Just as a logical proof I could provide you this point. Suppose, Bush and Co. were looking for a pretext to attack ‘oil rich states’ and lay their hands on their oil or whatever. In addition, they badly need to get rid of the Twin Towers, because of some commercial reason. You have to realize, that in this case they DID NOT NEED to nuke-down the Towers. Not to say that they did not need to stage a ridiculous, totally unexplainable and utterly suspicious attack on the Pentagon. All they needed is to send two (or even one) ‘hijacked’ plane on autopilot full of corpses (or even live citizens as a variety) into the Twin Towers and to blame it nicely, without any blunder to some trust-worthy ‘hijackers’ from Muslim world. Irrespectively of whether aluminum planes would penetrate thick double-walled perimeters of the Twin Towers or would be simply smashed flat and fall back to the street, the US public would be outraged enough to support any war against Iraq or Afghanistan. More than that, the US Government would claim later that the WTC were structurally damaged and need to be demolished/disassembled, because after planes impacts it is ‘no longer safe’. All the alleged ‘desired goals’ could have been achieved by ‘evil’ Bush administration with the very minimum of efforts, and with no suspicions at all. Just try to use your common sense in this realization. Neither Bush, nor his supposedly ‘evil’ administration DID NOT NEED to actually demolish the Towers, not to say that they did not need to attack the Pentagon. Add here the extremely awkward position the Bush administration found itself immediately after nuking the Towers and shooting down at least 2 passenger planes (flights 93 and 77, at least). And do you believe that they planned to appear in such an awkward situation well in advance? You must be insane to believe so. How about common sense and elementary logic?

Regarding your claim that no original movie is available for the 9/11 affair. I know this is claimed by ‘simonshack’ and his followers. But I don’t care what these lunatics claim. I am certain that only plane impacts were falsified, while the actual Towers collapses were not. Therefore I believe that the most 9/11 movies available today are genuine. I like to use my common sense and so far it had never failed me. But if you sincerely believe that ALL without any exception 9/11 video footages available today were falsified (not only ‘planes crashes’, but ALL the rest – including Towers collapses and news releases), then it is too a serious case for me to treat. Welcome to ‘simonshack’s’ lunatic asylum…

The video quality in the above mentioned site is very low. Besides, outdated files are used there. New updated files are available now that include very important recently discovered evidence. All newest versions of that video in high quality format is available now here: [link to links.mail333.su]

Don't use low-quality outdated files, when you have chance to get the high-quality updated ones.
-

they didn't need to BRING DOWN the WTCs or attack the Pentagon and/or Captial Building (didn't reach)...

...but they did.

There appears to have been a concerted effort to TOTALLY WIPE OUT CONGRESS and decapitate the capitalist beast. Wonder why the FED don't wanna be audited? There'll have been A LOT of money gone into the 9-11 operation.

In fact, did Rumsfeld ever find his 'missing' $2.4 TRILLION from 9-10?

here is the full version as a torrent file in a good quality mp4.
i dont know though if its the actual version of mr.khalezovs interview but it should serve well :

[link to tracker.concen.org]

Yes, the above tracker is the latest one, I checked it just now. It also contains not only latest video files in HQ mp4, but also all pdf reference files (but not dictionaries files).

Dimitri

Come and Reply to the post i opened on DisclosTV forum

[link to www.disclose.tv]


(register it takes 1 min - you can give any email address)

2 guys are talking about spyware etc in the download files


please respond there before things get out of hand

thanks

bump

bump

I just noticed the above post. Lucky man. I suggest you also send the girl this link: [link to www.nirs.org] and you may have more favors from her :)

[link to www.wikipatents.com]

i recall hearing someone say the buildings were flawed and weakening due to two different metals touching each other and causing corrosion. hhhmmmmmm. source of the idea? proof of patent? lol

Hero of Soviet Union Dimitri Khalezov

I am glad to announce :

CHECKMATE !

all the videos ,latest ,HQ,

are available here (safest place on the web)

[link to www.disclose.tv]


Spread the word guys

Hi, Ron. Thanks a lot for your efforts. But it seems that part 10 is completely missing there?

Why don't you write me a message? - check details on my web site, contacts page.

Hi Dimitri

I have answered you in the first video responses on Disclose tv.

All parts ARE there

[link to www.disclose.tv]

this is my final post here.

I will be posting on the video website forum

[link to www.disclose.tv]

Epic FAIL! Not a single video works.

may be you just don't have right codecs installed on your computer? what are the actual symptoms of 'not working'???

This discussion seems to be dead. No more comments? No more questions? Everyone has already understood everything? Then share your understanding with others...

Don't be ashamed to post here, especially considering that no registration is required here to post.

Dimitri , they have now unveiled plans for a 13-story Mosque-on the site of a 'building damaged in the attacks'.


"The building, just two blocks from the World Trade Center site, has been mostly vacant since it was damaged in the Sept. 11 attacks, when the landing gear of a hijacked airliner tore through its roof. "

[link to www.tribecatrib.com]

(humble prediction)
The 'truther community' may probably be ready for additional important 'revelations' about the area broadcasted with scientific integrity and style of swagg elegance not altogether unfamiliar.

lol...+1

Very good idea... I suggest you sending them this link:
[link to www.nirs.org]

They might change their opinions about building anything there.

World Trade Center Demolition ...

[link to wtcdemolition.blogspot.com]

via ronisrael, who posted on the .tv forum

[link to www.youtube.com] - the pit's top not jumping up, less than 600 views, but where did they get the access to such recordings in the first place?

could it be Chicago Stock Exchange gradually leaking them?

why for instance has not it been possible to scrap the nuke glass bubbles from inside and dump everything to China ?

or the city should be totally closed as Dimitri suggests

also frankly i don't understand ronisrael's efforts in bankrupting the NY city

Dimitri is more or less an agent of CSE&Co, he dines with people who bounces superpowers into blowing up peoples appts with subway toy-train nukes, symmetric numerology and all, but aren't NY and Israel like allies or whatever

To the poster above: it seems that some 'good guys' made your brains think in a very strange way: it appears to you that the truth (which is an absolute thing) should be politicized and made relative. Meaning that no Russians could say the truth to the Americans (because they are enemies). And no Israelis could say truth to the Americans if this truth for some reason is not convenient to them (because they are friends). Your approach seems to be one of the best approaches to justify the 9/11 Commission Report - because the so-called 'truth' it contains is absolutely 'politically correct' and is very 'friendly' in any sense. I wish you a very good luck, man, in your future understanding of the reality. But one warning though: before posting the link to a shallow-subsurface nuclear explosion video you would better watch the discussed video which deals with DEEP underground nuclear explosions in granite rock, not with shallow sub-surface ones in sandy soil of Nevada desert.

To the rest of people. This discussion was long and very productive - it managed to run near 19 pages, which is a lot. But, unfortunately, it seems to be dead now. No one wants to post here anymore. If there are some people who wish to revive it, you are welcome. It is easy to do, because this Forum does not need even registration of users for posting and every 'anonymous coward' could post here just in two clicks. However, it is possible to avoid being called an 'anonymous coward' by simply typing something in the 'User name' box while composing your message.

In any case, there is a new 9/11thology forum, just opened yesterday on [link to www.911thology.com] It will be entirely dedicated to serious discussions of the 9/11. It will be nothing to do with so-called 'turthers' who completely lost their former credibility and proved themselves to be completely brainwashed by their FBI-appointed leaders and therefore incapable to accept elementary things - such as the fact that aluminum can not penetrate steel, for example, or that only a place where nukes were used could be called 'ground zero' and never a place where so-called 'nano-thermite' was used could be called as such. Therfore everyone interested in interesting, productive, discussions in regard to the 9/11 and other related issues is welcome to join this new forum here: [link to www.911thology.com]

Best wishes.

Thermobaric weapons @ WTC on 9-11?

among the wacky, loopy, nutzo, crazy and generally insane theories that have grown up around 9-11 like holographic planes, mini-nukes, Star Wars ray guns, molecular disassociation, the 911 Commission, NIST, Osama Bin Laden and/or the Israelis, thermobaric weapons may have successfully avoided investigation.

Until now...

[link to mikephilbin.blogspot.com]

Places of explosions of thermobaric charges are not being called 'ground zero'. While places of nuclear explosions are traditionally called 'ground zero'. At least in the US.
In case it helps.

Everyone is welcome to register and to promote new 9/11thology dedicated forum here: [link to www.911thology.com]

Make this new forum as the real stronghold of the real 9/11 truth-seekers. Everyone is welcome.

should it then not be called UNDERGROUND ZERO?

or UNDERSURFACE ZERO?

it's a strange one to use ... anyway, here's where it's from:

World Trade Center

The term has also been used to describe the site of the World Trade Center in New York City, which was destroyed in the September 11, 2001 attacks. The adoption of this term by the mainstream North American media with reference to the September 11th attacks began as early as 7:47 p.m. (EDT) on that day, when CBS News reporter Jim Axelrod said, "Less than four miles behind me is where the Twin Towers stood this morning. But not tonight. Ground Zero, as it's being described, in today's terrorist attacks that have sent aftershocks rippling across the country."

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

and then there's this from 2006:

CBS News Announces Major New Correspondent Assignments:
Jim Axelrod Is Named Chief White House Correspondent
[link to www.cbscorporation.com]

hmm.......