Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,003 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,835,754
Pageviews Today: 2,401,136Threads Today: 503Posts Today: 10,455
06:11 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

**foreshadowing** 'All bets are off' if US under WMD attack: Clinton

 
RedSheDevil
Logical Geek

User ID: 641806
Canada
04/12/2010 12:03 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
**foreshadowing** 'All bets are off' if US under WMD attack: Clinton
Well we know how easily they prove WMD for an AGENDA..now you can see who they have defined as the enemy and the expected Biological Weapon on US soil theory.

[link to ca.news.yahoo.com]

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Sunday the United States could not rule out using nuclear weapons if it came under biological attack, saying in that case "all bets are off."


Both Clinton and Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in joint television interviews that Iran and North Korea represented exceptions to the limits on a US nuclear response, as both have defied UN resolutions on their atomic programs.


"We leave ourselves a lot of room for contingencies," Clinton said.


"If we can prove that a biological attack originated in a country that attacked us, then all bets are off," Clinton said in an interview with CBS's "Face the Nation."


Clinton was referring to a new US nuclear policy unveiled last week that restricts the use of atomic weapons against non-nuclear states that comply with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).


Asked why Iran and North Korea were considered exceptions, Gates said: "Well, because they're not in compliance with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. So for them, all bets are off. All the options are on table."


Clinton and Gates said a new arms control deal with Russia and the revised nuclear policy would bolster President Barack Obama's diplomatic leverage as he seeks to isolate Iran and North Korea over their nuclear programs.


Both cabinet officers rejected criticism from some Republicans in Congress that Obama's approach had sent a signal of weakness, and that cuts to the nuclear arms stockpile undermined US "deterrence."


"We have still a very powerful nuclear arsenal," Gates told NBC's "Meet the Press."


Obama's nuclear policy "sets forth a process by which we will be able to modernize our nuclear stockpile to make it more reliable: safer and more secure and effective." he said.


Apart from nuclear weapons, the US military was building up missile defense systems and investing in long-range missiles armed with conventional warheads -- known as "prompt global strike," Gates said.


"We have in addition to the nuclear deterrent today, a couple of things we didn't have in the Soviet days," he said.
I really am not nearly as interesting as I should be but I certainly will try to find interest in nearly everything I can be. self quote.
Seamus

User ID: 854278
United States
04/12/2010 12:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **foreshadowing** 'All bets are off' if US under WMD attack: Clinton
It doesn't help that the article doesn't state the exact question the 'Faze the Nation' reporter put to clinton... but that she gave such a reply... ""All Bets are Off"" ...
While Gates was being interviewed by a different network show, this time: "Meet the Depressed" and offered the same trite phrase: ""All Bets are Off""...

tells me both politicians were on TV for a very specific purpose - to try to talk tough. They met with their bosses earlier and this phrase came up. "all bets are off' and was thought that it was a good phrase that said something while saying nothing and therefore both mouthpieces used it today.

Probably that is because of Obama's statement last week that the US would NOT reply with WMD's if nuked or chemically or biologically attacked.
The administration called the networks and said: "Listen.. we need to put Hil and Gates on the Sunday AM shows to talk tough to deflect criticism felt by the white house by Obama's statements last week."


Either that OR they are preparing us for what they are planning to do to us.

Or, both options are true.

Last Edited by Seamus on 04/12/2010 12:17 AM
'When Plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men,
they create for themselves, in the course of time,
a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.'
Frederic Bastiat, 'The Law'
1850

++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it, and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
JohnSwinton, 1830-1901, Former chief-of-staff New York Times
++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"The bold effort the present bank has made to control the Government, the distress it has wantonly produced ... are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American People should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution (The Bank of the United States), or the establishment of another like it." Andrew Jackson (December 2, 1834)
RedSheDevil (OP)
Logical Geek

User ID: 641806
Canada
04/12/2010 12:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **foreshadowing** 'All bets are off' if US under WMD attack: Clinton
It doesn't help that the article doesn't state the exact question the 'Faze the Nation' reporter put to clinton... but that she gave such a reply... ""All Bets are Off"" ...
While Gates was being interviewed by a different network show, this time: "Meet the Depressed" and offered the same trite phrase: ""All Bets are Off""...

tells me both politicians were on TV for a very specific purpose - to try to talk tough. They met with their bosses earlier and this phrase came up. "all bets are off' and was thought that it was a good phrase that said something while saying nothing and therefore both mouthpieces used it today.

Probably that is because of Obama's statement last week that the US would NOT reply with WMD's if nuked or chemically or biologically attacked.
The administration called the networks and said: "Listen.. we need to put Hil and Gates on the Sunday AM shows to talk tough to deflect criticism felt by the white house by Obama's statements last week."


Either that OR they are preparing us for what they are planning to do to us.

Or, both options are true.
 Quoting: Seamus



When you think Obama was AWOL for the White house press for two hours today and then the same statement coming from both Hil and Gates.. You know that they are certainly preparing something. To harshen the line from the Obama comment but to specifically call out the two key runners who are unlikely to do a biological weapon in the USA (perhaps Iran to do something in Afghanistan with US troops) then you start to think it more than likely will be BLAMED on them then proven to be them.

So IRAQ all over again. I wonder how they are going to get America on the WMD bandwagon again after the last IRAQ failure to find the mass weapons..

BIO Dirty bomb they don't need to prove a stockpile just point one bomb to one nation to get it done.

I vote IRAQ before North Korea but depending on the need to get into the ASIA area with heavy force it could swing to be close to CHINA to keep things in line..

Either way the statement struck me and the article as well for I saw the whole interview but it was what was EDITED for the sheeple that made me think.. Yep a classic conditioning setup.

With IRAQ wanting to move 5 million people out of Tehran.. I say they got the hint.... Earthquakes.. yeah OK now you worry about them.. That is like the mass exodus of Californians for the same reason.... Likely not due to Earthquakes....

Summertime doom on the way.. Just got to get through sweeps month on TV so focus can be on CNN not IDOL... June to July launch seems just about right.. Fourth of July would be my guess.. large masses of people.. excellent WMD strategy and of course fuel the emotional support the GOV needs for sheeple support...

But SEAMUS good call for noticing both had the same speech. I have to watch the other drone warning today.

Last Edited by RedSheDevil on 04/12/2010 12:34 AM
I really am not nearly as interesting as I should be but I certainly will try to find interest in nearly everything I can be. self quote.
Leeloominai

User ID: 869023
United States
04/12/2010 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **foreshadowing** 'All bets are off' if US under WMD attack: Clinton
When you think Obama was AWOL for the White house press for two hours today and then the same statement coming from both Hil and Gates.. You know that they are certainly preparing something. To harshen the line from the Obama comment but to specifically call out the two key runners who are unlikely to do a biological weapon in the USA (perhaps Iran to do something in Afghanistan with US troops) then you start to think it more than likely will be BLAMED on them then proven to be them.

So IRAQ all over again. I wonder how they are going to get America on the WMD bandwagon again after the last IRAQ failure to find the mass weapons..

BIO Dirty bomb they don't need to prove a stockpile just point one bomb to one nation to get it done.

I vote IRAQ before North Korea but depending on the need to get into the ASIA area with heavy force it could swing to be close to CHINA to keep things in line..

Either way the statement struck me and the article as well for I saw the whole interview but it was what was EDITED for the sheeple that made me think.. Yep a classic conditioning setup.

With IRAQ wanting to move 5 million people out of Tehran.. I say they got the hint.... Earthquakes.. yeah OK now you worry about them.. That is like the mass exodus of Californians for the same reason.... Likely not due to Earthquakes....

Summertime doom on the way.. Just got to get through sweeps month on TV so focus can be on CNN not IDOL... June to July launch seems just about right.. Fourth of July would be my guess.. large masses of people.. excellent WMD strategy and of course fuel the emotional support the GOV needs for sheeple support...

But SEAMUS good call for noticing both had the same speech. I have to watch the other drone warning today.
 Quoting: RedSheDevil


I'm really glad my hubby will be back from the middle east this summer!
BIG Badaboom!

"it's not only at our doorstep, some moran has lit it on fire!" ~Anonymous Coward 919411 talking about doom
RedSheDevil (OP)
Logical Geek

User ID: 641806
Canada
04/12/2010 11:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **foreshadowing** 'All bets are off' if US under WMD attack: Clinton
I'm really glad my hubby will be back from the middle east this summer!
 Quoting: Leeloominai


I hope for his safe return too.. too many people in the worng place for the wrong reasons and the wrong time it seems.. I hope a peaceful renunion for you this summer.
I really am not nearly as interesting as I should be but I certainly will try to find interest in nearly everything I can be. self quote.

News