PLANET X? OR SOMETHING ELSE???

omg its the planet of Photoshop!

It's a ufo. It's easy to understand how someone would mistake it for a star though. Any bright shining object will first be thought to be a star or planet or airplane, but the closeup reveals that it's a ufo.

According to this prophecy by Our Lady of Knock, Ireland, we will be seeing a "second moon" here soon:

Joe Coleman's words of his experiences with Blessed Mother:

"I am a genuine visionary and seer for Our Lady and have publicly predicted 8 appartioins of Our Lady at the Holy Shrine of Knock. I have been publicly ridiculed, mocked and jeered for daring to reveal the message given to me and my fellow visionary the late Keith Henderson since 2009 all of which relate to the Second Coming. Our Lady has shown signs in the skies in Ireland on four dates witnessed by up to 10,000 when the sun began to spin, tremble, gyrate in the sky with many claimig to have seen her face and three crosses in the sky during these periods. A TV Documentary was filmed and is due for broadcast in Ireland next June. The next apparition is on 11 May 2010 at Knock. The Catholic Church have given me a really bad time but I, along with five other people (none of whom knew each other beforehand) all witnessed Our Lady manifest in the chapel on 10th March one of whom is a skeptical journalist (I can tell you she is still in shock! But she believes now). The messages are now urgent. Our Lady, who will NEVER reveal the date of the return to Earth of Jesus. But she has told me that a new moon will appear in the skies shortly. She also predicts that crosses will be clearly seen int he skies across Ireland in the lead up to the next apparition. She tells me there is not much time. I have been shown visions of Hell, Purgorary, Heaven - yes they are all real. They exist. Most importantly she wants us to pray for conversion so that souls can be salvaged. Volunteers have put together a basic website to keep the world up to date on the messages. www.knockapparitions.com God Bless You All. I can assure you Mankind, as Our Lady have revealed to me is now suffering the cleansing as prophesied. She has told me that the Volcano eruptions will get worse in Europe where the skies will turn even darker. Satan, the deceiver, is rampant in the world and has turned people in their millions into hardened atheists. God Bless you All."

I DID NOT MAKE THESE PHOTO'S I PHOTOSHOP!

MR.XIII

ITS A BRAND NEW CAMERA! ITS AS CLEAN AS IT WILL EVER GET!

MR.XIII

THANKS!

MR.XIII

I'LL POST THE OTHERS NOW!

Does this also look like a ship to you?
[link to i14.photobucket.com]

HI! HERE ARE THE REST OF MY PICS!

ZOOM IN ON THEM!

ALL MY PICS ARE REAL!!!! NO PHOTO SHOPING DONE!!!!

[link to i420.photobucket.com]

[link to i420.photobucket.com]

[link to i420.photobucket.com]

[link to i420.photobucket.com]


MR.XIII

Closeup reveals that you need a tripod (and a remote release cable) for night shots like this. It's called camera shake:
Without tripod:
[link to i14.photobucket.com]
With tripod:
[link to i14.photobucket.com]
Another fun "ship" caused inadequate steadiness of the camera:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
My personal favorite, are these "ships" flying near a bright star or planet?
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Here's a closeup on one of the "ships":
[link to i319.photobucket.com]

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 05/03/2010 11:05 AM

Don't need photoshop to make "UFOs" when you're not using a tripod and a remote release cable.

HI! HERE ARE THE REST OF MY PICS!

ZOOM IN ON THEM!

ALL MY PICS ARE REAL!!!! NO PHOTO SHOPING DONE!!!!

[link to i420.photobucket.com]

[link to i420.photobucket.com]

[link to i420.photobucket.com]

[link to i420.photobucket.com]


MR.XIII

I SEE NOW! THANKS! YES! I DID NOT USE A TRIPOD! SORRY EVERYONE!

I THOUGHT I HAD ALL MY PICS STEADY?! WHAT THE HELL?

MR.XIII

It's a common mistake. Our hands just aren't capable of holding a camera steady enough for night shots without causing the stars to turn to squiggles. A tripod and a cable release (or a timed delay exposure if you're in a pinch) are mandatory.

Many millions believe that at some point (less than 85 years)something will cause many cometary or asteroid size objects to hit the Earth.

That is a FACT. How will this play out?

Will it be a brown dwarf that enters into our system and pulls the objects along? Or perhaps the BD will hit the moon and the resulting ejecta will hit the Earth.

There will be changes coming in the Sun. It will somehow burn the earth. I'm not sure if it will be the radiation, or the first stages of a super novae, but it will happen before 2093.

Also, something will cause much dust/ash/dirt to be lifted into the earths atmosphere that will create a natural nuclear winter blocking out much of the suns light and also the moons.

Many millions believe this will happen and so do I...So nothing wrong with looking to the skies now, as it will be devastating to life as we know it.

OD has spoken.

OMG NANCY REPLIED... thread fail, sorry thats like farting at a party

Ignore AstroNut, he's a paid disinformant. He's here because you're captured something very valuable. The Dark Twin will be showing up more and more. The ancients spoke of it in the days prior to a pole shift. Here's detail from my last newsletter.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

From the Kolbrin:

Scrolls 33:12 Great Mistress of the stars, let us abide in peace, for we fear the revelations of your horns. Remain ever constant as a good wife to the Lord of the Day. When women are as men and inconsistent as women, the hour appraoches when the Great Lady will wander. When man and woman meet as one in likeness, the Fiery Heralds will appear in the darkness of the sky vault.
Origins 8:3 They worshipped in error, the malignant horned star and her escorts.
Creation 4:5 Then came the day when all things became still and apprehensive, for God cuased a sign to appear in the Heavens, so that men should know the Earth would be afflicted, and the sign was a strange star.
Creation 4:6 The star grew and and waxed to great brightness and was awesome to behold. It put forth horns and sang, being unlike any other ever seen.
Creation 4:7 Then God manifested Himself in the Heavens, His voice was as the roll of thunders and He was clothed with smoke and fire. He carried lightnings in His hand and His breath, falling upon the Earth, brought forth brimstone and embers.

The Hopi talk of a Blue Star Kachina. The Dark Twin, when at an angle that sunlight can be reflected from its surface back to Earth, will reflect blue light, with an occasional flash of yellow, as depicted in Issue 181 of this newsletter. Scallion's interpretation of this is that the Blue Star will appear from behind the Sun, and indeed, the Dark Twin did emerge from behind the Sun, coming round in the orbit it shares with Earth, in early 2004 when it was captured on film and seen by naked eye in the evening sky.

When the Blue Star Kachina makes its appearance in the heavens, the Fifth World will emerge.


Does the Dark Twin show up in Hindu mythology, as the god Kali? If Shiva represents Nibiru, aka Planet X, the Planet of the Passage, then he has two wives - Kali and Parvati. Who might those wives represent? Kali is often represented as standing over Shiva's dead body. Indeed, after the terrible last weeks, when Planet X appears in the skies and potential clashes with the Dark Twin might occur, it would seem that the Dark Twin survived while Planet X passes on. Once again, the Dark Twin is depicted as having a blue tone.

Any proof for that slander? Of course not, because it isn't true. Nice logical fallacy Nancy.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Funny how you didn't have a problem using the information I gave you on your "mercury/venus out of place" threads to change your claim for the saturday zetatalk thread from Venus being out of place to Venus being forced into the correct location by the zetas. You shifted your claim based on what you said you "goaded me" into saying, so I must not be as untruthful as you now claim.

You know, you don't HAVE to remain completely ignorant your whole life. There are MANY web sites and programs that will show you what's in the sky for any location and any date and time. Venus is dominating the western sky after sunset right now.

[link to www.astronomy.com]

[link to www.skyandtelescope.com]

[link to earthsky.org]

[link to amazing-space.stsci.edu]

What complete bullshit.

[link to www.nomorestupidlights.com]

Put new ZT on the web at
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
and am featuring all this in the upcoming newsletter Issue183. The Zetas have the ONLY explanation for the blue tone of what is Venus, and the apparent debris around it. Good show, Illinois photographer!

Blue Clues

What was that huge bright star with a blue hue captured on film in Illinois on May 2, 2010 at 9:20 pm?

I live in Illinois and tonigth at 9:20 pm Central Time I looked to the North/West and saw a huge super bright star! I took many pics. But, something happened in my camera or me moving it? But I did a lot more and they all came out weird! Having more than 1 star in the pics. 3 or more moving? Here is a pic with houses in it. The 2nd pic is the same but I used PhotoShop to zoom in on it. What is it? Any comments would help.

IMAGE: Zoomed Image [link to www.zetatalk.com]

A lively discussion ensued on the GodlikeProduction
Thread: PLANET X? OR SOMETHING ELSE???
message board where opinions ranged from speculation that it was a UFO, a photographer with a shaky hand, or a perfectly normal Venus. If it was a shaky hand, then the smaller objects in the sky did not squiggle accordingly, nor did the house lights
[link to i420.photobucket.com]
captured on one of the photos squiggle. Certainly Venus was supposed to be at that general location, at Azimuth 292 Altitude 8, which is in the NW, but Venus does not have a blue hue, nor it is cluttered in appearance with what seems to be debris. The object was huge, not starlight, as this actual size in the five photos shows:

IMAGE: Actual Size [link to www.zetatalk.com]

The Dark Twin is a black hunk of rock which only reflects some blue and yellow light. We captured it in photographs in early 2004 when it came round the Sun, a bluish/yellowish orb.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
People saw it naked eye at one point
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
when the reflection of sunlight was good angle too, same coloration.
The color in these photos is unmistakable, at first glance and when zoomed 600%. Color inversion also shows the opposite of a pale blue, a pale pink, to be the dominant color. In Issue 181
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
of this newsletter, a monster version of the Dark Twin showed up, where light fanned out and then was turned back toward Earth. This was centered at RA 11, Declination 0, so not that far from these recent photos which I estimate to be RA 4, Declination 22. So is this Venus, looming close, or the Dark Twin? The Zetas explain.

IMAGE: Color Inversion [link to www.zetatalk.com]

ZetaTalk Explanation 5/4/2010:
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
It is both, and thus the situation is confused. Venus casts light, and the Dark Twin adds to the hue. There is a astrophysics term called blooming, which means that light which passes by another gravity object pulls toward it, and thus the light emitted or reflected by that gravity object is increased. This is Venus, with light from the Dark Twin in the near vicinity pulled toward it, and thus the confusing picture of what looks like a tail, or swirling debris, around Venus. Does this mean that Venus and the Dark Twin are in line of sight with each other? The Dark Twin is behind the Earth, on the darkside of the Earth, outside of their shared orbit in an attempt to evade the Earth and to keep them from colliding. Having come up behind the Earth in their shared orbit, it is thus to the left of the Earth. Venus is in the cup, sunside of the Earth and also to the left of the Earth at this time though much closer than assumed. So these two planets are nowhere near each other. The light causing the blooming effect is sunlight that has bounced off the Dark Twin and returned almost directly toward the Sun, encountering Venus on the way. This light bends sharply due to the gravity of Venus, thus turning toward Earth. If you think this single happenstance is interesting, just wait! Things are going to get very interesting!

The problem with this logic (or lack of logic) is that it assumes that everything we see in the skies these days is explained by NASA and the 'its all normal' logic. Its not normal.

No that's YOUR shit you're smelling because you've got your head up your ass.

Venus is to the South-West.
OP says he saw it to the North.

Probably just a star.

Last Edited by Levski on 05/04/2010 10:21 AM

Venus is not to the south west. It is to the north west. These pics of the OP can vary well be Venus.

Nancy, if Planet X is on it's merry way whats the point in trying to make people believe you?, what will it achieve if your lost pink fairy planet shows up? If X does come within coowee of hometown earth no one would survive anyhow so why worry about it?. Iv'e been lurking here for a long time and I just don't see the sense in it, get on with your life, live it now and don't worry about what may or may not happen.

It is very hard to take a good pic of a star or planet.

Everyone try it for yourself...tonight, look to the West...then look to the bottom right of the western direction, which is towards the north....you will see a star popping out in the sky, which is Venus.

Then try to take a pic and post it here...try it on zoom and not on zoom.

Take several, so you can see how easy it is to distort the image you see with your naked eye. Especially if you are holding the camera yourself and not using a mount, images like the ones in the OP can happen.

So after all these years of claiming that your "Dark Twin" couldn't be seen, you have decided to start saying it is this bright in the sky?

Nancy, the photographer already admitted he did not use a tripod. That always results in shots like this:
[link to i14.photobucket.com]
With a tripod the problem is solved:
[link to i14.photobucket.com]
Bright house lights don't squiggle; they overexpose too much to see a low amplitude high frequency squiggle like the ones above. They blur into oblong shapes like in the above photo, but they don't "squiggle." Interestingly though, there IS a dimmer light on the ground that squiggled into the same shape as Venus in the sky. It's directly below Venus next to a porch on a house on the ground. Oops. Guess the zeta's were wrong again!

This is also Venus:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Venus doesn't really have a purple hue either, but when you're not resolving the planet, when it's just a point-like light source, it's even more susceptible to false color from white balance issues and optical coatings on the lens.

This picture was taken the same night as the above, with the same camera (a DSLR so the lens could be changed), but with a telescope that actually resolved the shape of the planet:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Voila, no more false color problems.

What debris? I don't see debris. I do see compression artifacts all over the image when you blow the levels on it, but that's not unique to Venus; all the other light sources show the same thing.

The "object" was a squiggle from unsteadiness of the camera. Even the photographer himself realized this after it was explained.

Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 05/04/2010 11:05 AM

Could you provide a close-up of that ground light squiggle for comparison?