My thought is they are hoping to get a general consensus of the public suggesting nukes.

If they get enough buy-in they can more easily justify the destruction caused by the nuclear option.

What we need is for someone who understands all this to inform the public which would be more catastrophic allowing the leak to reach equilibrium or nuking it. Anyone?

And is there any guarantee that a nuke would stop it rather that causing additional leaks?



A nuke is the most dangerous option and has to be prevented at all costs. It could cause an earthquake and the breaking of the oil volcano.


I agree with you AC. Maybe GLP'ers can organize global mass protests to the news agencies and politicians and maybe gather en-mass for protests in front of all the BP gas/petrol stations to inform the public. NO NUCLEAR OPTION!!!!!!!!!!

How does next Saturday work for everyone?? If they haven't deployed the nukes by then.