I have come to the conclusion that you might be right, but without scale we won't know. That much is clear.

On the other hand, and probably SEEMING to be a deflection from this one issue, but I don't intend it as such, there is much more to the PX story than this.

Nancy/Zetas and all others who talk of an extra-wild wobble from PX could be wrong about this. We know NL is wrong about several things over time, and that's okay. If she's for real with the Zetas, then as we determine that hypothesis, we'd have to say, she could be for real about this and still get wrong messages, lying messages, or misunderstand the messages. So ... to continue with you on this, let's say the Pole Star is fine. I am not sure of the scale of this image and it might be that our Pole is fine.

And I'm sure you'd love to leave it there. "The rest is nonsense too," I'm sure you'd say. But detectives have been wrong about one lead and still the gang they originally suspected turns out to be the culprit; it was a misleading lead! So ...

In fact, the other evidence for a possible PX is far stronger: a torque-looking action on our Chandler Wobble in 2005-6, which wen tbackward and forward (not a small side step or different-sized circle). Could that be "just" a movement backward? I'd say possibly, except I don't actually know if it would even be possble: these are massive forces of our, shall we say, gyroscopic Earth; something gripping it with a magnetic-cum-gravitic tug would maybe over a few months actually pull on it.

Then there's the bee-line of the North Magnetic Pole out of Canada quite rapidly.

Now, I know these things look like "mere lines" on paper: oh it moves this way or that ...

No. These are forces, and to find them not only acting in striking ways together, but also certain TYPES of things going seemingly weird in certain relationships to each other, this is what is odd.

This post is getting long. I'll stop here or we could talk all night of PX putative evidence and hypothetical interrelationships (... "hypothetical" here not meaning mere "notional" interrelationships, a "lark", but meaning "suppositional interrelationships, which we must look at for the purpose of seeing the argument through fully and fairly").

Good night Me, now. :) I gotta go soon. If you post again I'll try to reply, but I'm not sure how much longer I'll be around tonight. You? How long are you gonna be on?

And do you receive a notice if I reply? Or have you been diligently checking back all this time, like me?

:)