Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,695 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 64,485
Pageviews Today: 97,557Threads Today: 14Posts Today: 501
12:58 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Why no "Sir Ringo"?

 
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 01:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

*sigh* Then your communication skills have been found lacking. By addressing the topic previously rather than simply stating this has nothing to do with "what the queen told you", you failed. Again, you are merely a drama queen that cares more about "pages" than informing your fellow man. Sad, very sad...

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 967335


One thing you must understand about the Queen is that She is more powerful than what most people even conceive of to be possible. Do you think the only way She can communicate is to ring someone on the phone and say, "Weeeellll. Good to speak with you Guvner. Here is the reason why keep Ringo out." She is the most powerful person in the world. Just look at the coins. They tell you the story.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967335
United States
05/19/2010 01:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967335
United States
05/19/2010 01:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

*sigh* Then your communication skills have been found lacking. By addressing the topic previously rather than simply stating this has nothing to do with "what the queen told you", you failed. Again, you are merely a drama queen that cares more about "pages" than informing your fellow man. Sad, very sad...

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)



One thing you must understand about the Queen is that She is more powerful than what most people even conceive of to be possible. Do you think the only way She can communicate is to ring someone on the phone and say, "Weeeellll. Good to speak with you Guvner. Here is the reason why keep Ringo out." She is the most powerful person in the world. Just look at the coins. They tell you the story.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


I must understand nothing. You started this thread. You act as if you possess knowledge that others do not and should. Again, share or begone...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 01:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 967335


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967335
United States
05/19/2010 01:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 01:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 967335


Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967335
United States
05/19/2010 01:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad


Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


I recommend you go back to your "coffee cream" and "phat chix" threads... they were at least entertaining. Goodnight wannabe....
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 01:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad


Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.


I recommend you go back to your "coffee cream" and "phat chix" threads... they were at least entertaining. Goodnight wannabe....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 967335


Ah a fan. hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967335
United States
05/19/2010 01:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad


Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.


I recommend you go back to your "coffee cream" and "phat chix" threads... they were at least entertaining. Goodnight wannabe....


Ah a fan. hf
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


No, just wanted to confirm you are the idiot I thought you were... and I was correct. Good luck stinging the masses along for as long as you can...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 01:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
The funny thing is that though it runs deep it is not complex.
It is a purposeful denial by the Queen.
Ringo is desperate to be accepted.

This showed itself as he took the other Beatles shit.
What else was he going to do?
He was riding on them.

Think 'spies' and 'communism'.
Think 'international conspiracy'.

Really it comes down to one thing.
The Queen told me.

(In strange and wondrous ways).
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 01:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad


Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.


I recommend you go back to your "coffee cream" and "phat chix" threads... they were at least entertaining. Goodnight wannabe....


Ah a fan. hf


No, just wanted to confirm you are the idiot I thought you were... and I was correct. Good luck stinging the masses along for as long as you can...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 967335


Yes, you can recount enough that although ye present as negative you are a fan. There is no stringing along going on. You have not discovered anything. In fact you are a damn fool!

Cannot one and the same poster drink old milk, think fat chicks should lose weight, and know a thing or two about the Beatles? Geez you are an asshole.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 890684
United States
05/19/2010 01:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Perhaps Pete was one of the rare few who are not programmable? An MK Ultra drop-out?

Because George Martin and Epstein blamed the "lads" for wanting Best out, this smells of something isn't quite right.

The "Pete was cuter than the rest of the boys" theory, the "he's a loner" theory and "he won't take drugs with the rest of us" don't quite fit either when you see to what lengths TPTB went to to cover-up Paul's death with the extended trip to India and lots of facial hair for all to give the Faul's plastic surgery time to "set" ... (link to Faul photos: [link to digilander.libero.it]

Some say Pete Best's super curly hair wouldn't lend itself to the mop-top look.

Link to a photo:

Here is what Pete himself says:

"They've never stuck to one particular, logical reason," Best said, in a 2005 interview. "First of all, I was a crap drummer. Then they said I'd left the band. Then I was anti-social. Then, Brian was inhibited. Then, you get George turning around and saying I was becoming unreliable. We played 1,000 gigs, and I missed four ... So, controversy arises, doesn't it?"

Source: [link to www.petebest.net]

[link to scoop.diamondgalleries.com]

link to possible theories:

[link to www.petebest.net]

5. He rejected a romantic pass from Epstein, who was gay.

Conspiracy page:

Forget the JFK assassination; the firing of Pete Best is the conspiracy of the decade. Who within the Beatles' camp shit-canned the drummer, and for what reason? Sure, in the summer of 1962, manager Brian Epstein was the one who informed the poor bastard, but he was just the messenger.

Was it producer George Martin, because he thought Best's drumming weak? Was it John, Paul, and George, because Best refused to put down the Brylcreem and replace his pompadour with a mop-top? Or did the Fab Three ax Best because girls preferred his rocker looks?

That last theory has some legs: Best's mother, Mona, provided an incubator for the Beatles when she opened the Casbah Club in the family's Liverpool basement. Her son became the band's drummer in 1960, and according to Spencer Leigh's 1998 book Drummed Out!: The Sacking of Pete Best, the handsome Brit got more girls screaming and leaping at him than the others ever did.

Now think about this: Was it mere coincidence that the Beatles' next drummer, Ringo, was one of the homeliest on the Merseybeat scene?

To this day, Best claims he has no idea why he got canned. But one of rock's bad-luck stories turned golden in 1995, when Best received an undisclosed sum of money for the Beatles' Anthology 1, which included tracks featuring his drumming.

After the Beatles, Best kept on Merseybeatin' with the Pete Best Combo, but quit music in 1968. Exactly 20 years later, he broke his long-held silence with a memoir and put a band together that claims to capture the sound of the Casbah. Best has been touring ever since.

Source: [link to www.clevescene.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 967335
United States
05/19/2010 01:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
...it is up to you to state what you know...


Perhaps it is being stated in a way beyond your preconceptions.

Bowie = Queer
McCartney = Sir
Mick = Sir
Elton = Sir/Angel

Ringo = ?


McCartney = rumored to have slept with men
Mick = rumored to have slept with men
Elton = Queer, no rumor

Now, what is your point regarding queers and not being knighted? You are tiresome...


It wasn't my point. Never was. Someone else brought up Bowie. I was just clarifying his Queerdom. This has NOTHING to do with Ringo or anything I care to speak of further.

Now there is a reason why Ringo isn't Knighted.
The Queen told me.

(It has nothing to do with the 'backbeat' or Abby Road)


By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....


I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....


Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad


Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.


I recommend you go back to your "coffee cream" and "phat chix" threads... they were at least entertaining. Goodnight wannabe....


Ah a fan. hf


No, just wanted to confirm you are the idiot I thought you were... and I was correct. Good luck stinging the masses along for as long as you can...


Yes, you can recount enough that although ye present as negative you are a fan. There is no stringing along going on. You have not discovered anything. In fact you are a damn fool!

Cannot one and the same poster drink old milk, think fat chicks should lose weight, and know a thing or two about the Beatles? Geez you are an asshole.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


No sorry, the only assholes present are the ones that spell fat chicks as "phat chix" in their thread... losers that need attention will always continue to try to find a way to get more attention... yet continue to fail. I have kept your thread alive single-handedly, and you are welcome. Goodbye and good luck, you will need it I believe...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 950559
Australia
05/19/2010 02:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Yawn...what a bore you are OP. Goodnight.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 942514
United States
05/19/2010 02:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Who gives a fuck about any of the Beatles. They're all going to be rotting limey corpses and Keith Richards will still be cranking out shit at 90 that rocks harder than all but the Cavern Club era fab 4.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 300884
Sweden
05/19/2010 03:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
I'm interested in the topic, but I do not have time for silly games. I'll bookmark the thread and come back later to see if any beans have been spilled by the OP or not.
Frigg Stuyvesant

User ID: 621289
United States
05/19/2010 03:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
He pissed in an ashtray in the halls of Buckingham palace...






......I made that up.
Cui Bono?
Richard Eldritch

User ID: 974924
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 03:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Did Ringo Kiss and Tell?
HUSSAR!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974945
United States
05/19/2010 04:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
I thought it was because he was a jew
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 687593
Sweden
05/19/2010 04:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
A drummer can never be knighted, didn't you know that?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974954
Australia
05/19/2010 04:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
maybe hes not a mason
Richard Eldritch

User ID: 974924
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 04:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
maybe hes not a mason
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974954

Masan, Moran ;)
HUSSAR!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 869693
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 05:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Ringo is a Zionist Entity.

damned
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 802808
United States
05/19/2010 09:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
I thought it was because he was a jew
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974945


applause2 whip
Richard Eldritch

User ID: 974924
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 09:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
I thought it was because he was a jew


applause2 whip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808

Lots of Jews get knighted. Can't be that.
HUSSAR!
Lord Triesmann
User ID: 187194
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 09:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Sir Alan Sugar, for one.
Richard Eldritch

User ID: 974924
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
Sir Alan Sugar, for one.
 Quoting: Lord Triesmann 187194

YOU! YOU FUCKING TRAITOR ( football joke for our American slaves,er..I mean Fiends)

and Sir Phillip Green is another.
Jews are great brits.I like 'em.
HUSSAR!
Celtic (woad-man)

User ID: 961113
United Kingdom
05/19/2010 09:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
One thing you must understand about the Queen is that She is more powerful than what most people even conceive of to be possible. Do you think the only way She can communicate is to ring someone on the phone and say, "Weeeellll. Good to speak with you Guvner. Here is the reason why keep Ringo out." She is the most powerful person in the world. Just look at the coins. They tell you the story.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 802808


I dunno about the whole Ringo thing, but I wish more people in the U.K. considered your above statement plausible

Last Edited by CelticLegends on 05/19/2010 09:45 AM
It is the Thunderbolt that steers the Universe
- Heraclitus
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 937357
Canada
05/19/2010 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
I think Paul would become a mason and Ringo did not want to - final answer.LOL
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 968278
Canada
05/19/2010 07:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Why no "Sir Ringo"?
I'm thinking of the amount of foreign exchange that was brought into England through royalties from McCartney, Jagger and Elton John might have something to do with the knighthoods. Thank you for the 100's of millions we've earned in taxes... say, let me touch your shoulder with a sword, it's the least I could do. Plant might get one once Page dies... no way the Queen will knight Jimmy, two Led Wallets on the island is one too many.

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob