Why no "Sir Ringo"?

One thing you must understand about the Queen is that She is more powerful than what most people even conceive of to be possible. Do you think the only way She can communicate is to ring someone on the phone and say, "Weeeellll. Good to speak with you Guvner. Here is the reason why keep Ringo out." She is the most powerful person in the world. Just look at the coins. They tell you the story.

By addressing the issue rather than merely stating that homosexuality has nothing to do with it, you invited discussion of the topic. You responded regarding the sexuality of those mentioned, so it was a point of yours... your communication skills have been found lacking. Now, if you are not merely a drama queen as I believe you are, then state what you know or begone....

I must understand nothing. You started this thread. You act as if you possess knowledge that others do not and should. Again, share or begone...

I simply responded....well whatever.

How could a dog like Ringo get in movies?

Tell is a talent and he vowed to represent the kingdom.
John would have never done it, but Paul has a desire to be upper class.

What they did to Pete Best is unbelievable.
If it wasn't for that Epstein....

Tell? Who are you discussing here?

You knew John Lennon, personally?

What does any of this have to do with "Why no "Sir Ringo"?" No answers mean no knowledge... sad, so sad

Tell=Paul

It all has a lot to do with "Why no 'Sir Ringo'"?
The pieces will start fitting together.

I recommend you go back to your "coffee cream" and "phat chix" threads... they were at least entertaining. Goodnight wannabe....

Ah a fan.

No, just wanted to confirm you are the idiot I thought you were... and I was correct. Good luck stinging the masses along for as long as you can...

The funny thing is that though it runs deep it is not complex.
It is a purposeful denial by the Queen.
Ringo is desperate to be accepted.

This showed itself as he took the other Beatles shit.
What else was he going to do?
He was riding on them.

Think 'spies' and 'communism'.
Think 'international conspiracy'.

Really it comes down to one thing.
The Queen told me.

(In strange and wondrous ways).

Yes, you can recount enough that although ye present as negative you are a fan. There is no stringing along going on. You have not discovered anything. In fact you are a damn fool!

Cannot one and the same poster drink old milk, think fat chicks should lose weight, and know a thing or two about the Beatles? Geez you are an asshole.

Perhaps Pete was one of the rare few who are not programmable? An MK Ultra drop-out?

Because George Martin and Epstein blamed the "lads" for wanting Best out, this smells of something isn't quite right.

The "Pete was cuter than the rest of the boys" theory, the "he's a loner" theory and "he won't take drugs with the rest of us" don't quite fit either when you see to what lengths TPTB went to to cover-up Paul's death with the extended trip to India and lots of facial hair for all to give the Faul's plastic surgery time to "set" ... (link to Faul photos: [link to digilander.libero.it]

Some say Pete Best's super curly hair wouldn't lend itself to the mop-top look.

Link to a photo:

Here is what Pete himself says:

"They've never stuck to one particular, logical reason," Best said, in a 2005 interview. "First of all, I was a crap drummer. Then they said I'd left the band. Then I was anti-social. Then, Brian was inhibited. Then, you get George turning around and saying I was becoming unreliable. We played 1,000 gigs, and I missed four ... So, controversy arises, doesn't it?"

Source: [link to www.petebest.net]

[link to scoop.diamondgalleries.com]

link to possible theories:

[link to www.petebest.net]

5. He rejected a romantic pass from Epstein, who was gay.

Conspiracy page:

Forget the JFK assassination; the firing of Pete Best is the conspiracy of the decade. Who within the Beatles' camp shit-canned the drummer, and for what reason? Sure, in the summer of 1962, manager Brian Epstein was the one who informed the poor bastard, but he was just the messenger.

Was it producer George Martin, because he thought Best's drumming weak? Was it John, Paul, and George, because Best refused to put down the Brylcreem and replace his pompadour with a mop-top? Or did the Fab Three ax Best because girls preferred his rocker looks?

That last theory has some legs: Best's mother, Mona, provided an incubator for the Beatles when she opened the Casbah Club in the family's Liverpool basement. Her son became the band's drummer in 1960, and according to Spencer Leigh's 1998 book Drummed Out!: The Sacking of Pete Best, the handsome Brit got more girls screaming and leaping at him than the others ever did.

Now think about this: Was it mere coincidence that the Beatles' next drummer, Ringo, was one of the homeliest on the Merseybeat scene?

To this day, Best claims he has no idea why he got canned. But one of rock's bad-luck stories turned golden in 1995, when Best received an undisclosed sum of money for the Beatles' Anthology 1, which included tracks featuring his drumming.

After the Beatles, Best kept on Merseybeatin' with the Pete Best Combo, but quit music in 1968. Exactly 20 years later, he broke his long-held silence with a memoir and put a band together that claims to capture the sound of the Casbah. Best has been touring ever since.

Source: [link to www.clevescene.com]

No sorry, the only assholes present are the ones that spell fat chicks as "phat chix" in their thread... losers that need attention will always continue to try to find a way to get more attention... yet continue to fail. I have kept your thread alive single-handedly, and you are welcome. Goodbye and good luck, you will need it I believe...

Yawn...what a bore you are OP. Goodnight.

Who gives a fuck about any of the Beatles. They're all going to be rotting limey corpses and Keith Richards will still be cranking out shit at 90 that rocks harder than all but the Cavern Club era fab 4.

I'm interested in the topic, but I do not have time for silly games. I'll bookmark the thread and come back later to see if any beans have been spilled by the OP or not.

He pissed in an ashtray in the halls of Buckingham palace...






......I made that up.

Did Ringo Kiss and Tell?

I thought it was because he was a jew

A drummer can never be knighted, didn't you know that?

maybe hes not a mason

Masan, Moran ;)

Ringo is a Zionist Entity.

Lots of Jews get knighted. Can't be that.

Sir Alan Sugar, for one.

YOU! YOU FUCKING TRAITOR ( football joke for our American slaves,er..I mean Fiends)

and Sir Phillip Green is another.
Jews are great brits.I like 'em.

I dunno about the whole Ringo thing, but I wish more people in the U.K. considered your above statement plausible

Last Edited by CelticLegends on 05/19/2010 09:45 AM

I think Paul would become a mason and Ringo did not want to - final answer.LOL

I'm thinking of the amount of foreign exchange that was brought into England through royalties from McCartney, Jagger and Elton John might have something to do with the knighthoods. Thank you for the 100's of millions we've earned in taxes... say, let me touch your shoulder with a sword, it's the least I could do. Plant might get one once Page dies... no way the Queen will knight Jimmy, two Led Wallets on the island is one too many.