Do you believe this?! The UNSC just sided with Israel!!!!! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 988774 Slovakia 06/01/2010 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 988203 United States 06/01/2010 01:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomind User ID: 904314 Canada 06/01/2010 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well the quote you posted doesn't support the claim your thread title made.. how about posting more specific details? My Interesting Karma messages: - "You are an idiot. This post proves it." -"GLP MEMBERS BEWARE!!! THIS IS A GOVERNMENT SHILL." - Most moranic one given to me: When you type ".." you need to put three dots instead of two. Thread: Nibiru, or how to appear like you know what you are talking about |
It has only just begun User ID: 977776 United States 06/01/2010 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
UNThredded User ID: 989055 United States 06/01/2010 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is their statement: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717575“The Security Council deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries resulting from the use of force during the Israeli military operationin international waters against the convoy sailing to Gaza,” holy smokes! they are effectively recognizing Israeli's military operation in international waters as legit and are also infering that the convoy was going to breach the blockade. Thsi would mean that Israel was within legal means to intervene in international waters; in international law, if there appears to be a plan to breach a blockade then the state enforcing the blockade can interdict even outside its jurisdiction. This sucks royally. Where in the hell do you get legit from? I am pro-Israel, but Try posting the whole text next time as they openly condemn the attack... As it continues... The Council, in this context, condemns those acts which resulted in the loss of at least ten civilians and many wounded, and expresses its condolences to their families. Quoting: UNThe Security Council requests the immediate release of the ships as well as the civilians held by Israel. The Council urges Israel to permit full consular access, to allow the countries concerned to retrieve their deceased and wounded immediately, and to ensure the delivery of humanitarian assistance from the convoy to its destination. The Security Council takes note of the statement of the UN Secretary-General on the need to have a full investigation into the matter and it calls for a prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation conforming to international standards. The Security Council stresses that the situation in Gaza is not sustainable. The Council re-emphasizes the importance of the full implementation of Resolutions 1850 and 1860. In that context, it reiterates its grave concern at the humanitarian situation in Gaza and stresses the need for sustained and regular flow of goods and people to Gaza as well as unimpeded provision and distribution of humanitarian assistance throughout Gaza. The Security Council underscores that the only viable solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an agreement negotiated between the parties and re-emphasises that only a two-State solution, with an independent and viable Palestinian State living side by side in peace and security with Israel and its other neighbours, could bring peace to the region. The Security Council expresses support for the proximity talks and voices concern that this incident took place while the proximity talks are underway and urges the parties to act with restraint, avoiding any unilateral and provocative actions, and all international partners to promote an atmosphere of cooperation between the parties and throughout the region. -Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty~Thomas Jefferson -Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe – Noah Webster |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 717575 United States 06/01/2010 02:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well the quote you posted doesn't support the claim your thread title made.. how about posting more specific details? Quoting: nomind |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 717575 United States 06/01/2010 02:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What are you? some idiot with poor reading comprehension? "condemns those acts which resulted in the loss of at least ten civilians..." The UNSC is not condemning the military operation!!!!!!!!! they are only condemning the acts which resulted in loss of life. Anyone would condemn an act that results in loss of life! But they are not condemining the military operation and that is the crux of this whole thing! if they do not condemn the operation than there is no illegal issue here. Here is their statement: Quoting: UNThredded“The Security Council deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries resulting from the use of force during the Israeli military operationin international waters against the convoy sailing to Gaza,” holy smokes! they are effectively recognizing Israeli's military operation in international waters as legit and are also infering that the convoy was going to breach the blockade. Thsi would mean that Israel was within legal means to intervene in international waters; in international law, if there appears to be a plan to breach a blockade then the state enforcing the blockade can interdict even outside its jurisdiction. This sucks royally. Where in the hell do you get legit from? I am pro-Israel, but Try posting the whole text next time as they openly condemn the attack... As it continues... The Council, in this context, condemns those acts which resulted in the loss of at least ten civilians and many wounded, and expresses its condolences to their families. The Security Council requests the immediate release of the ships as well as the civilians held by Israel. The Council urges Israel to permit full consular access, to allow the countries concerned to retrieve their deceased and wounded immediately, and to ensure the delivery of humanitarian assistance from the convoy to its destination. The Security Council takes note of the statement of the UN Secretary-General on the need to have a full investigation into the matter and it calls for a prompt, impartial, credible and transparent investigation conforming to international standards. The Security Council stresses that the situation in Gaza is not sustainable. The Council re-emphasizes the importance of the full implementation of Resolutions 1850 and 1860. In that context, it reiterates its grave concern at the humanitarian situation in Gaza and stresses the need for sustained and regular flow of goods and people to Gaza as well as unimpeded provision and distribution of humanitarian assistance throughout Gaza. The Security Council underscores that the only viable solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an agreement negotiated between the parties and re-emphasises that only a two-State solution, with an independent and viable Palestinian State living side by side in peace and security with Israel and its other neighbours, could bring peace to the region. The Security Council expresses support for the proximity talks and voices concern that this incident took place while the proximity talks are underway and urges the parties to act with restraint, avoiding any unilateral and provocative actions, and all international partners to promote an atmosphere of cooperation between the parties and throughout the region. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 865792 United States 06/01/2010 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 974386 United States 06/01/2010 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 985286 United States 06/01/2010 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomind User ID: 904314 Canada 06/01/2010 02:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You obviously have never taken up a course in critical reading. I suggest you read the quote again, critically. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717575Well the quote you posted doesn't support the claim your thread title made.. how about posting more specific details? Actually it's more of a case of my reading the whole article, and analyzing what it is saying for myself, instead of just quickly scanning it for any lines that seem to support my point of view, then posting it and acting surprised and aggressive when it's pointed out that the article in question actually proposes a point that is the complete opposite of the one you are posting about. Thanks for playing! My Interesting Karma messages: - "You are an idiot. This post proves it." -"GLP MEMBERS BEWARE!!! THIS IS A GOVERNMENT SHILL." - Most moranic one given to me: When you type ".." you need to put three dots instead of two. Thread: Nibiru, or how to appear like you know what you are talking about |
UNThredded User ID: 989055 United States 06/01/2010 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What are you? some idiot with poor reading comprehension? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717575"condemns those acts which resulted in the loss of at least ten civilians..." The UNSC is not condemning the military operation!!!!!!!!! they are only condemning the acts which resulted in loss of life. Anyone would condemn an act that results in loss of life! But they are not condemining the military operation and that is the crux of this whole thing! if they do not condemn the operation than there is no illegal issue here. What are you, some that expects people to know what is going on inside your hop clogged mind Big doofus, you should have elaborated that in the OP since you are going into deep textual content analysis... -Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty~Thomas Jefferson -Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe – Noah Webster |
ANNONYMOUS User ID: 825313 United States 06/01/2010 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is their statement: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717575“The Security Council deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries resulting from the use of force during the Israeli military operationin international waters against the convoy sailing to Gaza,” holy smokes! they are effectively recognizing Israeli's military operation in international waters as legit and are also infering that the convoy was going to breach the blockade. Thsi would mean that Israel was within legal means to intervene in international waters; in international law, if there appears to be a plan to breach a blockade then the state enforcing the blockade can interdict even outside its jurisdiction. This sucks royally. Why does it suck royally OP just because you don't agree with it? Are you a Maritime or International Lawyer? Infact do you have any legal training at all? While I rarely agree with the United Ninnies on anything they at least here are following established law and precident a new first for them in my opinion. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 717575 United States 06/01/2010 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well... sorry for being overly intelligent ;-) What are you? some idiot with poor reading comprehension? Quoting: UNThredded"condemns those acts which resulted in the loss of at least ten civilians..." The UNSC is not condemning the military operation!!!!!!!!! they are only condemning the acts which resulted in loss of life. Anyone would condemn an act that results in loss of life! But they are not condemining the military operation and that is the crux of this whole thing! if they do not condemn the operation than there is no illegal issue here. What are you, some that expects people to know what is going on inside your hop clogged mind Big doofus, you should have elaborated that in the OP since you are going into deep textual content analysis... :gabm: |