GOVERNMENT TAKE OVER OF THE INTERNET BEING FAST TRACKED!! | |
| 89446 User ID: 925714 06/18/2010 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Barack Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein wants all "conspiracy theories" banned. Quoting: FactCheckNot only is that a direct attack on human rights, journalists, news companies and freedom in all areas of life but it is truly a idiotic statement to make. No, THIS IS.... ZioNWO! *kicks you in the pit* Sol Dominvs Imperi Romani Imperium Romanum Sacrum In Varietate Concordia |
| Kat Mama User ID: 969040 06/18/2010 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are biting off more than they can chew. You know what happens...you choke. Quoting: Johnny RingoI hope you're right 'cuz this sucks. With all these bills they're rushing thru, tho, it does seems as if they're running scared. They know there's a growing tidal wave of us against them and they're scared shitless 'cuz there's more of us and they can't hide the truth as long as the internet exists. My guess is that even if they did pass this ridiculous bill that someone - a lot of someones - would find ways around it. So - they may try to run but they cannot hide. And we know where they all live......... CONDEMNATION without INVESTIGATION is the HIGHEST form of IGNORANCE |
| MotherGoose User ID: 977940 06/18/2010 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| FactCheck (OP) User ID: 964147 06/18/2010 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Barack Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein wants all "conspiracy theories" banned. Quoting: 89446Not only is that a direct attack on human rights, journalists, news companies and freedom in all areas of life but it is truly a idiotic statement to make. No, THIS IS.... ZioNWO! *kicks you in the pit* Thread: EPA conclusion...cap and trade is affordable |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 869225 06/18/2010 02:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1004342 06/18/2010 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1004342 06/18/2010 02:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 998755 06/18/2010 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bill only moves FEDERAL CIVILIAN NETWORKS (i.e. government owned networks that are not used for military purposes) control from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This is not proposed as a government take over of PRIVATE networks. I wish people would learn to read and comprehend before drinking the koolaid. Don't believe me? Fucking read the bill and have an intelligent debate. ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 930979 06/18/2010 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This makes perfect sense... the government sees the impending collapse of the dollar and the US bankruptcy and knows the citizens will be leveraging the communication via the internet for the coming revolution... they think if they shut down the internet they can protect their power... granted it will certainly delay their coming but it will come regardless... |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 869225 06/18/2010 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| FactCheck (OP) User ID: 964147 06/18/2010 02:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bill only moves FEDERAL CIVILIAN NETWORKS (i.e. government owned networks that are not used for military purposes) control from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998755This is not proposed as a government take over of PRIVATE networks. I wish people would learn to read and comprehend before drinking the koolaid. Don't believe me? Fucking read the bill and have an intelligent debate. there are 40+ bills..which one are you talking about exactly? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 969642 06/18/2010 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1007594 06/18/2010 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 998755 06/18/2010 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1006389 06/18/2010 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Too many people are awakening so to speak so they are just introducting another way to control the information. It was easy before the internet, they controlled all MSM and what everyone had access to. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 910135Might be time to invest in a short-wave radio, just in case... better than nothing... THAT is what I was looking for. How DO we circumvent this or work around it, to keep information flowing as much as possible? Had a freaky dream along these lines a long time ago. Never had context until recently. But, here in waking life, what are real possibilities???? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 831138 06/18/2010 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wish people would learn to read and comprehend before drinking the koolaid. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998755Don't believe me? Fucking read the bill and have an intelligent debate. ...and the Patriot Act was ONLY to be used against rag-heads and terr'ists, NEVER against Americans, right ?? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1006389 06/18/2010 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This bill only moves FEDERAL CIVILIAN NETWORKS (i.e. government owned networks that are not used for military purposes) control from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998755This is not proposed as a government take over of PRIVATE networks. I wish people would learn to read and comprehend before drinking the koolaid. Don't believe me? Fucking read the bill and have an intelligent debate. ![]() I could say that was insulting. Instead, I will ask: Spoonfeed us, then, since you know so much. Tell us what you want us to know. |
| FactCheck (OP) User ID: 964147 06/18/2010 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | there are 40+ bills..which one are you talking about exactly? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998755Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act of 2010, the one discussed in the Federal News Radio article to which you linked. so what about all the other bills huh? many bills linked on that site btw Last Edited by RTS on 06/18/2010 02:54 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 998755 06/18/2010 02:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Besides, don't you think free speech advocacy groups, large private network holders like AT&T, Comcast, and others would be a little upset if the government was trying to seize control of private citizens and corporations networks? Yet no press releases from them. Odd don't you think? It's because these cyber security bills are about securing government networks, both civilian and military. Yeah, some of them probably have some stupid wording in them, like the proposed "kill-switch" that made the news but was dropped when the law writers were told it'd be nigh impossible without a trillion dollar investment to change the fundamental nature of the internet. In government parlance, "civilian" means agencies like Social Security Administration. Non-military. "Private" means you and me. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 961340 06/18/2010 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Besides, don't you think free speech advocacy groups, large private network holders like AT&T, Comcast, and others would be a little upset if the government was trying to seize control of private citizens and corporations networks? Yet no press releases from them. Odd don't you think? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998755It's because these cyber security bills are about securing government networks, both civilian and military. Yeah, some of them probably have some stupid wording in them, like the proposed "kill-switch" that made the news but was dropped when the law writers were told it'd be nigh impossible without a trillion dollar investment to change the fundamental nature of the internet. In government parlance, "civilian" means agencies like Social Security Administration. Non-military. "Private" means you and me. Don't forget about "Right means Left" and "Up means Down". |
| FactCheck (OP) User ID: 964147 06/18/2010 03:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Besides, don't you think free speech advocacy groups, large private network holders like AT&T, Comcast, and others would be a little upset if the government was trying to seize control of private citizens and corporations networks? Yet no press releases from them. Odd don't you think? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998755It's because these cyber security bills are about securing government networks, both civilian and military. Yeah, some of them probably have some stupid wording in them, like the proposed "kill-switch" that made the news but was dropped when the law writers were told it'd be nigh impossible without a trillion dollar investment to change the fundamental nature of the internet. In government parlance, "civilian" means agencies like Social Security Administration. Non-military. "Private" means you and me. maybe because there is such a deluge of bills that nobody understands it all? why so many? Last Edited by RTS on 06/18/2010 03:02 PM |
| BobbleHead User ID: 902267 06/18/2010 03:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 910135 06/18/2010 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Too many people are awakening so to speak so they are just introducting another way to control the information. It was easy before the internet, they controlled all MSM and what everyone had access to. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 614955Might be time to invest in a short-wave radio, just in case... better than nothing... Lots of good choices. I've several for differing power choices. AND, please remember, Ignorance is bliss for TPTB. Can you elaborate? I know nothing about short-wave radio. I'm looking for something basic, portable, maybe runs on AA batteries? What do you suggest? |
| BobbleHead User ID: 902267 06/18/2010 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Too many people are awakening so to speak so they are just introducting another way to control the information. It was easy before the internet, they controlled all MSM and what everyone had access to. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 910135Might be time to invest in a short-wave radio, just in case... better than nothing... Lots of good choices. I've several for differing power choices. AND, please remember, Ignorance is bliss for TPTB. Can you elaborate? I know nothing about short-wave radio. I'm looking for something basic, portable, maybe runs on AA batteries? What do you suggest? Rather than a shortwave you should get a hand scanner, that way you get a choice of bands in case anyone is also broadcasting locally too on UHF\VHF or handheld radios. I've already got one. ICOM IC-R20 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 875736 06/18/2010 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 910135 06/18/2010 03:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Too many people are awakening so to speak so they are just introducting another way to control the information. It was easy before the internet, they controlled all MSM and what everyone had access to. Quoting: Anonymous 750018Might be time to invest in a short-wave radio, just in case... better than nothing... Ham radio is a really good back up for this kind of shit. You don't need a license just to listen; only to transmit. The license test for the 1st level is really easy and there's free internet study sites. 1st level license test costs $14.00 There are plenty of good used ham radios around, too. Can you elaborate as well? As with SW, I know nothing about ham either. I used to have a CB radio once upon a time, but that's about it. Which would be better, ham or SW? I'm just interested in listening at this point, should the SHTF and the internet gets cut off. Where would be a good source of used equipment? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 998755 06/18/2010 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | maybe because there is such a deluge of bills that nobody understands it all? why so many? Quoting: FactCheckI suspect it is politics as usual. A problem has been identified, publicized (this very topic was on 60 Minutes and 20/20 the last few weeks,) and now a power struggle to be the "one who saved the day" is underway. But please don't get me wrong. I commend your vigilance in the face of government tyranny. I was just lashing out at the herd mentality of all the people who were so willing to go along without reading or understanding what was being discussed. This bill is not reason to take to the streets. It just makes government bureaucrats report to a new douchebag in a different building. We need people to watch these jerks. Because if we don't, one day we will wake up and they will be at our doors, to take what is ours while we slept. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 875736 06/18/2010 03:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, why did you guys put a nazi dictator in power? Quoting: BobbleHead96% voting block of Im_an_idiots (mr bill, oh no oh no, we have to let him we have to let him or the Im_an_idiots will riot oooooooooooooooooooooooooh noooooooooooooooooooooooo |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 910135 06/18/2010 03:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Too many people are awakening so to speak so they are just introducting another way to control the information. It was easy before the internet, they controlled all MSM and what everyone had access to. Quoting: BobbleHeadMight be time to invest in a short-wave radio, just in case... better than nothing... Lots of good choices. I've several for differing power choices. AND, please remember, Ignorance is bliss for TPTB. Can you elaborate? I know nothing about short-wave radio. I'm looking for something basic, portable, maybe runs on AA batteries? What do you suggest? Rather than a shortwave you should get a hand scanner, that way you get a choice of bands in case anyone is also broadcasting locally too on UHF\VHF or handheld radios. I've already got one. ICOM IC-R20 Now one of those I DO have already... runs on AA's. I forget what brand it is- I think it's one of those Radio Shack brands- Realistic? My husband bought it quite a while ago. I would also like to have something like SW because it can pick up signals from much farther away. |
| FactCheck (OP) User ID: 964147 06/18/2010 03:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | hey you radio people... even the shill admitted the kill switch is a farce. ok? internet kill switch threads are here Thread: Internet Kill Switch Proposed in Senate Thread: Senators propose granting president emergency Internet power! KILL SWITCH?!? Thread: Obama internet 'kill switch' proposed Thread: Obama internet 'kill switch' proposed Last Edited by RTS on 06/18/2010 03:26 PM |