Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,615 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 22,574
Pageviews Today: 31,101Threads Today: 19Posts Today: 166
12:15 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars

 
rtruth
User ID: 999480
United States
06/19/2010 09:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Light speed is the speed limit IN THIS DIMENSION. FTL speed is possible but not while remaining in this dimension. You will go supraluminal and out of this dimension at the same time. Time, however, remains the same in the supraluminal dimensions...

Think this way: multidimensionality of the multiverse is the equivalent of time in a four-dimensional universe. Multidimensionality exists so that everything is not happening at the same space-time coordinate. This is why, in atoms, for example, most of the structure is EMPTY SPACE. It is not 'empty' but is filled with multiverse structure.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 797009

+1 im glad other people understand the multi-verse. But knowing all this makes me think God is very very mathematically possible now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
06/19/2010 10:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
It is the place value structure that is important....the values of said places are secondary....

Formulas that use the structure: 1 = 1 * 1 aren't in tune with the universe -- mathematically....



Wow that was really deep. I'm speechless. What about vectors and tensors? Can we use them or they aren't in tune with the Universe?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1008961


Those are time independant concepts....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1008854
India
06/20/2010 12:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump
~*~sang-froid~*~

User ID: 160874
Canada
06/20/2010 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Portugal, CAN YOU FUCKING STOP SPAMMING MY THREADS!
 Quoting: Sickscent


See...this is why I picked you for the end of the world LOL! Always so calm and so nice, then all of a sudden comments like ^ and "dont you have a fucking telescope to go look through"... lolsign
:gsfhibiscus: ...Where there's a Will...

"...go back to sleep you yellow bellied freaks, afraid of God AND Modern Science..." ~ Wintersleep ~
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1008854
India
06/20/2010 12:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Portugal, CAN YOU FUCKING STOP SPAMMING MY THREADS!


See...this is why I picked you for the end of the world LOL! Always so calm and so nice, then all of a sudden comments like ^ and "dont you have a fucking telescope to go look through"... lolsign
 Quoting: ~*~sang-froid~*~


chuckle
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 964953
United States
06/20/2010 04:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump
 Quoting: Sickscent


for a great article....

I will keep quiet.... afro
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1008854
India
06/20/2010 06:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump


for a great article....

I will keep quiet.... afro
 Quoting: Sugarelf

hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 920396
United States
06/20/2010 06:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Has anyone visited: [link to saturniancosmology.org] He talks about plasma streams between planets and Coronal Mass Ejections. The site seems to suggest more of an electrical predominance between planets than gravitational. It also goes into theories of plasma discharges that travel faster than the speed of light.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 860701
United Kingdom
06/20/2010 06:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Now this is what I call proper disclosure. Cheers, sick.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1008854
India
06/20/2010 07:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Now this is what I call proper disclosure. Cheers, sick.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 860701


I am working on it... Cheers
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
06/21/2010 08:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
06/21/2010 08:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
It does not ripple down the line because charged particles are bumping into each other, a process that is subject to Einstein's speed limit. Instead, an external controller drives the particles and can synchronize them to make a pulse pass through the wire at whatever speed you want. The particles are like dominos in a row. A causal process is the usual domino effect in which each domino knocks down the next; the dominos move at their own speed, determined by their size and spacing. An acausal process is if you knocked down all the dominos with your hand; the dominos move however fast you can make them.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
06/21/2010 08:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Whatever the origin of the pulse in a wire, it involves the motion of electric charge and emits electromagnetic radiation. The radiation propagates outward at the speed of light, but is forever shaped by the speed of whatever generated it. When Singleton, Schmidt, and the rest of their team generate slower-than-light pulses using their technique, the resulting radiation looks just like the radiation created by ordinary causal pulses. For faster-than-light pulses, the radiation looks just like the radiation that would be created if charged particles really could exceed the speed of light.

Which is to say, it looks pretty weird.
aether
User ID: 1028612
United Kingdom
07/08/2010 10:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
It does not ripple down the line because charged particles are bumping into each other, a process that is subject to Einstein's speed limit. Instead, an external controller drives the particles and can synchronize them to make a pulse pass through the wire at whatever speed you want. The particles are like dominos in a row. A causal process is the usual domino effect in which each domino knocks down the next; the dominos move at their own speed, determined by their size and spacing. An acausal process is if you knocked down all the dominos with your hand; the dominos move however fast you can make them.
 Quoting: Sickscent


taking sickscents visuals and scaling up....

Another serious problem faced by conventional thinking is that the quantum shifts seem to occur galaxy-wide without delay. No object has been found with two different redshifts. Yet a change propagating at the speed of light would take something like 100,000 years to traverse a galaxy. It seems that the kind of particle dipole distortions that create inertial mass and gravity propagate at the near infinite speed of the electrostatic force. So, once begun, the quantum shift in atomic orbitals could spread across a galaxy in less than a second. I suppose it could be termed “galactic quantum entanglement.”
 Quoting: Science


The Remarkable Slowness of Light
[link to www.holoscience.com]

It seems the electrostatic force speed compared to light speed is the difference between one second and 100,000 years

The particles are like dominos in a row. A causal process is the usual domino effect in which each domino knocks down the next; the dominos move at their own speed, determined by their size and spacing.

....the particles are already in place (exist) within touching distance of each other....

..there is no void/place without the particles existance within it....

...the particles are invisible (field)...

..a cause(input of information/force) effects all of the particles at once because of the structure and function of the field compising of the particles....

...taking this one step further...

What is an Aether Particle

Aether is a rotating magnetic field with a quantum spin of 2, no particles are to be found.

Aether will encapsulate angular momentum, and produce matter, that has a quantum interger spin of 1/2.

Angular momentum is not a particle, neither is it's encapsulation by the RMF into matter, a particle creation.

There is no wave, no particle, just distributed charge.

Therefore it can appear as either, but it is neither.

The RMF carries a distributed Electrostatic Charge, you cannot have one without the other.

This causes all sub atomic charges to have the same ES charge, but this is not the same realtionship as EM charge.

EM Charge is directly proportional to the mass of the particle....ie EM Charge is the distribued view of linear mass.

So EM quantum charge varies by mass, and ES quantum charge is universal to all sub atomic units.

All structural relationships are a spirograph relationship...1/2 spin angular momentum within a aether 2 spin RMF....PHI ensues at the second pass....and hence PHI is in all forms.
 Quoting: Science


....we are now within sickscent`s the politcs of god thread



cool2
aether
User ID: 1028612
United Kingdom
07/08/2010 10:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
god gets bigger....

1929 - The American astronomer Hubble established that some nebulae (fuzzy patches of light on the night sky) were indeed distant galaxies comparable in size to our own Milky Way.

in 2002 god become. .

The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) site estimates there are hundreds of billions of galaxies in the universe. A recent German super-computer simulation estimates that the number may be as high as 500 billion!

in 2010 god became....

Universe may have billions more stars
Astronomers have underestimated the number of galaxies in parts of the Universe by as much as 90 per cent, according to a study, suggesting billions of stars are yet to be recorded.
 Quoting: aether


our universe by it`s structure communicates/interacts (functions) at infinite (instant) velocity..

..actual velocity is dependent upon the input information/force (pulse) it receives....

electrostatic charge with it`s accompanying magnetic rotating field within a human structure functions as what humankind terms consciousness

this is why non local consciousness and humankind consciousness have so much in common

same field functioning within a different structure


Has science found God in non local reality?
[link to www.plim.org]

...the politics of god... rockon
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 961432
United States
07/08/2010 10:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Nice post OP. I still think that the "constant" speed of light is directly related to the mechanism used to measure the speed of light. New methods of measurement seeking to reach other conclusions may very well yield different results.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 985194
United States
07/08/2010 10:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
The new paradigm is cracking through into science...

(<80%)

[link to www.scientificamerican.com]
...And what I've found is utterly fascinating.

Singleton says the basic principle of FTL currents goes back to work by English physicist Oliver Heaviside and German physicist Arnold Sommerfeldt in the 1890s, but was forgotten because Einstein's theories dissuaded physicists from thinking about FTL phenomena, even those that evaded the theories' strictures. I've only just touched on this engrossing physics and I recommend you read the team's papers, beginning with this one. "People just don't think about things moving faster than the speed of light," Singleton says. "This is a completely wide open and unexplored field."

 Quoting: Sickscent


Sickscent, I have created (once again) a new thread discussing the societal adaptions needed for future human existence (within the next one-hundred years).

Please take a look at the newest thread for the same information seen before, yet organized entirely better.

Thread: Global Stratification: An Inside Look at the Sociological Structure of Human Civilization on Earth

I also discuss how we must immediately change the use of the internet when possible. We use it too often for such futile things (myspace, facebook, "funny videos", etcetera) and while some of those things are quite entertaining; we have a serious tool we can use to shape the future -- we should use it wisely.

God Like Productions might be a lunacy forum of all sorts of conspiracy and nonsense...but what it boils down to is a tool used for some to communicate. There are a lot of people with similar thinking patterns that lurk the forums, sitting ever so quietly.

So I ask, for those that enjoy the "big topics" and want to skip the "small stuff", check out the thread. It's about real shit that concerns humanity and the future.

Thanks for reading.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 985194
United States
07/08/2010 11:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
The new paradigm is cracking through into science...

(<80%)

[link to www.scientificamerican.com]
...And what I've found is utterly fascinating.

Singleton says the basic principle of FTL currents goes back to work by English physicist Oliver Heaviside and German physicist Arnold Sommerfeldt in the 1890s, but was forgotten because Einstein's theories dissuaded physicists from thinking about FTL phenomena, even those that evaded the theories' strictures. I've only just touched on this engrossing physics and I recommend you read the team's papers, beginning with this one. "People just don't think about things moving faster than the speed of light," Singleton says. "This is a completely wide open and unexplored field."



Sickscent, I have created (once again) a new thread discussing the societal adaptions needed for future human existence (within the next one-hundred years).

Please take a look at the newest thread for the same information seen before, yet organized entirely better.

Thread: Global Stratification: An Inside Look at the Sociological Structure of Human Civilization on Earth

I also discuss how we must immediately change the use of the internet when possible. We use it too often for such futile things (myspace, facebook, "funny videos", etcetera) and while some of those things are quite entertaining; we have a serious tool we can use to shape the future -- we should use it wisely.

God Like Productions might be a lunacy forum of all sorts of conspiracy and nonsense...but what it boils down to is a tool used for some to communicate. There are a lot of people with similar thinking patterns that lurk the forums, sitting ever so quietly.

So I ask, for those that enjoy the "big topics" and want to skip the "small stuff", check out the thread. It's about real shit that concerns humanity and the future.

Thanks for reading.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 985194


The relevance of my response to this topic is that much of our "fields of science" are "upgrading" to higher complexity. I include the science of sociology, the next paradigm should be a focus on macro.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

In the world of macrosociology, you find that every being on this planet (subscribed to first world tradition) has to stratify...or go through a set of trials and tribulations to reach an outcome.

For example, we go to school to get a degree (creditialism).

Once you have the credentials you can pick a career on the income hierarchy...they all differ in many ways.

In the long run, you spend your whole time being educated just to make paper-money. How absolutely fucking useless.

That does not benefit a damn thing.
aether
User ID: 1028612
United Kingdom
07/08/2010 01:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
electrostatic charge with it`s accompanying magnetic rotating field within a human structure functions as what humankind terms consciousness

this is why non local consciousness and humankind consciousness have so much in common

same field functioning within a different structure
 Quoting: aether


existing within and without all things and called consciouness when functioning within a human structure

it is attributed another name ....

consciousness is deemed intelligence

There is no wave, no particle, just distributed charge.

Therefore it can appear as either, but it is neither.
 Quoting: Science


the structure of the field functions as intelligence

the field makes descions/choices (intelligence) at the sub atomic level

it has a motive/purpose
thisgoodriddle
User ID: 1117755
Canada
10/02/2010 09:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Hm. Well, one of the unstated assumptions in this thread is that the universe/multiverse is real. That's not true. It/they is/are virtual reality/realities. In support of this claim, please see:

peaceWikipedia, overview
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Nick Bostrom, 2002
[link to www.simulation-argument.com]

Brian Whitworth, 2008
[link to aps.arxiv.org]

Craig Hogan, 2009
[link to www.sciencedaily.com]

Jong-Hwan Kim, Chi-Ho Lee, and Kang-Hee Lee, 2009
[link to www.physorg.com]

Nikodem Poplawski, 2010
[link to www.physorg.com]

Andrew Cleland, 2010
[link to www.foxnews.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/04/2011 12:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
:BRUMP:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 865798
United States
11/04/2011 03:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Hm. Well, one of the unstated assumptions in this thread is that the universe/multiverse is real. That's not true. It/they is/are virtual reality/realities. In support of this claim, please see:

peaceWikipedia, overview
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Nick Bostrom, 2002
[link to www.simulation-argument.com]

Brian Whitworth, 2008
[link to aps.arxiv.org]

Craig Hogan, 2009
[link to www.sciencedaily.com]

Jong-Hwan Kim, Chi-Ho Lee, and Kang-Hee Lee, 2009
[link to www.physorg.com]

Nikodem Poplawski, 2010
[link to www.physorg.com]

Andrew Cleland, 2010
[link to www.foxnews.com]
 Quoting: thisgoodriddle 1117755
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
11/06/2011 06:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
:BRUMP:
 Quoting: SickScent
:D
User ID: 1428896
United States
11/06/2011 06:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
11/06/2011 06:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump:kirk:bump



cool stuff, like always
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4793788
United Kingdom
11/06/2011 07:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Love how no one actually understood the article. Nothing is actually (causaly) travelling faster than the speed of light.

But it is interesting none the less. But not why you think it is. Note the article says that the electromagnetic waves propagate at the speed of light not faster!

OP seems amazed by acausal processes (they highlight this "the dominos move however fast you can make them. " as if it means something). Here is a good example of why it is not amazing. Take a laser. Now shine it a a (hypothetical wall) light years away. Now move the laser. Your small movements could cause the laser beam to travel ,much much faster than the speed of light across the walls surface. No magic is occurring here though. Relativity remains intact. Just as the article explains.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1511582
United States
11/06/2011 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
Love how no one actually understood the article. Nothing is actually (causaly) travelling faster than the speed of light.

But it is interesting none the less. But not why you think it is. Note the article says that the electromagnetic waves propagate at the speed of light not faster!

OP seems amazed by acausal processes (they highlight this "the dominos move however fast you can make them. " as if it means something). Here is a good example of why it is not amazing. Take a laser. Now shine it a a (hypothetical wall) light years away. Now move the laser. Your small movements could cause the laser beam to travel ,much much faster than the speed of light across the walls surface. No magic is occurring here though. Relativity remains intact. Just as the article explains.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4793788


Yes, and that is why the scientists are excited about the finding...because you think it is not amazing.

pick
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1297814
Germany
11/07/2011 08:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
could be int for ya...


Physicists scrutinize the universe with a novel camera


07.11.11 - For the first time, a telescope has been equipped with a camera based on a new technology that uses semiconductors. This instrument will observe the flashes of light that are produced by gamma rays when they penetrate the Earth’s atmosphere.


There are particle accelerators in the universe that are far more powerful than CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. Supermassive black holes in the centers of far-off galaxies and the remainders of exploded stars, for example, send various particles, known as cosmic rays, hurtling out into the universe. When these rays interact with interstellar space, they produce another kind of radiation, known as gamma rays...


ReadMore:
[link to actu.epfl.ch]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1403418
United States
01/29/2012 08:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9797286
United Kingdom
01/29/2012 08:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Faster-than-Light (Superluminal) Electric Currents could explain Pulsars
The pseed of light is correct in that the universe in regards to certain has a majority type quality. The majority of light travels at the speed of light. All light in the third dimension of reality. Einstein was correct but only in the 3rd dimension of reality..!

There is no movement in the third dimension of reality - in the universe the vortex is the shape and pattern and form of the FOURTH dimension of relaity - there are four states of elemental matter liquid solid gas and vortex..!

It is in the fourth dimension oand only due to VORTEX that anything moves at all...! Super acceleration is in the ofurth dimension of reality. Without the vortex there would be NO MOVEMENT.

The vortex moves everything in the universe and everything is because of the vortex, suns galaxies the whole kaboodle apart from cold..!

Life also moves and as such life exists in the ofurth dimension of reality you dont live in the third - a corpse is an example of the 3rd dimension of relaity its is structure without energy or movement, like a candlestick or a rock.

The majority (note that the universe has such things as majority - all creation must therefore employ democracy a majority if you like - democarcy is a philosophical construct not a political one), without democracy there can be NO CREATION or in life terms no creativity.

The positive in the universe is all that moves, all that has moved and all that shall be moved...! The negative is cold ... cold absorbs energy and as such stops movement.

Inert cavity structure creates all vortexes in the universe... A vortex is a symbolic of infinite potential acceleration. The biger the vortex the more it can move and/or accelerate.

Nothing apart from life (life is a by product of universal proceses - you move your finger the energy came froma vortex some way down the line).

Einstein never accelerated througha vortex .. and as such with relativity you were trapped in the thrid dimensionm of reality in which you are already DEAD..!

The universe could NOT exist without super acceleration..! The universe and everything that it does is solely to move energy from one place to another it ahs to do this in some instances beyond the speed of lighjt as the cold absorbs and would erradicate the entire energy in the super cosmos.

They say that cold by absolute zero is a finite absolute ... there is no such thing in regards to cold .. it has the POTENTIAL for infinite reduction in temperature whereas of course there is a finite amount of energy and ammter in the super cosmos. wherte you get super acceleration you also get reduction in temperature this is the reason that the universe super accelerates as if it didnt the energy would be absorped by the cold.

Newton highlights that nothing can be created or destroyed - in a way he is correct however where you have an infinite amount of cold and a finite amount of energy that energy cannot possibly heat up the cold and take control if you like, so it has to pass through the cold but it has to do it very quickly.

seeing as life is a by product of universal processes we emmualte in everything we do thopse universal processes that created us OR WE SHOULD, so lets say there are two houses two miles apart and outside thoise houses there is a -50 degree centigrade temperature.

I am in one house and I have a younger person with me that has to deliver a message to the other house but they are wearing merely a a pair of traners and a vest and a pair of shorts. I ask the individual how are you going to get to the other house - there is only one correct answer 0 the individual replies correctly " i am going to get there as fast as I can"..! Correct...! WHY...?

Of course if the individual dies on route his or her energy would be absorped by the surrounding ice and cold, however the ice and cold would not raise in temperature as there is far more cold that energy in the human to have an effect.

Do you see...?

Regards
Jules





GLP