Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,746 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,821,469
Pageviews Today: 2,376,164Threads Today: 526Posts Today: 12,335
04:59 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine

 
701st

User ID: 28624032
Poland
11/28/2012 07:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Thanks 701. hf

 Quoting: BadHairDay


Welcome BHD, anytime hf

Of course I try to read all posts and find many of them very interesting or even intriguing but frankly yours are most easy to understand, at least for myself (not native English speaker - BUT it is NOT about the language, rather clarity of thought processes I'd say LOL)
Krispy71

User ID: 6761984
Netherlands
11/28/2012 07:46 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
It's a bit off-topic but I'm pretty sure BHD & Krispy find this interesting: [link to www.jp-petit.org]
 Quoting: RoXY


Yes I have that one! Really interesting stuff.

I always freak out when I open it for other reasons too.
[wonder if she still lurks here? hf]
 Quoting: BadHairDay


I didnt know about that stuff, so TNX Roxy !!!
Yes its very interesting !!!

kisses
Krispy71

User ID: 6761984
Netherlands
11/28/2012 08:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Will post this here, as will likely be deleted. For those who still enjoy and well honour the original intrigue of this story, a reason has been given why acolyte spoke out so harshly on the other thread. Certain things typed may have indicated he was involved again in the 'project' or feeding new data or interpretations, which in his world are a no-no. EDIT - which he wasnt, nor any of his people.

Fair enough. Maybe a private email next time?


Okay that is enough of this bickering.

BHD, just so you understand - your earlier posts would have caused this thread to become 'active' in the eyes of 'certain people'. SOP would be to ascertain whether Aco was connected to, or feeding this new burst of activity - which would be a big no-no. Aco's response was to signal that he was NOT behind, nor encouraging your posts.

I can tell you that EVERYTHING related to BEZERK that I ever saw in my time with the RRRs, got posted to either or both, the BEZERK and BRIEFCASE threads.

We are all on the same page when it comes to the hard data available - but we are not on the same page when it comes to interpretations.

I'll leave the above posts for a few more days, then I'm deleting all this recent crap.

Peace to you all.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


OK, I re-read your statement there.

Dont delete it. It shows a different aspect that some folks dont even bother with anymore, but is important on some level for others.

There is always email fellas.... no need to so publically attack or humiliate those just havin a dig about, or proposing a theory.

Remember also, that a question placed here is not necessarily directed at OP/Duncan/acolyte. A question is a question, and anyone is welcome to have a go, aren't they? That's why it is posted on a public forum - its called a discussion!
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Leave it up to you. I like the fact that there are differences of opinion about this subject. Not like the EJ days, but alternate interpretation from just as plausible or questionable (LOL) sources. Krispy and I are often referred to as a singular train of thought, when in fact we differ on a lot of things. I guess the core is the same.

Doesnt it make it more interesting that way? Best not to make Assumptions.

- and now, back to regular posting......
 Quoting: BadHairDay



Tnx for sharing here. I am banned from Nexus' thread ....
It is nice to know the reason and the why of the personal attack indeed.

What it sais in my eyes :
If some people from UP-THERE thought that Aco was having contact with us and being 'involved in BEZERK' again,
then we INDEED HIT A JACKPOT NERVE with the research of the last pages !
Otherwise Aco didnt had to defend himself and disgust us [and our thoughts/work] so much.

Yes, lol ... BHD and I differ on a lot of interpretations hahaha, but we are respectful and good about it, its not a problem. Maybe thats why many people think we are 1 and the same "train" ... fact is : sometimes differences work stimulating and are in some ways also complementary :)
And in the same way are other posters-opinions helpful and complementary and stimulating, even if we DONT agree :D
THAT is fantastic !!!


xxx K
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 08:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Absolutely ma dear! hf
It's all about the 'vibe'
Krispy71

User ID: 6761984
Netherlands
11/28/2012 08:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
MZK: I like your new avatar.

 Quoting: Hans The Magnificent


Tnx :D
Its the real me, as I am.
 Quoting: Krispy71


Ms Krispy, you are blessed in Mind, Spirit, and Body.

hugs
 Quoting: Isis7


Ahhh tnx Isis !!!
Not only me, but also my life has multiple blessings.
I am very very grateful for that :D





@ Pre/Per
YUP its ME.
Picture taken a few weeks ago when I was on my work.
For here I made it less a reality picture with colors, but it still resembles the real image and the real me.

Thought it was nice and time that some people realy saw the person behind my posts and research.
OIL SPILL NEWS
User ID: 26355761
United Kingdom
11/28/2012 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
U.S. bans BP from new government contracts after oil spill deal.

The company will not be able to lease new exploration territory in the federal Gulf of Mexico, one of BP's biggest oil production regions globally. Some 20 million acres of offshore territory is being auctioned later Wednesday.

The Interior Department would not award any lease to BP "unless and until" the company resolves its suspension from federal contracts, a department official said on Wednesday.

The EPA statement did not say how long the suspension could last.

"Federal executive branch agencies take these actions to ensure the integrity of federal programs by conducting business only with responsible individuals or companies. Suspensions are a standard practice when a responsibility question is raised by action in a criminal case," it said.

One long-time critic of BP applauded the decision.


"After pleading guilty to such reckless behavior that killed men and constituted a crime against the environment, suspending BP's access to contracts with our government is the right thing to do," U.S. Rep. Edward Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, said in a statement.

OIL SPILL - LATEST.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763216
United States
11/28/2012 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
How far would folks go to cover up a search term I wonder.

Looking up solar initiation module China simply floods google with the current issue of chinese solar cell modules being dumped on the market, initiating a rsponse from US legislators. Page after page.

Just thought that was interesting, or evidence of manipulation of results.
 Quoting: BadHairDay



goo doing that now when they get paid to do it

use some other search engine

bing, dogpile, ... something other than goo
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763216
United States
11/28/2012 03:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
We need to pay attention to this:

Thread: South Florida Beach Emergency

Water (sea) levelappears to be rising along the Florida coast.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763216
United States
11/28/2012 03:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
[link to rt.com]

Link to a story about a inland Chinese man who thinks a flood is coming.

Also, [link to rt.com] there afre French headed to the French Pyrenees.
Isis7

User ID: 25804806
United States
11/28/2012 03:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
With all the earthquakes shaking down around that region, it is a wonder to me that it only sunk 6".


[link to enenews.com]
P ~ P
User ID: 26355761
United Kingdom
11/28/2012 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine


[Snip ...]

Ahhh tnx Isis !!!
Not only me, but also my life has multiple blessings.
I am very very grateful for that :D

@ Pre/Per
YUP its ME.
Picture taken a few weeks ago when I was on my work.
For here I made it less a reality picture with colors, but it still resembles the real image and the real me.

Thought it was nice and time that some people realy saw the person behind my posts and research.
 Quoting: Krispy71


KRISPY

Are you still "going back to your mother for six months every year" same as you did, were when I first knew you in your early incarnation as PROSERPINA (PERSEPHONE), daughter of ZEUS and DEMETER?

Unless we meet in the flesh this time round you will remain forever THE ICON ~ (LOL).

P * P
nexuseditor

User ID: 28657760
Australia
11/28/2012 05:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Will post this here, as will likely be deleted. For those who still enjoy and well honour the original intrigue of this story, a reason has been given why acolyte spoke out so harshly on the other thread. Certain things typed may have indicated he was involved again in the 'project' or feeding new data or interpretations, which in his world are a no-no. EDIT - which he wasnt, nor any of his people.

Fair enough. Maybe a private email next time?


Okay that is enough of this bickering.

BHD, just so you understand - your earlier posts would have caused this thread to become 'active' in the eyes of 'certain people'. SOP would be to ascertain whether Aco was connected to, or feeding this new burst of activity - which would be a big no-no. Aco's response was to signal that he was NOT behind, nor encouraging your posts.

I can tell you that EVERYTHING related to BEZERK that I ever saw in my time with the RRRs, got posted to either or both, the BEZERK and BRIEFCASE threads.

We are all on the same page when it comes to the hard data available - but we are not on the same page when it comes to interpretations.

I'll leave the above posts for a few more days, then I'm deleting all this recent crap.

Peace to you all.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


OK, I re-read your statement there.

Dont delete it. It shows a different aspect that some folks dont even bother with anymore, but is important on some level for others.

There is always email fellas.... no need to so publically attack or humiliate those just havin a dig about, or proposing a theory.

Remember also, that a question placed here is not necessarily directed at OP/Duncan/acolyte. A question is a question, and anyone is welcome to have a go, aren't they? That's why it is posted on a public forum - its called a discussion!
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Leave it up to you. I like the fact that there are differences of opinion about this subject. Not like the EJ days, but alternate interpretation from just as plausible or questionable (LOL) sources. Krispy and I are often referred to as a singular train of thought, when in fact we differ on a lot of things. I guess the core is the same.

Doesnt it make it more interesting that way? Best not to make Assumptions.

- and now, back to regular posting......
 Quoting: BadHairDay



Tnx for sharing here. I am banned from Nexus' thread ....
It is nice to know the reason and the why of the personal attack indeed.


What it sais in my eyes :
If some people from UP-THERE thought that Aco was having contact with us and being 'involved in BEZERK' again,
then we INDEED HIT A JACKPOT NERVE with the research of the last pages !
Otherwise Aco didnt had to defend himself and disgust us [and our thoughts/work] so much.

Yes, lol ... BHD and I differ on a lot of interpretations hahaha, but we are respectful and good about it, its not a problem. Maybe thats why many people think we are 1 and the same "train" ... fact is : sometimes differences work stimulating and are in some ways also complementary :)
And in the same way are other posters-opinions helpful and complementary and stimulating, even if we DONT agree :D
THAT is fantastic !!!


xxx K
 Quoting: Krispy71




Krispy, you are NOT banned from ANY of my threads, and were never banned from any of my threads.

So please stop with all the lies and bullshit.

Aco is disgusted because he sees people being told by you, over and over, that the organism is here to SAVE the planet - whereas Aco believes that it is NOT here to save the planet at all. You were given inside info to assess on the matter, but you chose to reject it all in favour of your own egomaniac dreams.

NOBODY on that side of the fence thinks the organism is here to save the planet. There might be some differences on how to spin WHO is to blame for the organism, but all agree it is not friendly and that it has killed many humans and non-humans already.

Even now, when I look back at the last few dozen pages of this thread, I see you Krispy, continually cherry-picking data and dots which ONLY back up YOUR personal beliefs and wants. That is NOT called RESEARCH, it is called trying to convince people that you are right, and to get them to see your point of view.

BEZERK was an experiment to 'test the water' for when they reveal the organism problem, and more, to the wider world. So they chose a 'safe' outlet - a public forum for the most bizarre stuff on the net - and watched the reactions. I can imagine them groaning and putting their faces in their hands, as they watched Krispy and her love affair with the organism hijack the whole debate with emotion and new age bling.

This thread is evidence that even at GLP, most people cannot handle shocking information - and will come up with some new-age bling fantasy to emotionally shield themselves from the shock.
"The nature of the universe is such that ends can never justify the means. On the contrary, the means always determine the end."
(Aldous Huxley)
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 05:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Without 'the other side' to be here in 'brisk' discussion, then only one side does get put up Nex'.

I've mentioned it a couple of times, and a few more folks are contributing and offering alternative views which is really healthy.

Bit unfair to say K only finds dots to corroberate her view, as that's just Human nature. aco' has a particular view, and sees all connected to it through the same glasses, so cannot entertain any other interpretation. His possible intelligence back ground also flavours his views.

Yes? No?

When this thread was rockin along, all types were here. It's not our fault that we chose to stay and contribute our ideas here. But there are still enough differences to make it interesting. The thread count still demonstrates that.

Mind you, it's not like there were any other venues open for this type of discussion. You guys made sure of that. So K and I are not banned at the C site?

Not defending her, she doesnt need that, but am defending open discussion on a fascinating subject, fictional or not, happening or not, spin or reality.

In the absence of someone saying "oh, two dots means 'this' then speculation will take their place". That's not our fault, again.

Do you regret linking the magazine to this? Seems so.

You are certainly missed here and elsewhere on this site Duncan.
It's all about the 'vibe'
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
PS - I was led to believe that the exact same outcome occured within the RRR's as did here on the thread, so it seems it's in our natures to do this.
It's all about the 'vibe'
Unit3

User ID: 9834739
United States
11/28/2012 06:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Will post this here, as will likely be deleted. For those who still enjoy and well honour the original intrigue of this story, a reason has been given why acolyte spoke out so harshly on the other thread. Certain things typed may have indicated he was involved again in the 'project' or feeding new data or interpretations, which in his world are a no-no. EDIT - which he wasnt, nor any of his people.

Fair enough. Maybe a private email next time?


Okay that is enough of this bickering.

BHD, just so you understand - your earlier posts would have caused this thread to become 'active' in the eyes of 'certain people'. SOP would be to ascertain whether Aco was connected to, or feeding this new burst of activity - which would be a big no-no. Aco's response was to signal that he was NOT behind, nor encouraging your posts.

I can tell you that EVERYTHING related to BEZERK that I ever saw in my time with the RRRs, got posted to either or both, the BEZERK and BRIEFCASE threads.

We are all on the same page when it comes to the hard data available - but we are not on the same page when it comes to interpretations.

I'll leave the above posts for a few more days, then I'm deleting all this recent crap.

Peace to you all.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


OK, I re-read your statement there.

Dont delete it. It shows a different aspect that some folks dont even bother with anymore, but is important on some level for others.

There is always email fellas.... no need to so publically attack or humiliate those just havin a dig about, or proposing a theory.

Remember also, that a question placed here is not necessarily directed at OP/Duncan/acolyte. A question is a question, and anyone is welcome to have a go, aren't they? That's why it is posted on a public forum - its called a discussion!
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Leave it up to you. I like the fact that there are differences of opinion about this subject. Not like the EJ days, but alternate interpretation from just as plausible or questionable (LOL) sources. Krispy and I are often referred to as a singular train of thought, when in fact we differ on a lot of things. I guess the core is the same.

Doesnt it make it more interesting that way? Best not to make Assumptions.

- and now, back to regular posting......
 Quoting: BadHairDay



Tnx for sharing here. I am banned from Nexus' thread ....
It is nice to know the reason and the why of the personal attack indeed.


What it sais in my eyes :
If some people from UP-THERE thought that Aco was having contact with us and being 'involved in BEZERK' again,
then we INDEED HIT A JACKPOT NERVE with the research of the last pages !
Otherwise Aco didnt had to defend himself and disgust us [and our thoughts/work] so much.

Yes, lol ... BHD and I differ on a lot of interpretations hahaha, but we are respectful and good about it, its not a problem. Maybe thats why many people think we are 1 and the same "train" ... fact is : sometimes differences work stimulating and are in some ways also complementary :)
And in the same way are other posters-opinions helpful and complementary and stimulating, even if we DONT agree :D
THAT is fantastic !!!


xxx K
 Quoting: Krispy71




Krispy, you are NOT banned from ANY of my threads, and were never banned from any of my threads.

So please stop with all the lies and bullshit.

Aco is disgusted because he sees people being told by you, over and over, that the organism is here to SAVE the planet - whereas Aco believes that it is NOT here to save the planet at all. You were given inside info to assess on the matter, but you chose to reject it all in favour of your own egomaniac dreams.

NOBODY on that side of the fence thinks the organism is here to save the planet. There might be some differences on how to spin WHO is to blame for the organism, but all agree it is not friendly and that it has killed many humans and non-humans already.

Even now, when I look back at the last few dozen pages of this thread, I see you Krispy, continually cherry-picking data and dots which ONLY back up YOUR personal beliefs and wants. That is NOT called RESEARCH, it is called trying to convince people that you are right, and to get them to see your point of view.

BEZERK was an experiment to 'test the water' for when they reveal the organism problem, and more, to the wider world. So they chose a 'safe' outlet - a public forum for the most bizarre stuff on the net - and watched the reactions. I can imagine them groaning and putting their faces in their hands, as they watched Krispy and her love affair with the organism hijack the whole debate with emotion and new age bling.

This thread is evidence that even at GLP, most people cannot handle shocking information - and will come up with some new-age bling fantasy to emotionally shield themselves from the shock.
 Quoting: nexuseditor




Hi All,

I'm a recent lurker here. I started at the back pages of this thread and moving inwards. I love the research I see going on in these back pages. So thanks.

However, in an attempt to catch up, would anyone be willing to link me to the pages where the "shocking" information is? I'll be glad to do my own research on it. The reason I'm posting is I feel this information is related to something else I've just run across.

And I'll be glad to come back to share what I get out of it.
I mine data but I share it too. I don't have a scarcity mentality. I'm the opposite in fact....the more I share, the more I receive, heh!

It's just so difficult to go through so many pages of so many threads here on GLP, LOL! This is the most exciting time of my life. I just can't get enough as I am sure is the same for many of you. I think of GLP as a huge think tank. (well for the discriminating anyway, heh)

As a thank you for helping me, I'd like to provide a link I find interesting. I'm still new at looking at it (just found it yesterday), but I think we are in for another quantum leap with data.

It's called The Human Face of Big Data.
[link to humanfaceofbigdata.com]

Some of the things they are finding out:
1) All bullet trains in Japan stopped 43 seconds before the eq (due to the sensors Japan installed).
2) People who watch tv for their news, have a belief in an afterlife; whereas the majority of those who get their news from the internet, do not.
3) Control towers in airports have radar readers that have thrown out radar readings they call "noise." The noise is patterns from bees, bats, birds, etc: (noise being interference with the planes they are watching). Scientists just found out about it and are gathering the data because they want to study it. They believe it will show migratory patterns.
4) You can sign up to find your data doppleganger.
5) The average person today, processes more information in one day, than a person in the 1500's processed in a lifetime.
6) They are gathering tweets and finding all kinds of patterns which is just now being reported. Apparently, the big face of data is a book that also has barcodes for movies you can watch. Pretty cool I think...if they are doing it the way I think they will..which is to upload interesting information as they find it.

To me, this shows we are on the brink of a data quantum jump. No telling what all will come out. Like I say, I've just started poking my nose in it.

Also, I don't know if you have discussed this or seen it, but next month, NASA is going to announce something mind-blowing from the Mars probe. I can't find the original article but here's another article about it:
[link to www.wired.com]

Of course, as usual, we will probably have to read between the lines and the suppression of evidence of all this new information, but we're used to that, right?

Anyway, thanks so much. And have a great day. peace

Edit: typos and clarity.

Last Edited by ERE3 on 11/28/2012 06:35 PM
"We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of dreams." Willy Wonka
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 06:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
del.

Last Edited by BadHairDay on 11/28/2012 07:32 PM
It's all about the 'vibe'
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 07:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Welcome UNIT3. I've seen you about on a few threads I frequent too. The sink hole and beach destruction/rising tides comes to mind. I also think its related.

Probably the best thing to read is the OP/acolyte ONLY text.

This is the input, which at times was 'at the moment' and being relayed to this thread.

They can be found here - (this was Krispy's hard work btw.)

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

At one point, the OP 'came out' and explained he was acolyte, an avid poster on this site, and that he was part of a group within a think tank within the RAND group known as the RRR's. (Rand Rubicon Revealers)

It kind of changed the dynamic, but I think it was meant to.

Anyway, read those pages first to get an idea behind the story.

The thread became quite polarised at a point, and split in two, with Nex'Ed' creating a separate thread called the Briefcase thread, where OP continued posting. We all have our own ideas on why that happened. But just take it for face value atm, and go with it.

Thread: Chinese briefcases were opened today - what will you be told?

The briefcase thread has less.... lovey dovey? (LOL) in it, and is more straight forward, completely on topic, and monitored quite harshly by Nex'Ed' to keep it that way.

The topic further fractured with a whole other site being created to manage it, but due to acolyte's loyalties and back ground, the subject cannot be discussed there. Rather a related topic is the emphasis, based on a channelled entity.

[I dont think I can post this link. LOL]

It's all good stuff. The 'sides' are irrelevant until you sift through it all, and breath it all in. LOL. Even then, regardless of wher you think it all stands, I hope you stay around to discuss your ideas and research.

Dont be taken a back if you get the odd - "Oh, we covered that on page 1,123...." as there is so much information contained within these pages. Its a real mish mash.

Again, welcome aboard. HF

Last Edited by BadHairDay on 11/28/2012 07:21 PM
It's all about the 'vibe'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12790821
United States
11/28/2012 07:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
What? This shit? Still? Really? This shit is almost 3 years old already. The funny wore off 2 summers ago.
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 07:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
What? This shit? Still? Really? This shit is almost 3 years old already. The funny wore off 2 summers ago.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12790821


Appreciate the bump. hf
It's all about the 'vibe'
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 07:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
OK, assuming the substance down there is bad, and has as it's core intent, badness for all things living on this world, especially Humans, then the events we are seeing in and around the GoM are all an attempt to what?

1/. Destroy the substance, or contain it.

2/. Free the substance and let it flourish.

3/. A bit of both, allowing it to do it's programmed thing, but within a possibly controlled area.

Forgetting individual truths, how does the above work then?

Bezerk, as has been mentioned before, must be older than 2 years, purely from the perspective it was measured, catalogued and broadcast as bezerk. The science behind some of the words used to create anagram are only recent science, of the past 30 years - if you take HD's solution to the anagram at face value.

Taking the discussion back a little, as K said, referring to the OP's original notes, can create some clarity for what is being discussed now.

Any thoughts?
It's all about the 'vibe'
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 08:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
LOL, Isis, you're timing is impeccable!! My account lasts until December 22nd! LOL (just one more thank you!)
It's all about the 'vibe'
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/28/2012 08:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
BEZERK was an experiment to 'test the water' for when they reveal the organism problem, and more, to the wider world. So they chose a 'safe' outlet - a public forum for the most bizarre stuff on the net - and watched the reactions. I can imagine them groaning and putting their faces in their hands, as they watched Krispy and her love affair with the organism hijack the whole debate with emotion and new age bling.

This thread is evidence that even at GLP, most people cannot handle shocking information - and will come up with some new-age bling fantasy to emotionally shield themselves from the shock.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


Nex' do you really live your life by this? I mean if you accept it's over, and that we will either be dominated by CHIN overlords, killed off by the organism, or have our world terraformed for alien arrivals.... then what's the point of it all?

I guess the Jan/Feb edition is on hold? My Mum says hi btw, she's a subscriber. Should I brake the bad news to her?

Please take that as the joke it was intended to be.

The living Earth is one of the oldest notions held dear to both ancient and recent man. It's hardly new age bling. Nor is the idea that water is the source of all life.

Given who you are, and the amazing life you have made for yourself, the magazine you have built, and the people you connect with, I find your comments so frustrating and confusing Nex'.
It's all about the 'vibe'
Isis7

User ID: 25804806
United States
11/28/2012 08:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
LOL, Isis, you're timing is impeccable!! My account lasts until December 22nd! LOL (just one more thank you!)
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Awe BHD, thank you for all you do

smile_kiss
Unit3

User ID: 9834739
United States
11/28/2012 08:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Welcome UNIT3. I've seen you about on a few threads I frequent too. The sink hole and beach destruction/rising tides comes to mind. I also think its related.

Probably the best thing to read is the OP/acolyte ONLY text.

This is the input, which at times was 'at the moment' and being relayed to this thread.

They can be found here - (this was Krispy's hard work btw.)

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

At one point, the OP 'came out' and explained he was acolyte, an avid poster on this site, and that he was part of a group within a think tank within the RAND group known as the RRR's. (Rand Rubicon Revealers)

It kind of changed the dynamic, but I think it was meant to.

Anyway, read those pages first to get an idea behind the story.

The thread became quite polarised at a point, and split in two, with Nex'Ed' creating a separate thread called the Briefcase thread, where OP continued posting. We all have our own ideas on why that happened. But just take it for face value atm, and go with it.

Thread: Chinese briefcases were opened today - what will you be told?

The briefcase thread has less.... lovey dovey? (LOL) in it, and is more straight forward, completely on topic, and monitored quite harshly by Nex'Ed' to keep it that way.

The topic further fractured with a whole other site being created to manage it, but due to acolyte's loyalties and back ground, the subject cannot be discussed there. Rather a related topic is the emphasis, based on a channelled entity.

[I dont think I can post this link. LOL]

It's all good stuff. The 'sides' are irrelevant until you sift through it all, and breath it all in. LOL. Even then, regardless of wher you think it all stands, I hope you stay around to discuss your ideas and research.

Dont be taken a back if you get the odd - "Oh, we covered that on page 1,123...." as there is so much information contained within these pages. Its a real mish mash.

Again, welcome aboard. HF
 Quoting: BadHairDay





Awesome. Thank you thank you. hf This is perfect.

I will study the links and if it connects with something, I'll surely share it. Just give me a little time. All of a sudden, in the past 20 minutes, I have 3 commitments that may all take a little time. Oh what to do? heh!

Thanks to Krispy and others for their work.

And thank you for the welcome! How nice. ;o)

Edit: Well I've read quite a bit of Krispy's thread. I had no idea! Wow! Thanks guys for keeping an eye on this. It's amazing.

Now I'm kind of embarrassed of the links I told you about when I introduced myself. They have nothing to do with what you are researching about. heh!

Anyway, I'll be back to study more and share. afro

Another Edit: I'll go ahead and tell you what is going on with me and why I picked this particular time to post. When I read OP's post re: "the organism", it reminded me of a syfy story I'm reading by Gregory Benford. a physics professor who advises NASA. Here's a copy/paste from his bio:

"...research in plasma turbulence theory and experiment, and in astrophysics. His published scientific articles include well over a hundred papers in fields of physics from condensed matter, particle physics, plasmas and mathematical physics, and several in biological conservation."

The name of the story is A Dance to Strange Musics. I've often wondered if some of the scientists try to get information out to us hidden in their stories. Anyway, he published this story in 2000. The event you are talking about took place in 2010 which means the information he talks about in the story was available before the event.

I haven't read enough from this thread yet to see if there is something to connect the 2, but just thought it interesting.

Last Edited by ERE3 on 11/29/2012 03:18 AM
"We are the music makers. And we are the dreamers of dreams." Willy Wonka
lasombra

User ID: 2920692
United States
11/29/2012 02:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Nex' do you really live your life by this? I mean if you accept it's over, and that we will either be dominated by CHIN overlords, killed off by the organism, or have our world terraformed for alien arrivals.... then what's the point of it all?

I guess the Jan/Feb edition is on hold? My Mum says hi btw, she's a subscriber. Should I brake the bad news to her?

Please take that as the joke it was intended to be.

The living Earth is one of the oldest notions held dear to both ancient and recent man. It's hardly new age bling. Nor is the idea that water is the source of all life.

Given who you are, and the amazing life you have made for yourself, the magazine you have built, and the people you connect with, I find your comments so frustrating and confusing Nex'.
 Quoting: BadHairDay



A couple of recent posts by NexEd have struck me as being peculiarly out of character. I guess that can happen when the realization of genuinely existing "doom" finally hits home.

Sometimes you come out the other side with the acceptance that death is our constant companion, and always has been. Once that settles in, you begin to notice the amazing resiliency of life in general and how the unexpected has a habit of happening despite what we think we absolutely know.


and shooting off in another direction (or is it?)
Information relating to that quantum field and DNA connection mentioned a few pages back keeps popping up, along with a bunch of stuff like the collider creating a new form of matter and, well, a lot of random things that may have no relation what-so-ever, but then again maybe they do. Nature seems to always seek balance doesn't it?

Finding dots that support my bling ;) This one is nice...
[link to www.nature.com]

"On the face of it, quantum effects and living organisms seem to occupy utterly different realms. The former are usually observed only on the nanometre scale, surrounded by hard vacuum, ultra-low temperatures and a tightly controlled laboratory environment. The latter inhabit a macroscopic world that is warm, messy and anything but controlled. A quantum phenomenon such as 'coherence', in which the wave patterns of every part of a system stay in step, wouldn't last a microsecond in the tumultuous realm of the cell.

Or so everyone thought. But discoveries in recent years suggest that nature knows a few tricks that physicists don't: coherent quantum processes may well be ubiquitous in the natural world."

Some of the other random reading links:

[link to scitechstory.com]
[link to phys.org]
[link to phys.org]
[link to hplusmagazine.com]
[link to phys.org]
[link to www.ks.uiuc.edu]
[link to library.thinkquest.org]
[link to discovermagazine.com]


Then again, maybe I'm just up too late to be sensible. lol
peace
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
Navajo Proverb
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/29/2012 04:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Hi Lasombra, like a few of my rants of late, I regret not vetting them thouroughly before hitting the post button. I was waay too personal in what I said there, and most is none of my business.
It's all about the 'vibe'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28699271
Australia
11/29/2012 04:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
The French? Now that is one coalition EVERY Englishman would love to join.

Finally the income tax may have a legitimate reason to exist again. War on France!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 863042


You british idiot are all the same. So jealous of the French. All that aggression that your nation has spewed on the world has left us all with the impression that all british man need war to make themselves feel big because they are all under the thumb.
Shame on you Britania.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9132775
France
11/29/2012 05:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
The French? Now that is one coalition EVERY Englishman would love to join.

Finally the income tax may have a legitimate reason to exist again. War on France!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 863042


You british idiot are all the same. So jealous of the French. All that aggression that your nation has spewed on the world has left us all with the impression that all british man need war to make themselves feel big because they are all under the thumb.
Shame on you Britania.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28699271


hf
BadHairDay

User ID: 15456734
Australia
11/29/2012 06:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
WTF?
It's all about the 'vibe'
Krispy71

User ID: 6761984
Netherlands
11/29/2012 08:08 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine
Will post this here, as will likely be deleted. For those who still enjoy and well honour the original intrigue of this story, a reason has been given why acolyte spoke out so harshly on the other thread. Certain things typed may have indicated he was involved again in the 'project' or feeding new data or interpretations, which in his world are a no-no. EDIT - which he wasnt, nor any of his people.

Fair enough. Maybe a private email next time?


Okay that is enough of this bickering.

BHD, just so you understand - your earlier posts would have caused this thread to become 'active' in the eyes of 'certain people'. SOP would be to ascertain whether Aco was connected to, or feeding this new burst of activity - which would be a big no-no. Aco's response was to signal that he was NOT behind, nor encouraging your posts.

I can tell you that EVERYTHING related to BEZERK that I ever saw in my time with the RRRs, got posted to either or both, the BEZERK and BRIEFCASE threads.

We are all on the same page when it comes to the hard data available - but we are not on the same page when it comes to interpretations.

I'll leave the above posts for a few more days, then I'm deleting all this recent crap.

Peace to you all.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


OK, I re-read your statement there.

Dont delete it. It shows a different aspect that some folks dont even bother with anymore, but is important on some level for others.

There is always email fellas.... no need to so publically attack or humiliate those just havin a dig about, or proposing a theory.

Remember also, that a question placed here is not necessarily directed at OP/Duncan/acolyte. A question is a question, and anyone is welcome to have a go, aren't they? That's why it is posted on a public forum - its called a discussion!
 Quoting: BadHairDay


Leave it up to you. I like the fact that there are differences of opinion about this subject. Not like the EJ days, but alternate interpretation from just as plausible or questionable (LOL) sources. Krispy and I are often referred to as a singular train of thought, when in fact we differ on a lot of things. I guess the core is the same.

Doesnt it make it more interesting that way? Best not to make Assumptions.

- and now, back to regular posting......
 Quoting: BadHairDay



Tnx for sharing here. I am banned from Nexus' thread ....
It is nice to know the reason and the why of the personal attack indeed.


What it sais in my eyes :
If some people from UP-THERE thought that Aco was having contact with us and being 'involved in BEZERK' again,
then we INDEED HIT A JACKPOT NERVE with the research of the last pages !
Otherwise Aco didnt had to defend himself and disgust us [and our thoughts/work] so much.

Yes, lol ... BHD and I differ on a lot of interpretations hahaha, but we are respectful and good about it, its not a problem. Maybe thats why many people think we are 1 and the same "train" ... fact is : sometimes differences work stimulating and are in some ways also complementary :)
And in the same way are other posters-opinions helpful and complementary and stimulating, even if we DONT agree :D
THAT is fantastic !!!


xxx K
 Quoting: Krispy71




Krispy, you are NOT banned from ANY of my threads, and were never banned from any of my threads.

So please stop with all the lies and bullshit.

Aco is disgusted because he sees people being told by you, over and over, that the organism is here to SAVE the planet - whereas Aco believes that it is NOT here to save the planet at all. You were given inside info to assess on the matter, but you chose to reject it all in favour of your own egomaniac dreams.

NOBODY on that side of the fence thinks the organism is here to save the planet. There might be some differences on how to spin WHO is to blame for the organism, but all agree it is not friendly and that it has killed many humans and non-humans already.

Even now, when I look back at the last few dozen pages of this thread, I see you Krispy, continually cherry-picking data and dots which ONLY back up YOUR personal beliefs and wants. That is NOT called RESEARCH, it is called trying to convince people that you are right, and to get them to see your point of view.

BEZERK was an experiment to 'test the water' for when they reveal the organism problem, and more, to the wider world. So they chose a 'safe' outlet - a public forum for the most bizarre stuff on the net - and watched the reactions. I can imagine them groaning and putting their faces in their hands, as they watched Krispy and her love affair with the organism hijack the whole debate with emotion and new age bling.

This thread is evidence that even at GLP, most people cannot handle shocking information - and will come up with some new-age bling fantasy to emotionally shield themselves from the shock.
 Quoting: nexuseditor


Nexus, There were several times that I tried to post in your threads, and got the message that I was not alowed to do so, that I was banned from doing that.
After that I left your threads alone.
No lies and no bullshit about it.
I could understand why you would have choosen to do so, and it was fine by me.
So there are no bad feelings for it towards you, its okay.


Quote you : Aco is disgusted because he sees people being told by you, over and over, that the organism is here to SAVE the planet - whereas Aco believes that it is NOT here to save the planet at all.

The difference between Aco's BELIEVE and my saying is that I and others have given scientific examples and other information why it looks that way and why we think so.
Acp nEVER came up with any backing-up [scientific or otherwise] why [some of] the R's and he believed so,
we all know and have read the chat where it is said that the R's are not all thinking the same as Aco did, that half of them thought differently then Aco and some of his colleagues ....
So since WHEN is Aco's "believe" a rule and guideline without exception ? A believe without any scientific back-up, nor mythical back-up's ...
I indeed share where I see and find dots and connections and articles that back-up earlier info and thoughts/believes ...
but whether some-one else believes what I say and post is a bigggg difference. No one has to BELIEVE me, I want every one to make up their own mind/feelings. THEY decide for themselves what to believe and what to also agree with or not.

The info I got in the beginning was the same as every one else of the group got.
The difference is that Aco was so enthusiastic about my dreams that he asked if he could share them with the people he worked with. Later on there were other people who contacted me and were interested in what I saw in my dreams.
I have mails to back this up.
And you are exaggerating when you claim I rejected ALL, ... I wouldnt be quoting some of OP/Aco's postings if that was true what you claim.

Quote you: "BEZERK was an experiment to 'test the water' for when they reveal the organism problem, and more, to the wider world. "
Thats the first time I hear those words.


The above post of you is evidence that even at GLP, most people cannot handle that some people come up with information that shows a different view [backed up by science and history] then that which was planed "to seed and to be digested" by the thread/test-group - and evidence that tactics will come up to tackle and personally attack those who are "in their waters" with lies and derail the rest of the people following this thread, to shock them and make them doubt.

But a nice detail is that most of the people following this thread are all people with a own mind > they are independent thinkers ... and people who can work together even if there are differences in opinion on some aspects.
Your tactics dont work for me , and not for most of them.
And even if there would be people that believe you without a doubt, that would be fine by me, no problem ... I dont want people to JUST BELIEVE what I say {[I dont want to have "followers"] , I am happy when I read that people think alike coz they understand what I see/feel and what I provide on scientific evidence, but I am also okay with people expressing their different views.
I am not okay with people personal attacking, and try to score that way.

We are FREE THINKERS working collectively on something BEZERK.


XXX K

News