Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine

Was today that they tested ?

Check EQ data ?

I keep thinking about what the OP of an other thread said :
people would be relieved, but that would only be of short time coz things would get VERY bad afther the sigh ...
....
I hope they can CAN this jar, but something inside is telling

EDIT oops wrong smiley > type : - then watch- : ...lol...

Last Edited by Krispy71 on 07/14/2010 04:28 PM

3.8 and 4.2 registered

Thread: Don't you find it strange (NOT A SINGLE AFTERSHOCK AFTER CANADA QUAKE)

Found no data from that area suggesting siesmic activity at all. Should have figured as much, huh ?

Hey everyone....still no word from the OP? Must have bugged out.

Couldn't find anything either..

Found it!!!


[link to earthquakescanada.nrcan.gc.ca]

..

I was thinking along the same lines. But is nowhere near test site. But there was a few EQ's in upper east coast region. You'd think they would test under water at depth like atlantic or something. maybe that whale met its demise another way ?

Good catch. Makes sense, and the date too.

Looks like it. Report said Ft McPherson is 80 KM from the test site. Map on your link shows that.

Can't you please stop with the non-sense already?

Just ruminating here: Because the French sub even considered attacking the nation (their sub) which evidently sunk the DWH, that tells me that it wasn’t the U.S. or Russia or even China, but some lesser nation, like North Korea. A French captain would hardly suggest an attack against a major world power. What if Sorcha Faal was right about NK doing the deed? Here’s the way I see it. BP set up a genuine blowout and there was a methane overwhelm onto the rig which cause explosions, fires, and the destruction of the 30,000hp engine. But, IF the riser pipe (hundred feet or more below surface) had been broken with explosives, there would not have been a methane overwhelm onto the rig because the pipe would instantly be spewing into the depths. I don’t believe the riser pipe was sabotaged; it probably burst at a joint because of methane explosion pressure, during the same time the rig operators were suffering the blowout. And suddenly the blowout ceased on the rig when the riser pipe broke. But the rig should not have sunk just because of the fires on it. It sank because one of the pontoons was punctured below waterline, thus compromising it. Somebody had to do that deliberately, perhaps NK or other. So, if the French say they have video evidence, what could that be? Well, it might be of the DWH rig lying on the ocean floor with a suicide sub near it which the French could photograph. What other evidence is there of this event except that lying on the bottom? Sorcha suggested that it was a suicide mission for that sub. If so, that would be good reason for intense international secrecy.
And when our OP realized this, he figured it would be too risky to reveal any more info. Video proof suddenly charges somebody with an act of war which could trigger WWIII. We might not hear from him again, and I sure wouldn’t blame him for that.

I just pulled up Goole Earth, Located the epicenter of the quake, and located Fort McPherson. They are 47.5 Miles apart, or 76.4 KM

This is a really good match the article. It said 80 km from Fort McPherson.

Dates work out good, too.

Looks like the smoking gun.

Yup

From test to launch. Wondering when ?

Another good synopsis

GREAT WORK guys !!!! Keep that going !




i have to bug out for a while too ...
will be back in about 1 or 2 hours.

I have a sister in Houston and am wondering what I should tell her.

Perception is individual. I read that "venezuela" meant off the coast of Venezuela is where this action of the two hits took place. OP was responding to questions. I do not think the response was intended to say that the planes were Venezuelan.

In this thread, it is sometime difficult to read with clarity because poster members have edit privileges and some have changed their posts. Was there a question to OP about the location?

Ask her to check and see if Red Cross is setting up volunteers in Brownsville. If so, why?

These operations are taking place in the Gulf of Mexico. The coast of Venezuela is much too far away.
OP's post on 6/29 9:41AM..

Em captain says pipes forming on seabed and leading from rim
GCP captain stil has proximity alert on cargo, waiting for instructions
there are other DED channel alerts also but they not from the gulf of mexico

my first post here on this thread.

Finding that quake says this story has true "legs".

Amazing.

( there's nothing on the USGS site ! )

From the link given by Renegade in that thread:

"Some sort of soft metal would also have to be pumped into the well before the EPFCG device could be detonated".

What kind of metal could it have been? Nano metal?

But did they conduct the test a mile under water or is this a stupid question?

Not underwater
Preliminary reports suggest that the device was detonated 500 meters underground at a location deep in the Canadian Arctic.

Stage 1 of the test occurred at CFB Suffield where a non-nuclear EPFCG was detonated in a operational oil well.

Stage 2 was the testing of the nuclear percussion weapon in the high Canadian Arctic.

Last Edited by RenegadeSon on 07/14/2010 05:10 PM

read my earlier post. Search for nasty nasty

Page 253

There is a second Ft. Mac?