Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine

crap i shuldent be duing this but has it crost anybodys mind that this woteveritis organism spasifakaly atakt a rasial minoraty 20 persent mmmmm or is that 100 persent of a patikuler typ of rase


Yes but what is a racial minority?
I have often wondered as to multiculturalism and the time it takes to dilute a given race. This is why I thought and posted as to gene warfare. There were no takers so I assume I was in error.

crap i shuldent be duing this but has it crost anybodys mind that this woteveritis organism spasifakaly atakt a rasial minoraty 20 persent mmmmm or is that 100 persent of a patikuler typ of rase

crap i shuldent be duing this but has it crost anybodys mind that this woteveritis organism spasifakaly atakt a rasial minoraty 20 persent mmmmm or is that 100 persent of a patikuler typ of rase

Yes it did ej but there is so much racial mixing these days that the penetration would never be 100%!

See things for what they are and dont make more out of it and certainly dont fly away with it on a doom-trip.
The DOOM lies in the multiple things that play out and play their role, and certainly not soley and only with this organism on itself.
We are very easy to point the blame to something,
but we sometimes forget that the picture is bigger then the street we look in. We have to try to see the whole 360* (degree) picture instead of only where our fear takes us.

We on this thread are responsable for getting the TRUTH out.
We have to go back to the DED-transcrips every time and see if we are right and still true to the facts that we have been given.
Suggestions and speculations are fine, but keep them as that in your mind : just speculations and possibilities.



edit for typo's

crap i shuldent be duing this but has it crost anybodys mind that this woteveritis organism spasifakaly atakt a rasial minoraty 20 persent mmmmm or is that 100 persent of a patikuler typ of rase

Yes it did ej but there is so much racial mixing these days that the penetration would never be 100%!

never the lest it would be interesting to no out fo all the reported dead how many ware of dark skin and how many ware mixt rase and how many ware white

goodmornihg everyone

having red the coments plased sins last night somthing is quiet obvius proof or rather the lack of it to conferm our reported events i am in total agrement with the previus poster on his coments ok so wo go to the facts we hav a damaged french sub incapable of submersion it would be good if we can identify its home base or ware the french manufacture and repair thare sub is it thare if not ware is it it neads fixing to be usable again if this could be confermed say by sum of our french members who am sure would find it a lot easier than the rest of us to find out this info it would be a key bit of info going a hell of a long way as to proving all that has been sed on this thread we need proof otherwise all we are duing is just writing a story based on fiction not facts my opinion its best to all we find proof for all consernd we need it and we need it yesterday

I too have been watching from the first day but have to respectfully disagree.The fact that some posters have put extraordinary effort into the thread is obvious but it does not give them right of ownership.The thread was begun by OP and the rest of us are merely players.Hopefully we can leave our egos out of it and learn to cooperate as a working unit regardless of when we became interested in the thread.Personal attacks are childish as is cliquishness.Let's give credit where credit is due and then get on with the job at hand in an atmostphere of mutual respect and harmony.

nise like it ok pepol ware is your proof for thes events i want to see it frankly am sik of all thes dipstiks who seam to do nothing other than caus truble without proposing anything to futher our investigations so i say to you all find some concreat proof of all this facts confermable facts
without them this thread is just soshal masterbation

here is a fact
dam near 500 pages of coments and not one pease of confermable evidans of the atak on a french sub by the us or for that mater any external confamation about any events posted by the op
y not . i hav nothing further to ad until one of us posts proof of theas events actualy took plase

i find i am actualy gulty of speculating on thes isues myself as well wen i should be puting all eforts in to conferming thes events first so i admit that in the hope others may see my point and ases wot it is they are here for and trying to acheave in the hope that sum may realise we nead confamation sumhow first

I think the theatre being referred to in that post was the Falklands, but I'm not 100% sure.

OP could you please clarify,which is the second theatre?Is it The Falklands as Nexus editor suggested or somwhere else?I believe that many of us are unsure of this fact.

I think the theatre being referred to in that post was the Falklands, but I'm not 100% sure.


Based on recent posts I find myself agreeing.

How long is your site down for mate? I have been trying get something all day

goodmornihg everyone

having red the coments plased sins last night somthing is quiet obvius proof or rather the lack of it to conferm our reported events i am in total agrement with the previus poster on his coments ok so wo go to the facts we hav a damaged french sub incapable of submersion it would be good if we can identify its home base or ware the french manufacture and repair thare sub is it thare if not ware is it it neads fixing to be usable again if this could be confermed say by sum of our french members who am sure would find it a lot easier than the rest of us to find out this info it would be a key bit of info going a hell of a long way as to proving all that has been sed on this thread we need proof otherwise all we are duing is just writing a story based on fiction not facts my opinion its best to all we find proof for all consernd we need it and we need it yesterday




I too have been watching from the first day but have to respectfully disagree.The fact that some posters have put extraordinary effort into the thread is obvious but it does not give them right of ownership.The thread was begun by OP and the rest of us are merely players.Hopefully we can leave our egos out of it and learn to cooperate as a working unit regardless of when we became interested in the thread.Personal attacks are childish as is cliquishness.Let's give credit where credit is due and then get on with the job at hand in an atmostphere of mutual respect and harmony.

nise like it ok pepol ware is your proof for thes events i want to see it frankly am sik of all thes dipstiks who seam to do nothing other than caus truble without proposing anything to futher our investigations so i say to you all find some concreat proof of all this facts confermable facts
without them this thread is just soshal masterbation



here is a fact
dam near 500 pages of coments and not one pease of confermable evidans of the atak on a french sub by the us or for that mater any external confamation about any events posted by the op
y not . i hav nothing further to ad until one of us posts proof of theas events actualy took plase


quote:ej 1084956]


here is a fact
dam near 500 pages of coments and not one pease of confermable evidans of the atak on a french sub by the us or for that mater any external confamation about any events posted by the op
y not . i hav nothing further to ad until one of us posts proof of theas events actualy took plase



Ok, i just gotta take an extra minute for this one.

From strong experience dealing with the US Navy and the US military, I can assure you that there are hundreds of wild, scary, and downright dangerous things the military has had done to them and they do to our adversaries, and you never have and never will hear a word of it.

The only way any of us will hear about that sub is if it is in the interest of one of the countries involved.

For the really important secrets, the militaries of the world are real good at keeping them secret.

So don't always take the lack of immediate evidence as a lack of truth, Especially if it has to do with the military.

yes i agre with you totaly howeaver if nobody cums up with at least one confermable peas of info say from monitering comershal shiping coms a confermed sightig of any of the vesals in the op post confamation as far as i understand this threads info provided by the op should be the only prioraty all other isues cum secondery to that i find myself very frustrated with the lak of pepol trying to conferm events and chosing to speculate on un confermed infomation regading bio wotevers and codes this searves no perpos at all conferming this event is key otherwise everyones great eforts here are totaly wasted proof shuld be paramout alas without it we hav nothig but a good story



i find i am actualy gulty of speculating on thes isues myself as well wen i should be puting all eforts in to conferming thes events first so i admit that in the hope others may see my point and ases wot it is they are here for and trying to acheave in the hope that sum may realise we nead confamation sumhow first



Ok, as someone pointed out above, you come in spamming the thread semming to be as interested in "what could possibly be" as anyone else here.

Then after a few pot shots at your validity you are able to deflect them enough to where people brush it off.

Now the question of your intentions comes back full circle...with a little more "umph"..thanks to nexuseditor and you have completely changed your tone.

So I have two conclusions
1. You think we are dumb as shit and have fallen into your sympathy game and because you seemingly caught the ear of others can now change everyone's base belief on this and say "its not true because we dont have evidence"

2. You are dyslexic and obviously now...bipolar.

I think its is number 1, but the problem with that is...ppl that come to this sight seemingly are looking to believe in something that cannot be seen at first glance.....so we dont need freaking evidence as in the court of law....we go by the law of our instincts and intuition.

EJ if you are an operative....your doing a shitty job.

goodmornihg everyone

having red the coments plased sins last night somthing is quiet obvius proof or rather the lack of it to conferm our reported events i am in total agrement with the previus poster on his coments ok so wo go to the facts we hav a damaged french sub incapable of submersion it would be good if we can identify its home base or ware the french manufacture and repair thare sub is it thare if not ware is it it neads fixing to be usable again if this could be confermed say by sum of our french members who am sure would find it a lot easier than the rest of us to find out this info it would be a key bit of info going a hell of a long way as to proving all that has been sed on this thread we need proof otherwise all we are duing is just writing a story based on fiction not facts my opinion its best to all we find proof for all consernd we need it and we need it yesterday




I too have been watching from the first day but have to respectfully disagree.The fact that some posters have put extraordinary effort into the thread is obvious but it does not give them right of ownership.The thread was begun by OP and the rest of us are merely players.Hopefully we can leave our egos out of it and learn to cooperate as a working unit regardless of when we became interested in the thread.Personal attacks are childish as is cliquishness.Let's give credit where credit is due and then get on with the job at hand in an atmostphere of mutual respect and harmony.

nise like it ok pepol ware is your proof for thes events i want to see it frankly am sik of all thes dipstiks who seam to do nothing other than caus truble without proposing anything to futher our investigations so i say to you all find some concreat proof of all this facts confermable facts
without them this thread is just soshal masterbation



here is a fact
dam near 500 pages of coments and not one pease of confermable evidans of the atak on a french sub by the us or for that mater any external confamation about any events posted by the op
y not . i hav nothing further to ad until one of us posts proof of theas events actualy took plase


quote:ej 1084956]


here is a fact
dam near 500 pages of coments and not one pease of confermable evidans of the atak on a french sub by the us or for that mater any external confamation about any events posted by the op
y not . i hav nothing further to ad until one of us posts proof of theas events actualy took plase



Ok, i just gotta take an extra minute for this one.

From strong experience dealing with the US Navy and the US military, I can assure you that there are hundreds of wild, scary, and downright dangerous things the military has had done to them and they do to our adversaries, and you never have and never will hear a word of it.

The only way any of us will hear about that sub is if it is in the interest of one of the countries involved.

For the really important secrets, the militaries of the world are real good at keeping them secret.

So don't always take the lack of immediate evidence as a lack of truth, Especially if it has to do with the military.

yes i agre with you totaly howeaver if nobody cums up with at least one confermable peas of info say from monitering comershal shiping coms a confermed sightig of any of the vesals in the op post confamation as far as i understand this threads info provided by the op should be the only prioraty all other isues cum secondery to that i find myself very frustrated with the lak of pepol trying to conferm events and chosing to speculate on un confermed infomation regading bio wotevers and codes this searves no perpos at all conferming this event is key otherwise everyones great eforts here are totaly wasted proof shuld be paramout alas without it we hav nothig but a good story



i find i am actualy gulty of speculating on thes isues myself as well wen i should be puting all eforts in to conferming thes events first so i admit that in the hope others may see my point and ases wot it is they are here for and trying to acheave in the hope that sum may realise we nead confamation sumhow first



Ok, as someone pointed out above, you come in spamming the thread semming to be as interested in "what could possibly be" as anyone else here.

Then after a few pot shots at your validity you are able to deflect them enough to where people brush it off.

Now the question of your intentions comes back full circle...with a little more "umph"..thanks to nexuseditor and you have completely changed your tone.

So I have two conclusions
1. You think we are dumb as shit and have fallen into your sympathy game and because you seemingly caught the ear of others can now change everyone's base belief on this and say "its not true because we dont have evidence"

2. You are dyslexic and obviously now...bipolar.

I think its is number 1, but the problem with that is...ppl that come to this sight seemingly are looking to believe in something that cannot be seen at first glance.....so we dont need freaking evidence as in the court of law....we go by the law of our instincts and intuition.

EJ if you are an operative....your doing a shitty job.


u call my coments spam
caling for prouf is not spam
u go on about me being an oprativ
think you hav been watching to many films
u now acuse me of being bipolar
personal atak and an insult
u say that i think you are dum as shit
i hav never staed that to anyone
u hav just been reported for abuse
as that is all ure post about

There seems to always be someone stiring the pot...I remember 2 weeks ago it was Owen, now EJ, and a few before that too, it changes the atmosphere here.

Like weather the atmostphere changes sometimes turbulent sometimes calm.That is life.Now I believe that ej is a person who likes to have the facts corroberated,his ducks in a row so to speak.ej correct me if I am wrong.He is correct by saying that none of this is validated in the mainstream media but I wouldn't expect it to be.Unless one of us knows someone who didn't come back from a trip on a submarine we wouldn't know anything for sure at present at least.The no fly zone took care of that.It is much kinder to agree to disagree rather than make unkind personal comments .

in rep User ID: 1086021
yes non in the main stream media but i was actualy caling for members to find and post prouf here may be is the fact that i am an enginer and fix things without acurat info i cant doo this and yes i want to se at leat one peas of pruof for the coments by the op cant understand y everyne els seams not botherd at all by this
[/quote
of course ej as an engineer you have to have the facts straight before you can make a diagnosis and fix the problem.An artist might think very differently.Variety is the spice of life is it not?Engineers and other scientifically minded folks will be on your wavelengths but poets artists writers etc may be on a different wavelength.The trick is to be calmly live and let live!When the ego rears it's ugly head tge going gets tough!I have been where you are many times Howe er I have a feeling that I am quite a bit older than you ej and with age does come a modicum of wisdom, also a lot of grey hair!

There seems to always be someone stiring the pot...I remember 2 weeks ago it was Owen, now EJ, and a few before that too, it changes the atmosphere here.

Like weather the atmostphere changes sometimes turbulent sometimes calm.That is life.Now I believe that ej is a person who likes to have the facts corroberated,his ducks in a row so to speak.ej correct me if I am wrong.He is correct by saying that none of this is validated in the mainstream media but I wouldn't expect it to be.Unless one of us knows someone who didn't come back from a trip on a submarine we wouldn't know anything for sure at present at least.The no fly zone took care of that.It is much kinder to agree to disagree rather than make unkind personal comments .

me, Owen, will now defend this thread and its purpose.
few weeks ago I saw for the first time, how a thread can be distorted by socalled newcomers, I got upset.
I apologized for that, you recall?

Earth changes, ancient organisms....could they have anything to do with solar system changes?

This is interesting....


Is the Sun Emitting a Mystery Particle?

When probing the deepest reaches of the Cosmos or magnifying our understanding of the quantum world, a whole host of mysteries present themselves. This is to be expected when pushing our knowledge of the Universe to the limit.

But what if a well-known -- and apparently constant -- characteristic of matter starts behaving mysteriously?

This is exactly what has been noticed in recent years; the decay rates of radioactive elements are changing. This is especially mysterious as we are talking about elements with "constant" decay rates -- these values aren't supposed to change. School textbooks teach us this from an early age.


WATCH VIDEO: A solar eruption sends a wave of plasma hurtling towards Earth on Aug. 1, 2010. The event was captured by NASA satellites. This is the conclusion that researchers from Stanford and Purdue University have arrived at, but the only explanation they have is even weirder than the phenomenon itself: The sun might be emitting a previously unknown particle that is meddling with the decay rates of matter. Or, at the very least, we are seeing some new physics.

Many fields of science depend on measuring constant decay rates. For example, to accurately date ancient artifacts, archaeologists measure the quantity of carbon-14 found inside organic samples at dig sites. This is a technique known as carbon dating.

Carbon-14 has a very defined half-life of 5730 years; i.e. it takes 5,730 years for half of a sample of carbon-14 to radioactively decay into stable nitrogen-14. Through spectroscopic analysis of the ancient organic sample, by finding out what proportion of carbon-14 remains, we can accurately calculate how old it is.

But as you can see, carbon dating makes one huge assumption: radioactive decay rates remain constant and always have been constant. If this new finding is proven to be correct, even if the impact is small, it will throw the science community into a spin.

Interestingly, researchers at Purdue first noticed something awry when they were using radioactive samples for random number generation. Each decay event occurs randomly (hence the white noise you'd hear from a Geiger counter), so radioactive samples provide a non-biased random number generator.

[link to news.discovery.com]

There seems to always be someone stiring the pot...I remember 2 weeks ago it was Owen, now EJ, and a few before that too, it changes the atmosphere here.

Like weather the atmostphere changes sometimes turbulent sometimes calm.That is life.Now I believe that ej is a person who likes to have the facts corroberated,his ducks in a row so to speak.ej correct me if I am wrong.He is correct by saying that none of this is validated in the mainstream media but I wouldn't expect it to be.Unless one of us knows someone who didn't come back from a trip on a submarine we wouldn't know anything for sure at present at least.The no fly zone took care of that.It is much kinder to agree to disagree rather than make unkind personal comments .

me, Owen, will now defend this thread and its purpose.
few weeks ago I saw for the first time, how a thread can be distorted by socalled newcomers, I got upset.
I apologized for that, you recall?




Yes Owen, that was my point, we all loose our cool or ruffle feathers, weather we mean to or not, that is because we are all different. That is what I meant by taking it all with a grain of salt.

And EJ, I don't care WHO you are either, (the same as I didn't care if OP was who he said, or an Aussie with a friend in a french sub)..... just add to the thread, if you require proof, then maybe you could go get some...rather than demanding it of others. We have found our own proofs, in many ways.

Goodnight All