Something Just Went BEZERK in the Gulf of Mexico. The US Navy just sunk a French Submarine

The best way to end this bickering is for each person here to IGNORE someones post if it is what you would personally deem to be offensive, intrusive, disruptive, or devisive.

There is no way to have a conversation about something when you are constantly interrupted by irrevelant voices that repeat themeselves over and over to prumulgate their message. It is only by listening to that voice that their message gets prumulgated.


So, to sum it up, If someone is being what you personally would call disruptive, then remember this.

Don't feed the trolls. If you do, they will follow you home and crap in your house.

The best way to end this bickering is for each person here to IGNORE someones post if it is what you would personally deem to be offensive, intrusive, disruptive, or devisive.

There is no way to have a conversation about something when you are constantly interrupted by irrevelant voices that repeat themeselves over and over to prumulgate their message. It is only by listening to that voice that their message gets prumulgated.


So, to sum it up, If someone is being what you personally would call disruptive, then remember this.

Don't feed the trolls. If you do, they will follow you home and crap in your house.

House Momma, Just cocede that this is a horrible hoax against the people that live on the GOM and I will tell everyone to leave this post. When you got NEXAS lieing about the dead microbioligist who seems to be your ring leader,You've brought this amongst yourself with deceptions Alot of people don't have the time to prove or dis-prove what you say, Yes the statement below says everything goes
but when it pertains to a serious nature forget about the money for once and have compassion.

.....
----


Now THAT is very interesting!Very interesting indeed considering what the North Korean leader has been saying recently!Is there a typhoon in the neighborhood or has one been Haarped?


Who's HAARP? China's? Russia's? USA's? Europe's? Japan's?

hey ej . you said you were going for a pint. had a couple ,have we? now its time to get on the thread and talk shit. am i right? i am arnt i. thats why you cant spell most of the time. dyslexic or pissed. youve been debunked mate, just like you reckon nexus has.

2 pints mate the pub is just round the coner and i hav been dooing some minor spl corections before posting is all i am genuin wot i am being so tanashus about is the fact a french man is acusing my counterys armed forses of causing this oil spill and saying he has acses to milatery coms via dipo chan
i hav the utmost respect for my countery and its brave men and women who are fighting and dieng in this world to protect wot we all hold dear and i canot and will not stand by and doo nothing wen this info is on the world stage because of nexus i will fight with every tool at my disposal to proov this man wrong how dare the poisanas litl shit bad mouth my boys without castiron uncontravertable proof and wots moor looking at the title of this thread i expected a lot more from the us to clar thare milaterys name from thes acusations
this is my patriotic side ware is yours ???????

@ "the team" ;)


could somebody help me out and sum up the current state of information / speculation of the GoM/GoA connection with respect to the SGs? ( in a few sentences or even words)

Just stumbeled over krispys post again:




-Krispy 8:47 AM 7/21/2010 (pag 328) Connecting dots stargates-gold. Reaction on VID posted by Bevvy : [link to www.youtube.com]
In the vid they say : 1st gate in Aden, 2nd gate in miami circle of florida , teams on their way (=subs) , when Aden gate reach readyness > golden particles all over the place in the water !!!! > What have we been seeing in the water : golden orange-yellow droplets/particles ! screenshots : [link to www.mijnalbum.nl] and [link to www.mijnalbum.nl] So could that mean that the GOM-gate is already in "readyness" ????



... is this still a topic?? I first wanted to not get into this for the article cause i thought it was a little too much for the "ordinary" reader, but as i go through the sumaries, posts on this keep and keep showing up....

your opinion...?


--edit for quote signs--

may have a connection considering the show of force in the area
also the magnetic anomalies reported by the op may find an explanation here
ever see the movie Stargate?

hey ej . you said you were going for a pint. had a couple ,have we? now its time to get on the thread and talk shit. am i right? i am arnt i. thats why you cant spell most of the time. dyslexic or pissed. youve been debunked mate, just like you reckon nexus has.

2 pints mate the pub is just round the coner and i hav been dooing some minor spl corections before posting is all i am genuin wot i am being so tanashus about is the fact a french man is acusing my counterys armed forses of causing this oil spill and saying he has acses to milatery coms via dipo chan
i hav the utmost respect for my countery and its brave men and women who are fighting and dieng in this world to protect wot we all hold dear and i canot and will not stand by and doo nothing wen this info is on the world stage because of nexus i will fight with every tool at my disposal to proov this man wrong how dare the poisanas litl shit bad mouth my boys without castiron uncontravertable proof and wots moor looking at the title of this thread i expected a lot more from the us to clar thare milaterys name from thes acusations
this is my patriotic side ware is yours ???????

your silans is defaning

Zecharia Sitchin is one of a very few on this planet at this time who can read Sumerian cuneiform (first known writing) like it was the New York Times

Zecharia Sitchin is one of a very few on this planet at this time who can read Sumerian cuneiform (first known writing) like it was the New York Times, thus has the chops to correctly interpret the source material of the Torah and the Bible. Can you read those documents?

hey ej . you said you were going for a pint. had a couple ,have we? now its time to get on the thread and talk shit. am i right? i am arnt i. thats why you cant spell most of the time. dyslexic or pissed. youve been debunked mate, just like you reckon nexus has.

2 pints mate the pub is just round the coner and i hav been dooing some minor spl corections before posting is all i am genuin wot i am being so tanashus about is the fact a french man is acusing my counterys armed forses of causing this oil spill and saying he has acses to milatery coms via dipo chan
i hav the utmost respect for my countery and its brave men and women who are fighting and dieng in this world to protect wot we all hold dear and i canot and will not stand by and doo nothing wen this info is on the world stage because of nexus i will fight with every tool at my disposal to proov this man wrong how dare the poisanas litl shit bad mouth my boys without castiron uncontravertable proof and wots moor looking at the title of this thread i expected a lot more from the us to clar thare milaterys name from thes acusations
this is my patriotic side ware is yours ???????

your silans is defaning


wheres my what???

hey" live for yehwa" you seem to take a book that cannot be proven in any way as fact and take it seriously too. thats fine,mate. your call. but to continually harrass the premise of this tread because you dont share the subjective opinions of most of its contributors is bad form. if you wish people to respect your fantasies then you must respect others to indulge in theirs. you have made your points enough, if you wish to do so again please start your own thread.

but you can take a book written by zecharia stichen deciphered by only him and call it truth
Concede this post is a hoax and we will move on....!

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

hey" live for yehwa" you seem to take a book that cannot be proven in any way as fact and take it seriously too. thats fine,mate. your call. but to continually harrass the premise of this tread because you dont share the subjective opinions of most of its contributors is bad form. if you wish people to respect your fantasies then you must respect others to indulge in theirs. you have made your points enough, if you wish to do so again please start your own thread.

but you can take a book written by zecharia stichen deciphered by only him and call it truth
Concede this post is a hoax and we will move on....!


ahem, that was me

Zecharia Sitchin is one of a very few on this planet at this time who can read Sumerian cuneiform (first known writing) like it was the New York Times, thus has the chops to correctly interpret the source material of the Torah and the Bible. Can you read those documents?

Zecharia Sitchin is one of a very few on this planet at this time who can read Sumerian cuneiform (first known writing) like it was the New York Times, thus has the chops to correctly interpret the source material of the Torah and the Bible. Can you read those documents?


[link to www.sitchiniswrong.com]

"As noted above, the ancient Mesopotamian scribes created dictionaries. Lists of words are a common feature among the thousands of Sumerian and Akkadian cuneiform tablets which have been discovered by archaeologists. Many are just groupings of common words, while others represent an inventory of the word meanings of the languages used in Mesopotamia. These “lexical lists”, as scholars call them, were indispensable to the 19th century scholars who deciphered the Sumerian and Akkadian texts, for they were used to compile modern dictionaries of these languages. Today all major lexical texts have been published in the multi-volume set, Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon, begun by Benno Landsberger in the 1930s. It is indeed a rare instance where ancient dictionaries of a dead language form the core of the modern dictionaries used by scholars of today. Such is the case for the ancient languages of Sumer and Akkad. Sadly, Mr. Sitchin neglects these resources.

What is a Lexical List?

To learn more about lexical lists, you can go to the website of the Digital Corpus of Cuneiform Literature (DCCLT) maintained by the University of California at Berkeley. Click on the cuneiform tablet to go to the DCCLT's explanation of lexical lists. The important point in all this is that Sitchin's translation of key terms, like Sumerian MU, conflict with the bilingual material of the lexical lists compiled by the Mesopotamian scribes themselves.

If you want to check the most up-to-date scholarly translations of Sumerian literature for evidence of Sitchin's "translations," or if you want to search a Sumerian word in these texts, go to the online Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL) maintained by Oxford University. You can click on "Anunnaki" in the navigation pane on the left to watch a video of Dr. Heiser's search for the term "Anunnaki" at the ETCSL website

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

Zecharia Sitchin is one of a very few on this planet at this time who can read Sumerian cuneiform (first known writing) like it was the New York Times, thus has the chops to correctly interpret the source material of the Torah and the Bible. Can you read those documents?


[link to www.sitchiniswrong.com]

"As noted above, the ancient Mesopotamian scribes created dictionaries. Lists of words are a common feature among the thousands of Sumerian and Akkadian cuneiform tablets which have been discovered by archaeologists. Many are just groupings of common words, while others represent an inventory of the word meanings of the languages used in Mesopotamia. These “lexical lists”, as scholars call them, were indispensable to the 19th century scholars who deciphered the Sumerian and Akkadian texts, for they were used to compile modern dictionaries of these languages. Today all major lexical texts have been published in the multi-volume set, Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon, begun by Benno Landsberger in the 1930s. It is indeed a rare instance where ancient dictionaries of a dead language form the core of the modern dictionaries used by scholars of today. Such is the case for the ancient languages of Sumer and Akkad. Sadly, Mr. Sitchin neglects these resources.

What is a Lexical List?

To learn more about lexical lists, you can go to the website of the Digital Corpus of Cuneiform Literature (DCCLT) maintained by the University of California at Berkeley. Click on the cuneiform tablet to go to the DCCLT's explanation of lexical lists. The important point in all this is that Sitchin's translation of key terms, like Sumerian MU, conflict with the bilingual material of the lexical lists compiled by the Mesopotamian scribes themselves.

If you want to check the most up-to-date scholarly translations of Sumerian literature for evidence of Sitchin's "translations," or if you want to search a Sumerian word in these texts, go to the online Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (ETCSL) maintained by Oxford University. You can click on "Anunnaki" in the navigation pane on the left to watch a video of Dr. Heiser's search for the term "Anunnaki" at the ETCSL website


This kid is clearly adhering to the traditional interpretations, which Sitchin did not regarding one or two key words. Sitchin maintains that secondary or tertiary definitions were used for those words in the traditional translations. He merely replaced those with the primary definitions. This is a matter of interpretation among scholars. Sitchin upset the apple cart of ancient linguistics, so I would expect a strong defense of the traditional translations, which this kid is doing. My point was that he could actually read the original clay tablets. I've read all of Sitchin after I was his "roadie" at an expo in SFO years ago - spent time with him and his wife. So, I'm prejudiced in favor of Sitchin;-)

This kid is clearly adhering to the traditional interpretations, which Sitchin did not regarding one or two key words. Sitchin maintains that secondary or tertiary definitions were used for those words in the traditional translations. He merely replaced those with the primary definitions. This is a matter of interpretation among scholars. Sitchin upset the apple cart of ancient linguistics, so I would expect a strong defense of the traditional translations, which this kid is doing. My point was that he could actually read the original clay tablets. I've read all of Sitchin after I was his "roadie" at an expo in SFO years ago - spent time with him and his wife. So, I'm prejudiced in favor of Sitchin;-)

<snip>
My point was that he could actually read the original clay tablets. I've read all of Sitchin after I was his "roadie" at an expo in SFO years ago - spent time with him and his wife. So, I'm prejudiced in favor of Sitchin;-)

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

Goed maar baie versigtig dankie. Ons weet nie meer wie is aan wie se kant nie. Veral nie die Chinese nie.

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

Goed maar baie versigtig dankie. Ons weet nie meer wie is aan wie se kant nie. Veral nie die Chinese nie.

<snip>
My point was that he could actually read the original clay tablets. I've read all of Sitchin after I was his "roadie" at an expo in SFO years ago - spent time with him and his wife. So, I'm prejudiced in favor of Sitchin;-)


How cool is that? Bet he's interesting as all get out!

I've always liked Sitchin's willingness step outside that rigid box today's scientists confine themselves with. He makes some thin connections here and there, but overall, what he's written makes more sense than a lot of the mainstream 'truths' I've read.

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

Goed maar baie versigtig dankie. Ons weet nie meer wie is aan wie se kant nie. Veral nie die Chinese nie.

hoe het jou byeenkoms te gaan

Goed maar baie versigtig dankie. Ons weet nie meer wie is aan wie se kant nie. Veral nie die Chinese nie.



Really?