Seeing as we're concentrating on polar regios, can we re-evaluate DEEP FREEZE and ANTI FREEZE ?

Perhaps these terminologies refer to a technique first developed in Antarctica? As in an anti-organism method, a suppressant?



Your post got me thinking:

We understand that the organism has been on Earth for a long long time. We understand that the Russians seem to have found out about the organism some time ago. We suspect Lake Baikal, and now we see hints that it may have been under the Antarctic. Being under so much ice and low temps could explain maybe, a hibernation and lack of previous discovery and disturbance.

We understand that the organism splash zones are connected to something incoming from space also.

I'm thinking DEEP and ANTI might refer to the two sources/origins of the organism - and that FREEZE is an acronym for the organism itself
-DEEP = DEEP space organism (incoming splash zones?)
-ANTI = ANTarctica/Inner-earth organism
FREEZE = FReakingEvilExtraterrestialZergingEarthlings

Maybe the organism ...
- was dormant under Antarctica in the first instance
- got disturbed/activated by man, or solar stuff, or et signals
- traveled along the known ancient volcanic lava tubes that run out from under Antarctica and emerged in multiple locations like the GoM, Falklands etc
- I get lost here - where the incoming splash zones enter the picture and signals from space are involved.

but you get my drift